Just had to make a thread about this. 
nice call. what is your call for december 2014 ? (just asking to put my life savings on your call
) 
Topic: By December 31st, 2013 we will have touched $1000/BTC (Read 3779 times)
nice call. what is your call for december 2014 ? (just asking to put my life savings on your call
) 
It will happen much sooner than that. I would say by June.
I was off by a few months, but I gotta give the kudos to smoothie 
u appear to have been money blind and delusional and thus your prediction don't mean a thing even if it would reach $1k in june
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/price-chart-april-9th-200-april-15th-300-167611
yea, nothing wrong with that. i've been there to
It will happen much sooner than that. I would say by June.
I was off by a few months, but I gotta give the kudos to smoothie u appear to have been money blind and delusional and thus your prediction don't mean a thing even if it would reach $1k in june
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/price-chart-april-9th-200-april-15th-300-167611
It will happen much sooner than that. I would say by June.
I was off by a few months, but I gotta give the kudos to smoothie u appear to have been money blind and delusional and thus your prediction don't mean a thing even if it would reach $1k in june
It will happen much sooner than that. I would say by June.
I was off by a few months, but I gotta give the kudos to smoothie 
Smoothie was right again.
Damn... Smoothie is on a roll!
Smoothie was right again.
Case in point: PokerStars...
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
How about an uncertain regulatory future, all the effort they've put into looking legit and fight money laundering then associating with an untraceable currency, having to deal with stolen (or not) BTC being traced to their wallets and someone demanding it back, exchange rate wilder than an angry bull making it highly risky to allow any tournament play since their $2.20 buyin could be worth $.50 or $4 two hours later? How about trying to figure out rake?
Not that there's not positives, but I can think of plenty of logical reasons why they wouldn't. Just sayin'.
Well they could use BitPay so users Bitcoins would immediately turn into fiat money.
They are also very stringent about how they allow you to cash out under the banner of anti-money laundering. How could they let you anonymously cash out and still say that with a straight face?
Case in point: PokerStars...
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
How about an uncertain regulatory future, all the effort they've put into looking legit and fight money laundering then associating with an untraceable currency, having to deal with stolen (or not) BTC being traced to their wallets and someone demanding it back, exchange rate wilder than an angry bull making it highly risky to allow any tournament play since their $2.20 buyin could be worth $.50 or $4 two hours later? How about trying to figure out rake?
Not that there's not positives, but I can think of plenty of logical reasons why they wouldn't. Just sayin'.
Well they could use BitPay so users Bitcoins would immediately turn into fiat money.
Case in point: PokerStars...
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
They have everything to gain if they start accepting it. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't.
How about an uncertain regulatory future, all the effort they've put into looking legit and fight money laundering then associating with an untraceable currency, having to deal with stolen (or not) BTC being traced to their wallets and someone demanding it back, exchange rate wilder than an angry bull making it highly risky to allow any tournament play since their $2.20 buyin could be worth $.50 or $4 two hours later? How about trying to figure out rake?
Not that there's not positives, but I can think of plenty of logical reasons why they wouldn't. Just sayin'.
'There is no value, only Bitcoin'.
$1000 = 1 BTC is pretty realistic now. 
:D:D
If I wanted to send cash on the internet Bitcoin would be how I would want to do it: free, anonymous and fast
That's a vast *VAST* market
:D:DIf I wanted to send cash on the internet Bitcoin would be how I would want to do it: free, anonymous and fast
That's a vast *VAST* market
Lets wait until the next correction before we gauge a value a year down the line.
No.
Lets wait until the next correction before we gauge a value a year down the line.
I think it'll burst... 
i agree there will be volatility but the fundamentals for bitcoin are up over the long term (years). My OP was 8 months from now.
I think it'll burst...
milli vanillis
I've just been saying milli-bit. The coin part at the end is too much work.
Very, very unlikely. Also, looks more and more like the correction is coming. Low volume, etc.
Proudhorn called it!
We're definitely going to touch 1$ per mBTC!
+1
nice call.. we should adopt the mBTC as base value before 2014 within the community.. I'll aim at that train of tought !
It needs a nice user-friendly name though. mBTC is too geeky and we want the non-geeks to buy Bitcoin too right?
Any ideas?
Lots of people already calling them Millies (for milli-Bitcoin). mBTC works well as the symbol.
Very, very unlikely. Also, looks more and more like the correction is coming. Low volume, etc.
Proudhorn called it!
We're definitely going to touch 1$ per mBTC!
+1
nice call.. we should adopt the mBTC as base value before 2014 within the community.. I'll aim at that train of tought !
It needs a nice user-friendly name though. mBTC is too geeky and we want the non-geeks to buy Bitcoin too right?
Any ideas?
Jump to: