@thule I’m looking forward to a lawsuite never had one of those before.
Fucktard mouthy pajeet. Just do it you fool, you won’t as you are nothing more than an account trading pajeet.
Laters my little flower, looking forward to the next post with a ticking clock and a load of horse shit from you
Topic: calling out Thule - page 2. (Read 12162 times)
You guys can post as much shit as you want trying to discourage me.It won't happen anymore.
Suchmoon will get served as first should she not fullfill my offical request in next 7 days.
TMAN will get servered in the UK since he is a UK citizen even he lives in Bulgaria.So no TMAN even you claim your bs i don't need to vitis BG as everything will be handled in the UK.
Martin you are a big mouth and nothing more.You are a scarry little child who can only blast big words but ones i take you words you hide like a pussy.
I sent you again a request to your facebook profil to confirm you are Vod.Why are you pussy hiding now ?
You are lucky that theymos is protecting your IP currently since he requested me when talking to him to get a court decission in the US.
You little boy are so chicken that you are now doing anything so you can't be held liable but spreading false big proposals.
You want me to open a case against you ?I'm still waiting for you to confirm on your facebook profil that you are Vod.
But you know what Martin.Since you are a big mouth and a scared chicken unable to deliver your claims i decided should you not provide identity proof which could be used in a court case i will accept your offer and ask a lawcompany to send you an email asking for your details and send you based on these details a legal letter asking if you confirm that you are Vod on bitcointalk.
Let the forum see what a grown up men you are and that you are not going to hide against that lawsuite.
You know why i don't have a problem to open a lawsuite with my company ?Because there is no dirt on me which they could use.Thats the big diffrence.I have no dirt and they can't threaten me with anything.
They can digg as much as they want.They won't find anything.
Have a nice one.
Suchmoon will get served as first should she not fullfill my offical request in next 7 days.
TMAN will get servered in the UK since he is a UK citizen even he lives in Bulgaria.So no TMAN even you claim your bs i don't need to vitis BG as everything will be handled in the UK.
Martin you are a big mouth and nothing more.You are a scarry little child who can only blast big words but ones i take you words you hide like a pussy.
I sent you again a request to your facebook profil to confirm you are Vod.Why are you pussy hiding now ?
You are lucky that theymos is protecting your IP currently since he requested me when talking to him to get a court decission in the US.
You little boy are so chicken that you are now doing anything so you can't be held liable but spreading false big proposals.
You want me to open a case against you ?I'm still waiting for you to confirm on your facebook profil that you are Vod.
Quote
How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."
Let's see how my company will be counted in court.What i can say its even on a public blockchain viewable how much assets my company is administrating.Based on that and the loss of income will be counted in court.I got also evidences safed where i told suchmoon and vod that my company is facing losses because of their abusive feedbacks.But you know what Martin.Since you are a big mouth and a scared chicken unable to deliver your claims i decided should you not provide identity proof which could be used in a court case i will accept your offer and ask a lawcompany to send you an email asking for your details and send you based on these details a legal letter asking if you confirm that you are Vod on bitcointalk.
Let the forum see what a grown up men you are and that you are not going to hide against that lawsuite.
You know why i don't have a problem to open a lawsuite with my company ?Because there is no dirt on me which they could use.Thats the big diffrence.I have no dirt and they can't threaten me with anything.
They can digg as much as they want.They won't find anything.
Have a nice one.
How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."
Please guys - stop advising Thule against this, I am so excited for some action, like I get a raging erection each time this thread is bumped thinking that the Pajeet has actually done something other than talk for once.
Pajeet Thule - come at me bro!
I am going to have to disagree with your conclusions on this one. You are free to do as you wish, but I stand by my statement that a defamatory statement against an online identity can be a tort, even if the person's IRL identity is not known.
K... Supporting example(s) please?
If you were to go up to a random person on the street and say they are cheating on their spouse, you would be slandering them (assuming this is untrue), even if you do not know who they are. If the person is not a "public figure" ignorance of the truth is not a defense to libel nor is relying on inaccurate information.
Again, not true. Not only do you not know who you are slandering (if the person is truly "random"), but somebody else (a third party) needs to be present in order for it to be considered defamatory. You can't defame somebody if you don't know who they are.
I found this from a legal blog:
this one is for Thule the pajeet who got no lawyer
He can probably hire QS for pretty cheap but I don't recommend it.
guys can we keep the OG/VOD/QS threeway in another thread?
this one is for Thule the pajeet who got no lawyer
this one is for Thule the pajeet who got no lawyer
Does anyone really believe in these lame defamation lawsuits? Quite pathetic actually.
Added: Still no action from Thule, QS or OG on their threats...
Thule is all talk, 2nd most annyone after pajeethunter aka cryptohunter. 
I am going to have to disagree with your conclusions on this one. You are free to do as you wish, but I stand by my statement that a defamatory statement against an online identity can be a tort, even if the person's IRL identity is not known.
Good. When I find out your identity, you can pay for calling me a pedo. Unless you have a police file number, of course.
Hypocrite.
Added: Still no action from Thule, QS or OG on their threats...
He PM’ed me a few days ago asking me to confirm if your country of residence was one of two countries you lived in — he said he found someone to sell your dox and was trying to arrange escrow. I asked him what he was going to do with the information and he responded that he planned on filling a lawsuit (presumably for libel) against you. I told him I was away from my computer and would get back to him. I forgot about his request and he messaged me to follow up, I responded that if he gave me what he received I could confirm if it is correct — I haven’t received a response.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
Why would you give somebody who is clearly slightly unhinged TMAN’s personal information?
QS, I used to really, really respect you but it seems you’re always around to be semi helpful to the likes of cryptohunter, Thule etc, why?
The purpose of my post was to lay out the facts as to what happened and allow others to form their own conclusions, however my conclusion is that Thule did not actually receive any personal information, and probably was not actually willing to pay for said information.
The only thing you actually said here was that you dont have the slightest clue how legal proceedings work. In order for TMAN to be guilty of libel, he must have said something that is observably disprovable. He must have said something as a statement of fact that can be proven as untrue. Since he doesn't even know who Thule is, it's impossible to prove or disprove anything about him (even if it's a him). And even if Thules identity was discovered after the fact it wouldn't matter because he made his statements about Thule prior to discovery.
Pretty lame QS, even for you.
If you were to go up to a random person on the street and say they are cheating on their spouse, you would be slandering them (assuming this is untrue), even if you do not know who they are. If the person is not a "public figure" ignorance of the truth is not a defense to libel nor is relying on inaccurate information.
It is also possible to libel/slander a business, or an entity that is DBA (doing business as) in a particular trade name.
Why would you give somebody who is clearly slightly unhinged TMAN’s personal information?
technically he hasn't given any info.. anyway others seem far more concerned about this than I do.
Thule is mentally retarded, I bet if we got his medical records it would show a concerned doctor listing all 7 major kind of retardations. don't worry about it, thule couldn't raise an erection never-mind a legal case against me
He PM’ed me a few days ago asking me to confirm if your country of residence was one of two countries you lived in — he said he found someone to sell your dox and was trying to arrange escrow. I asked him what he was going to do with the information and he responded that he planned on filling a lawsuit (presumably for libel) against you. I told him I was away from my computer and would get back to him. I forgot about his request and he messaged me to follow up, I responded that if he gave me what he received I could confirm if it is correct — I haven’t received a response.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
Why would you give somebody who is clearly slightly unhinged TMAN’s personal information?
QS, I used to really, really respect you but it seems you’re always around to be semi helpful to the likes of cryptohunter, Thule etc, why?
I do think he has a case for libel.
Thats absolute bullshit. Libel against who? You can't libel somebody if you don't know who you're libeling. One anonymous accounts words towards another has never been grounds for libel.
There are a number of defenses TMAN could argue to lower/eliminate his liability, such as his rating only played a small incremental impact on Thules reputation (a court may find that everyone who left him a negative is jointly and severally liable), that Thule only discusses one type of topic and is unappealing to advertisers, is unappealing to advertisers for another reason, or that Thule is a (limited purpose) public figure as defined by libel law changing the threshold for libel.
It is my understanding that TMAN has a decent amount of money and it is my opinion that TMAN is aware of the risks and has decided to continue libeling Thule understanding the risks.
The only thing you actually said here was that you dont have the slightest clue how legal proceedings work. In order for TMAN to be guilty of libel, he must have said something that is observably disprovable. He must have said something as a statement of fact that can be proven as untrue. Since he doesn't even know who Thule is, it's impossible to prove or disprove anything about him (even if it's a him). And even if Thules identity was discovered after the fact it wouldn't matter because he made his statements about Thule prior to discovery.
Pretty lame QS, even for you.
I do think he has a case for libel.
Thats absolute bullshit. Libel against who? You can't libel somebody if you don't know who you're libeling. One anonymous accounts words towards another has never been grounds for libel.
There are a number of defenses TMAN could argue to lower/eliminate his liability, such as his rating only played a small incremental impact on Thules reputation (a court may find that everyone who left him a negative is jointly and severally liable), that Thule only discusses one type of topic and is unappealing to advertisers, is unappealing to advertisers for another reason, or that Thule is a (limited purpose) public figure as defined by libel law changing the threshold for libel.
It is my understanding that TMAN has a decent amount of money and it is my opinion that TMAN is aware of the risks and has decided to continue libeling Thule understanding the risks.
Have you actually read the tag from me fella? Whilst this is all fun and games Thule has bigger problems than me tagging them.
I do think he has a case for libel.
Thats absolute bullshit. Libel against who? You can't libel somebody if you don't know who you're libeling. One anonymous accounts words towards another has never been grounds for libel.
There are a number of defenses TMAN could argue to lower/eliminate his liability, such as his rating only played a small incremental impact on Thules reputation (a court may find that everyone who left him a negative is jointly and severally liable), that Thule only discusses one type of topic and is unappealing to advertisers, is unappealing to advertisers for another reason, or that Thule is a (limited purpose) public figure as defined by libel law changing the threshold for libel.
It is my understanding that TMAN has a decent amount of money and it is my opinion that TMAN is aware of the risks and has decided to continue libeling Thule understanding the risks.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
Well, one of you needs to file, because right now you are just a couple of confirmed liars.
You think any lawyer reviewing any of your alt accounts would file? He/She would lose all respect in the legal community. Who cares what you think? Livecoin?
My beloved Stompix you would have been right if we would have the year 2013 since you gave regulations from 2012 as evidence.
I would recommend looking for up to date regulations.
Sincerly Thule
Here they are!I would recommend looking for up to date regulations.
Sincerly Thule
Quote
Article 71b
The jurisdiction of a common court shall be determined as follows:
(1)
a common court shall have jurisdiction where, under this Regulation, the courts of a Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court would have jurisdiction in a matter governed by that instrument;
(2)
where the defendant is not domiciled in a Member State, and this Regulation does not otherwise confer jurisdiction over him, Chapter II shall apply as appropriate regardless of the defendant’s domicile.
Application may be made to a common court for provisional, including protective, measures even if the courts of a third State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter;
(3)
where a common court has jurisdiction over a defendant under point 2 in a dispute relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage within the Union, that court may also exercise jurisdiction in relation to damage arising outside the Union from such an infringement.
Such jurisdiction may only be established if property belonging to the defendant is located in any Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court and the dispute has a sufficient connection with any such Member State.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014R0542The jurisdiction of a common court shall be determined as follows:
(1)
a common court shall have jurisdiction where, under this Regulation, the courts of a Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court would have jurisdiction in a matter governed by that instrument;
(2)
where the defendant is not domiciled in a Member State, and this Regulation does not otherwise confer jurisdiction over him, Chapter II shall apply as appropriate regardless of the defendant’s domicile.
Application may be made to a common court for provisional, including protective, measures even if the courts of a third State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter;
(3)
where a common court has jurisdiction over a defendant under point 2 in a dispute relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage within the Union, that court may also exercise jurisdiction in relation to damage arising outside the Union from such an infringement.
Such jurisdiction may only be established if property belonging to the defendant is located in any Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court and the dispute has a sufficient connection with any such Member State.
Note: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32012R1215 is still in force.
Quote
(15)
The rules of jurisdiction should be highly predictable and founded on the principle that jurisdiction is generally based on the defendant’s domicile. Jurisdiction should always be available on this ground save in a few well-defined situations in which the subject-matter of the dispute or the autonomy of the parties warrants a different connecting factor. The domicile of a legal person must be defined autonomously so as to make the common rules more transparent and avoid conflicts of jurisdiction.
(16)
In addition to the defendant’s domicile, there should be alternative grounds of jurisdiction based on a close connection between the court and the action or in order to facilitate the sound administration of justice. The existence of a close connection should ensure legal certainty and avoid the possibility of the defendant being sued in a court of a Member State which he could not reasonably have foreseen. This is important, particularly in disputes concerning non-contractual obligations arising out of violations of privacy and rights relating to personality, including defamation.
The rules of jurisdiction should be highly predictable and founded on the principle that jurisdiction is generally based on the defendant’s domicile. Jurisdiction should always be available on this ground save in a few well-defined situations in which the subject-matter of the dispute or the autonomy of the parties warrants a different connecting factor. The domicile of a legal person must be defined autonomously so as to make the common rules more transparent and avoid conflicts of jurisdiction.
(16)
In addition to the defendant’s domicile, there should be alternative grounds of jurisdiction based on a close connection between the court and the action or in order to facilitate the sound administration of justice. The existence of a close connection should ensure legal certainty and avoid the possibility of the defendant being sued in a court of a Member State which he could not reasonably have foreseen. This is important, particularly in disputes concerning non-contractual obligations arising out of violations of privacy and rights relating to personality, including defamation.
He PM’ed me a few days ago asking me to confirm if your country of residence was one of two countries you lived in — he said he found someone to sell your dox and was trying to arrange escrow. I asked him what he was going to do with the information and he responded that he planned on filling a lawsuit (presumably for libel) against you. I told him I was away from my computer and would get back to him. I forgot about his request and he messaged me to follow up, I responded that if he gave me what he received I could confirm if it is correct — I haven’t received a response.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.
Anyways TMAN like i said the clock is running tic tac tic tac
Ummm, didn't you say the same thing to me over and over a few months ago?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47505377
You did nothing then - you'll do nothing now.
So you are manipulating the thread by deleting my replies to your posts ?Don't like the answer to be public ?
Anyways TMAN like i said the clock is running tic tac tic tac
Anyways TMAN like i said the clock is running tic tac tic tac
What is your clock running away from? At least it has fresh breath.
links to bs
My dear troll, I know I'm wasting my time here but maybe, who knows..
1) I gave you a direct link to the EU justice website where there are all the details on how civil lawsuits happen in the EU
2) You clearly have no experience with those, you have not talked to a lawyer, you have no wife that is a lawyer, probably you have no wife and probably ...add a lot more stuff here
3) Remember this, if you would have talked to a lawyer, the FIRST thing he would have told you would have been to cease all communication with the other party and only discuss through him. Do you honestly want us to believe a lawyer would take your case after you posted home you know the home address of members here and you're going to do whatever you dreamed of?
4) Since civil law is not your point, think about physics better and Newton's third law, as the forum reacts just like that.
You started a mess trying to somehow convince people to clean your trust wall, what you have managed is to expose yourself to even more members, add more red trust and make a lot more people who didn't even know you previously aware what kind of person you are.
You are the big mouth Thule, all talk no action. Anyway pics of wife or she isn’t real
Curiosity killed the cat, and if it won't kill you I'm willing to bet it will make you at least throw up till the next block halving
My beloved Stompix you would have been right if we would have the year 2013 since you gave regulations from 2012 as evidence.
I would recommend looking for up to date regulations.
Sincerly Thule
links to bs
My dear troll, I know I'm wasting my time here but maybe, who knows..
1) I gave you a direct link to the EU justice website where there are all the details on how civil lawsuits happen in the EU
2) You clearly have no experience with those, you have not talked to a lawyer, you have no wife that is a lawyer, probably you have no wife and probably ...add a lot more stuff here
3) Remember this, if you would have talked to a lawyer, the FIRST thing he would have told you would have been to cease all communication with the other party and only discuss through him. Do you honestly want us to believe a lawyer would take your case after you posted home you know the home address of members here and you're going to do whatever you dreamed of?
4) Since civil law is not your point, think about physics better and Newton's third law, as the forum reacts just like that.
You started a mess trying to somehow convince people to clean your trust wall, what you have managed is to expose yourself to even more members, add more red trust and make a lot more people who didn't even know you previously aware what kind of person you are.
You are the big mouth Thule, all talk no action. Anyway pics of wife or she isn’t real
Curiosity killed the cat, and if it won't kill you I'm willing to bet it will make you at least throw up till the next block halving
Jump to: