The tradeoff is that tax havens generally don't have a lot of actual regulation since their sole purpose is to attract foreign investment into the gaming industry, and to sit there and collect any taxation revenues coming their way.
i think that's every government wants and so as the operators?gain players and earn more?what would be the other motive behind these kind of changing rules?
As long as they are getting their share, they wouldn't mind letting shady operators retain their license.
I think cambodia is strict in their policies so this is not just about shady operators but instead to gain more players.
But if this is not an issue, then I'm all for it. It makes a lot of sense for these developing nations to secure FDIs whenever they possibly can, and the gambling industry is certainly a big fish to fry if they can successfully attract a few to register there (if companies deem lower taxes as a sufficient tradeoff less regulatory stability, that is).
Cambodia wanted to be close in the competition of great gambling countries.Macau is not far from them same as singapore and Philippines so they wanted to get closer to compete with them internationally .