Topic: ByteCoin Update (Bounties!) 21st of April 2014 (Read 5618 times)
is there a new version of the windows installer>?
Is this issue fixed?
this is without the merged mining that im getting the issue
We have also added ByteCoin and now has it's own page on http://coinwik.org a wikipedia listing all the alt coins to help you quickly find facts and links about your favorite coin.
http://coinwik.org/ByteCoin
If you know of other facts and links that can be added to the page, please feel free to update the page.
Wow, thanks for listing us in there
Ahmed_bodi, sorry to here about your mismatch issue, if you can update us to that latest client WITHOUT the merged mining, perhaps you can work on that later?
Best of luck to everyone holding onto these coins
ive been working at it. getting a genesis block mismatch
Bummer. So it's a no go?
ive been working at it. getting a genesis block mismatch
Quick update for everyone. yesterday i began updating bytecoin to the bitcoin 0.9.1 base its in the CryptoRepairCrew/bitcoin repo on github (bytecoin branch). Once its running and tested i will be making it merged mined.
Ahmed
Ahmed
Was this ever implemented?
Thanks
We have also added ByteCoin and now has it's own page on http://coinwik.org a wikipedia listing all the alt coins to help you quickly find facts and links about your favorite coin.
http://coinwik.org/ByteCoin
If you know of other facts and links that can be added to the page, please feel free to update the page.
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
Which came first?
well from personal belief the SHA256 (this one) came first. However the CN Based one claims on their website that they came first and also that its very widely used however until about 2 months ago no one had heard of it here
regardless of who was first, (upon investigation is seems quite likely that we were second, even if we were more widely known in the bitcointalk forum) it seems that it is US who are trying to revive a coin that needs all the help it can get. If ahmed_bodi is able to fix us a new client AND get merged mining to work than I think we could rename the coin BodiBytes, or at least have a discussion about what miners would go for. keeping in mind that we will need to convince a majority of miners to update to the new client for it to be successful, I only have a few gigahashes, not enough to make much of a difference, but I'll do my best when the time comes
As has been mentioned before, bytecoin.org is actually a different coin. If you wish to help ahmed_bodi in working on the sha256 bitcoin clone then we may have to consider renaming it. But let's worry about that when we are closer to having some news on the new client. Thanks again ahmed_bodi and the crypto repair crew for working on this.
Merged mining brings in security. With security comes people willing to bring features. With features comes a real use. and with a real use comes VALUE! 
Thanks ahmed_bodi, nice to see your still working on this
agreed!!!
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
Which came first?
well from personal belief the SHA256 (this one) came first. However the CN Based one claims on their website that they came first and also that its very widely used however until about 2 months ago no one had heard of it here
I remember it. It was supposed to be different from bitcoin rather than a reboot.
Also like I said, this forum is hostile to alts anyways.
So the question is how do we reasonably differentiate?
I refused to use Panda coin because there were 3 versions.
Even with cats, there's meow, there's kitteh, there's nyan, and there's cats.
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
Which came first?
well from personal belief the SHA256 (this one) came first. However the CN Based one claims on their website that they came first and also that its very widely used however until about 2 months ago no one had heard of it here
I remember it. It was supposed to be different from bitcoin rather than a reboot.
Also like I said, this forum is hostile to alts anyways.
So the question is how do we reasonably differentiate?
I refused to use Panda coin because there were 3 versions.
Even with cats, there's meow, there's kitteh, there's nyan, and there's cats.
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
Which came first?
well from personal belief the SHA256 (this one) came first. However the CN Based one claims on their website that they came first and also that its very widely used however until about 2 months ago no one had heard of it here
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
Which came first?
thats not the real bytecoin. Thats the CN based one
I disagree. Merged mining brings in security. With security comes people willing to bring features. With features comes a real use. and with a real use comes VALUE!
People bring features because they are creative. Features are your job anyway, not third party. Security doesn't bring features, it brings price manipulation. And the BTC/LTC crowd hate alt-coins so they will destroy the price before anyone gets to use the coin.
Real use comes directly from desire to create. It is not a product, but a producer. Your evolution theory is backwards. Create it yourself.
Quick update for everyone. yesterday i began updating bytecoin to the bitcoin 0.9.1 base its in the CryptoRepairCrew/bitcoin repo on github (bytecoin branch). Once its running and tested i will be making it merged mined.
Ahmed
Ahmed
is bytecoin.org still alive or is it dead?
its been dead for around a year
I would caution against merge mining. You will #1 be second fiddle or fifteenth fiddle and #2 you will be someone else's garbage dump.
I work on Catcoin which aims to be Bitcoin in scrypt. Perhaps we have common interests. I don't see either BTC or LTC crowd innovating anymore, just a bunch of zombie hoarders.
I disagree. Merged mining brings in security. With security comes people willing to bring features. With features comes a real use. and with a real use comes VALUE!
Quick update for everyone. yesterday i began updating bytecoin to the bitcoin 0.9.1 base its in the CryptoRepairCrew/bitcoin repo on github (bytecoin branch). Once its running and tested i will be making it merged mined.
Ahmed
Ahmed
is bytecoin.org still alive or is it dead?
its been dead for around a year
I would caution against merge mining. You will #1 be second fiddle or fifteenth fiddle and #2 you will be someone else's garbage dump.
I work on Catcoin which aims to be Bitcoin in scrypt. Perhaps we have common interests. I don't see either BTC or LTC crowd innovating anymore, just a bunch of zombie hoarders.
Jump to: