Topic: Campaign to exclude Vod from DT. Please join me. (Read 1069 times)

Sounds like an idea for a Twilight Zone "Choose your own adventure" book.  Your choices have always been your own but calling more people pedophiles will not decriminalize it.

Indeed.  I wonder if I made a website doxxing suchmoon full of lies and threatened to have her killed repeatedly on this forum if LoyceV would then include me in his DT list, or if that's only reserved for people who engage in this behavior against me?  We all know the answer...  This is a DT problem.  People that suffer from mental illness being on this forum is inevitable.  Adding those people to DT in order to terrorize honest people you are jealous of is pathetic behavior that needs to be addressed in this community. 

You seem to have a cringy combination of overinflated ego and victim mentality. I don't recall when was the last time I PMed mods about anything but sure as shit it wasn't about you. I did report some of your posts and if it contributed to getting your kulmena account banned - that's wonderful.

Oh no!!
Not 2,000 Twitter followers for me to care what they think!!
Please have mercy on me..

The problem is that you Vod (pedo) eddie13 (gay-hooker) suchmoon (lesbian) sent countless pm's to mods with a request to ban me, My true is too uncomfortable for you because one of you is running a ponzi scheme, another one was running a scam coin and a scam exchange, third one was involved in a huge scam and now is running an illegal betting website in texas. For me is just a fun to watch your reactions to my posts LOL. Now I'm working on a new website where everything will be brought to public, since it is not allowed to publish some personal info here. I will make it popular via some seo and social platforms advertising.Plus my more than 2000 followers on Twitter.So very soon you gonna be very popular. P.S. Wby vod is not tagged for the threats of killing OG via showing some documents to "radicals" Anyone else out of dt would be tagged countless times. Double standards huh?

Vod should be scared because when this scary Russian guy called all the lawyers and shit on me they interrogated me for 6 weeks straight..

NOT!!

What a jerkoff loser..

Kruglikov lied (Og - I'm sure you knew that) but it did make me realize that one day a vigilante group might not review the history and believe these claims.  So I have decided to document the ongoing pedophile promotion on this forum before it all vanishes into history.   

Going forward, I have decided to accept OgNasty's continued offer of helping fundraise for my health, and hope all the Nastyfans out there will help promote my (loaded?) book on youtube and other social media!

Unless you're horny, then you realize you could be him.   

I can't claim to know what OG will or will not do.

It seems you are going around in circles.

Let me recap.

1. I'm not OG
2. I've seen no credible or strong evidence that you are a pedo
3. I've not seen OG claim you are a pedo but pedo is not criminal anyway so you should not be reported.

Therefore until any of those things are supported by independently verifiable evidence I am not sure what to think.

You look stupid claiming all of those things without producing evidence when called upon.

Understand that. Then work from there.

Or what OG?  You'll shame me as a pedo but recommend no one charge me criminally?   

Produce please. Now.

Yes OG, Vod has the evidence.   So do many others - do you forget every post is recorded other than by Theymos?

Evidence vod that OG has said this not you just repeating yourself.

Bring some independently verifiable evidence.

If not you are trolling OG.

Not to mention claiming he should be killed?

Are you off your meds.

Can we consider this as a official death threat from you against OG? (Screenshotted) And the first person they will visit it's you as I understood. Call police Martin and ask for protection and purchase some surveillance cameras.

The question of if a rating is good or bad is subjective. Different people view things different ways. Someone not defending a questionable rating is a sign they don't actually believe in the rating, but are rather leaving the rating up for personal reasons.

Og's death will be on your hands if the radicals get to him first.   Hope he has bullet proof windows.  :/

This is so absurdly specific, probably a projection based on something you've done.

A bad rating/flag is bad regardless if it's defended by the person who posted it, "supporters", sockpuppets, what have you. A good rating/flag is good regardless of who may try to discredit it.

Yes Martin I contacted all of them. Also I was chatting with a head of this Alliance https://www.facebook.com/antipedoalliance/ He promised me to investigate that matter. I did that because a lot of people including me are really interested if you are really guilty of that accusations or not. And I do not care how you will explain your past and present activities to any law enforcement. And yes Pedophilia is a crime.

Activities related to the sexual exploitation of children, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for not less than 30 years or for life.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2251

Enjoi...

I think it should be clarified that there is a substantial difference between preemptively tagging someone and subsequently removing a tag after further consideration and/or additional evidence coming to light, and tagging someone wrongly and leaving the tag on the account.

In this case, I have not seen any posts from Vod even trying to defend his tag, and I have not seen anyone who supports Vod ask him publicly to reconsider his tag, or to try to defend his tag. Over the years, there have been other similar cases, in which Vod left a questionable tag, and he was never even pressured to defend his tag, his defenders simply said that Vod has left a lot of good ratings in the past, and that they are going to look past the questionable tag. There have also been other situations in which someone received a questionable tag from Vod, handled the situation poorly, and subsequently received additional tags after trolling and/or deciding to rage quit. The later is especially bad for the community because it effectively removes people from the community really for no reason.

To answer your question, I think someone shouldn't be able to get away with many "bad ratings". I don't think this should be a percentage, but rather a raw number, and that number should be very low. I would also view a "bad rating" that is being defended but may not necessarily agree with differently than a "bad rating" in which is not being defended. IMO the later should be viewed much more harshly, and should not be tolerated.

kruglikov, I really hope you didn't do what you claimed:
Reported him with his real name to all organizations mentioned in reference. Please join me.

These organizations are used for revenge all the time like this, and they are well aware of what ripoffreport is.  If any law enforcement contacts recognize my name from the past (been online since the 90s) they will reach out and I'll have to show the threads that will probably get OGNasty injured.

Is that what you wanted?   Some people do think pedophilia is a crime, and they won't look fondly on his campaign to normalize it.