Topic: Calling out allyouracid to justify your Feedback on my profile (Community too) (Read 673 times)

Joel_Jantsen's PM --> 15:53:03 (3:53 PM)
PM information --> January 31, 2016, 17:35:19 (5:35 PM)

Joel_Jantsen's "connection" --> January 31, 2016, 01:50:34 PM

Correct me if I am wrong, 1 PM comes before 5 PM?  

---

Anyway, everything is resolved so thread can be locked.

Ok. I searched through my PMs, and I found something:


While I can't really remember everything from back then, it seems we already talked about that. I really have no idea what lead me to post that rating especially since we've had a PM exchange.
From the timestamps, it seems though that the information I gave him in the PM lead Joel to falsely accuse me as a scammer.

However, I hope everything's good, now.

Edit: this is the thread from the scammer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13594272

So, for everybody reading this, it should be very clear that there's nothing of substance about all this.

To recap / sort of tl;dr on the whole situation, in chronological order:

- a wannabe blackmailer tried extorting someone on bitcointalk.org
- the blackmailed one went public, using this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13594272
- I saw that thread, told the blackmailer to leave people alone if I send him that lousy amount of 0.02 BTC

- Joel somehow noticed that blackmailer in another event
- after some research, Joel found my BTC address being connected with it (because I sent the blackmailer the 0.02 BTC to gtfo), see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13733052
- Joel asked me how my BTC address was involved with that (see screenshot of PM right above)
- I explained, even backed it up with links (see screenshot of PM right above)
- that somehow lead Joel to think I am the blackmailer (a quick check of the BTC address in question would quickly reveal that I don't* deal with such amounts, thus it makes no sense for me to blackmail people for 0.02 BTC)
- I was annoyed by that, left him the bad rating
- Joel didn't bother, because (as he said) he's used to getting negative feedback which isn't justified

- trust settings get changed on bitcointalk.org
- suddenly, my rating caused Joel's trust to appear red (again, sorry!)
- Joel opened this thread, because he thought he was removed from a campaign (which BoXXoB cleared up: he luckily wasn't)
- allyouracid (me, heh) removes the red trust, explains everything, hoping to clear everything up


* not don't, didn't - at that time. See address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1FuckUpmVUxwHZH1vkLNkEYB8dTvsS782E?offset=600&filter=6
Right now, this address has small amounts incoming because of masternode rewards etc

This thread isn't about you, or even Lauda (phantastisch actually distrusts Lauda, in case you didn't notice). If you want to complain about your red trust, create your own thread instead of hijacking other people's.

You really might wanna read the last posts here.
What you wrote makes no sense in this context.

You need to be Lauda's ass kisser to be able to get your red removed,you excluded the CULT thats why a random account has painted  you.Look at my trust,theymos allowed voting but they have accused me of conspiring with people who kick these abusers.

I see. Thanks for the hint.

@BoXXoB, is it possible to get Joel back into the campaign? I'd hate if he was excluded because of that.

edit: sent him a PM.

edit2:

The post I sent him negative rep for was this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13733052
As I said: he drew the wrong conclusions. How it really was:
- that guy the thread was about was trying to extort money out of someone
- I came into the thread, told him to stop this crap ("I'll send you the 0.02 BTC and you promise to leave this guy alone", something along those lines)
- later, a thread about this guy came up (the thread linked above)
- Joel saw that an address of mine sent him said 0.02 BTC and wrongly concluded that I was associated with that scammer.

If anyone feels it's necessary, I'll go through my posts to find the one where I sent him the money to stop annoying others.


edit3:

This post in the same thread already clears it up: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13733081

So, I hope I could provide some transparency, now. And I hope we can put this issue to rest without anybody suffering any consequences.
Also, I hope it's clear that the trust rating wasn't totally out of thin air (nobody likes being called a scammer, especially if it's not even true). But as I already mentioned, I should have at least provided a link.

Edit 4:
Of course - while the rating I gave him was based on a false accusation (I think I even pmed him, but got no response... but I'm not 100% sure of this, I'd have to check once I'm back home), I'm sure his intentions were good. Errors just happen, and I think the best way to sort out issues is to talk to each other, which I'm more than happy to do.

Edit 5:

Loyce pointed me at it... for those wondering why I left that rating that long after Joel's post: this was simply because I only saw that post that late, when I either googled for my BTC address or used that one block explorer which also shows mentions of BTC addresses on the web.  

Edit 6 - hopefully the last:

I talked to BoXXoB: he only thought of removing Joel from the campaign but never actually did. So, at least Joel didn't incur financial damage because of that.

His campaign manager has posted here


It's just above, it looks like a miscommunication, with a cooling off period to sort this out. In turn it's kind of been sorted as far as the trust part - for now you've been excluded from DT2 through the voting system. This may have been done if members felt your feedbacks are lacking in quality/reference; I think the new system went through a few days of people cleaning things up when it was implemented. I'm still trying to catch up on that.


All that is really left is for you two to sort out the personal matter of the feedback. Good luck working it out both of you.

---

Loyce I'm going to jump over to your trust viewer thread. I'll be referencing this scenario