Topic: BUYBACK TOKENS SOLVES DUMPING - page 2. (Read 9834 times)
first, I did a buyback on the ICO token that I bought. especially after the bounty distribution, because prices will fall. but now I don't do that, many new tokens are difficult to develop up after the dump. and if there are certainly very few and require a long time.
No doubt buyback is a good option to stabilize token price. Most of the dumpers sell their token for little profit and moveon but buy back policy enables them to hold their tokens and does not courage dumpers to dump their tokens fast. Another good idea to stable token price is "burning of tokens" at any specific time. I am holding a token called HBRS, although price of token is badly affected due to dumping but still I believe price will come back to its original ICO price as they have policy of burning a specific amount of tokens for every new user who install their app. It may take one year or more but such good policies will surely stabilizes token price someday.
Buyback must have alot of money and then double funds.team developer must have big funds for make buybacj program when they token price go down.if they want make their price stable on market.but litle condition any developer want to buyback program..often price of token determined by trader when they hasbeen list on exchange
Not all forms of buybacks are well strategize, which then means they may not have real effect or influence in the price and value of the coin. Some projects that acclaim to be be doing buyback, are only doing it for few set of people, sometimes one unreal person might end up getting the price, on an exchange with very low volume, which practically means that trading will never be effective on such.
Also, if there will be a buyback for any coin, the project should have a product. Even if the product is not fully ready or that are still some developments yet to be done on it, it should at least be a minimum viable product.
In addition, a buyback should be accompanied by a serious marketing, so as to involve so many traders and investors.
Also, if there will be a buyback for any coin, the project should have a product. Even if the product is not fully ready or that are still some developments yet to be done on it, it should at least be a minimum viable product.
In addition, a buyback should be accompanied by a serious marketing, so as to involve so many traders and investors.
buyback will indeed have a very good effect on the project, if buyback and burn tokens, but if only buyback then it will not have too much influence on the market price
Buying back tokens is good to diminish the loss from the early dumps from bounty hunters and weak hands to avoid the dump and maintain the attractiveness of the project.
But on the other hand what would happen if the share of the team's assets would grow more and more? I suppose it could lead to some obvious manipulations.
But on the other hand what would happen if the share of the team's assets would grow more and more? I suppose it could lead to some obvious manipulations.
QuarkChain announced buyback program worth 25 million USD.
If you do not believe in buybacks, let watch the situation around QKC and you will see that it really works.
If you do not believe in buybacks, let watch the situation around QKC and you will see that it really works.
I think it is just for a short time increase, buyback can solve dumping, but this is just temporary, the price of the coin will go down slowly for sure, but if you believe that their project has potential then you should keep hold.
It depends. If the team burns the tokens they earned or bought back on a regular basis (like BNB), then we should expect to see positive price movements. But if they plan to dump the tokens they bought back in the future, the buyback cannot solve anything.
Quite crafty but also reasonable, but if it can be used to build prices again, then no problem. It is quite risky to hold a new token, there are only two possibilities, holding back for the sake of waiting for an uncertain price to rise, or immediately selling it before the price falls deeper. This is the importance of a good strategy from the developer. If the token listing on several profitable exchanges, I think can be a solution.
Yes, it's actually a good idea, I know of miracle Tele, the buying back actually helped them and I think the price has stabilized now for sometime. Also fxp announced they will do some buying back soon, it will also help them as well
the buyback program is one way to keep the price of tokens stable and foster trust in investors, but this is not the only way to avoid dumping. indeed some of the projects that carried out this program succeeded in growing the tokens they developed, but there are still many ways from developers to grow their tokens.
I agree buyback is not the only way for developers to stabilise thier token prices but it is the easiest and fastest route with little sustainability anyway because no Coin survives on just trading. Having a working product adopted in the real world is very essential
It depends. If the team burns the tokens they earned or bought back on a regular basis (like BNB), then we should expect to see positive price movements. But if they plan to dump the tokens they bought back in the future, the buyback cannot solve anything.
I took part in a bounty campaign and the team bought back tokens to prevent dumping. The stacking rewards also earned bi-weekly also prevents people from dumping the tokens and rather holding them.
To buy back tokens from investors or bounty hunters is really not a easy thing to do but projects that introduce buyback have pro teams and devs and the project is successful thats why they can easily afford the buyback which makes the coin or token have good price value, buying back coins and tokens by teams actually solve dumping
Of course, buy back strategy has a good impact on the project because it is one of the means to attract investors and tell them how capable the coin can be bought back and sold at higher price in the future. This motivates long term holders as it gives them reason not to dump but hold for the higher price in future.
Not every project is capable of doing the buy back because not every project raise a good amount of money. Buy back is only for those who raise a decent amount and this project has a good potential, the team has to ensure they are capable of doing the buy back and will not affect the future of the project, if the purpose of the buy back is to only avoid the dump from bounty hunters, I don't think it would work well in the long run.
Of course, buy back strategy has a good impact on the project because it is one of the means to attract investors and tell them how capable the coin can be bought back and sold at higher price in the future. This motivates long term holders as it gives them reason not to dump but hold for the higher price in future.
Some buyback from project developers are bad idea because it wasnt planned very well and some projects buyback is nothing different from bounty hunters dumping on exchanges because they buyback at ridiculous price.
it caused by the developers have been putting various requirements to do that. If the team was putting easy requirements and the buyback method can at least solve the dump. If they have done it before the token goes to the exchange site and that will defend the price of token. 
I agree with you. The only buyback can solve the dumping problem. But you know what, most of the ICO projects don't want to go through this process! Once they said it is against the rule! I don't know what rules or maybe they don't care about the investor's loss! Buyback can make a positive hype among the holders and they will hold the token tight than selling!
The buyback mechanism really have good effect on dumpers trying to dump their tokens ,lately two projects I promoted started buying back their own token from bounty hunters or big whales who wants to sell off and move on ,the first project is miracle tele project and the buyback is already on going ,the second one is about to start and the name is CHELLE Coin, buying back tokens is a brilliant idea what do you guys think?
yes that's true, but why some team don't do a buy back is because they don't have the money to do a buy back. They must have lied that they raised money when they actually didn't and the token prices on exchanges keeps looking bad
This is a really good move from a project. If a project spends 500K to 1 Million USD in buyback then that project will grow very well. The GXC coin has this plan and now their coin price is now over 2 USD! For this price backed, holders will be interested in holding not in selling. So, buyback really helps a project coin to grow forward.
Jump to: