Topic: Can a gig economy serve as an edge against inflation? - page 2. (Read 242 times)

People deciding to work 9am-6pm is their priority, of course there are a lot of jobs within that timeframe that pays handsomely, so most persons don't really find the need to do an extra job, so in fighting inflation and high cost of living, what they do is that they mostly get things and pay for bills that are of utmost priority to them and cut down on unnecessary spending, In doing so they have less to spend and more to save. So there are different approaches to fight inflation, you just have to go for the one that best suits you.

Talking about school curriculum and teaching only courses that are exactly the discipline of the students. In every education curriculum, there is always extra curriculum activities where student can  easily identify areas they can be good at, it can be sports, it can be entertainment and any other thing. Hence the school has identified the area at which the students can harness their skills outside academics whether sports or entertainment, you will see the school will begin to implement programs that will help them begin to improve on it and encourage the students on that. I think this has been a long practice mostly in high schools and sometimes even in the university that have helped people to identify their potentials and earn a living from it outside the day to day academic classes and routine.

Each job has its mode of operation and regardless of wether or not an economy chooses to be flexible in the way they carry out thier official working hours, jobs that require that you stay in the office throughout the time your service is required wouldn't  agree that you only come when you have a task to perform at the office.

Let's take for instance that you're in the teaching sector and by the timetable of the institution, you're to teach at certain time of the day and not even in all the days of the week. If you've never been in the teaching sector you would think this way that you can come around whichever time you have classes with the student but that's never how it works in real life setting.  Your responsibility as a tutor goes above just mere teaching and include other leadership and manageral roles that entails that you always make yourself available in the teaching environment even when you're not teaching. If you are skilled at a thing, it's left for you to manage the rest of the time your service isn't needed at the work place and not  that you are allowed to go home whenever you don't have lectures. So the student aren't going to be in class and will  only come around when they have a lecture that suites thier interest? What happens to the other things they have to learn from school like being disciplined and having the ability to network with others which is now a vital part of what's needed for you to survive In this era. It's not just in the teaching sector but almost in all sector, works aren't pre planned but as the day starts, jobs keeps coming in and that's when you start doing your job. It's just like saying that a medical doctor should only come to the hospital whenever a call comes through to him that there is a patient that needs his attention, how will he cope when cases of emergency come in?

I agree with this. A lot of jobs that require people to be in the office all day can be done from home so I don't see a point in them going into the office every day. It doesn't have to be 100% remote, workers can come into the office maybe 2 days a week and they can choose different days that can be convenient for them.
I find it funny when people say working from home reduces productivity. that's not true at all. If the system is very well managed to make workers feel comfortable working from home and channels are created where they can discuss freely and easily with their colleagues and clients then there would be productivity.
All that's needed is a good working environment.

Working remotely, with a flexible schedule, in a hybrid regime, and being a freelancer are all very different things that sometimes overlap and sometimes do not. I'm pointing it out because of the op's question of whether it would be better to visit the office for certain tasks instead of having a 9-6 job. Visiting the office occasionally can be a part of a full-time job with a hybrid regime, for example, and not necessarily a part of the gig economy.
In any case, I don't think it has much to do with inflation, because sometimes doing gigs means being precarious and having a very unstable income (while a full-time job might be a high-paying job).

gig economies only work if the "client" you operate with is paying you enough for your time and you also have enough jobs to accumilate

for instance doing a logo for $5 only works if you are not taking 30 minutes per job and have a waiting list of clients wanting a logo.. however if you end up consulting with the client for 30minutes to get design idea's and then 30 minutes to draw it and then you dont get another request for a few hours.. its not going to be better off than minimum wage

same goes for food delivery. if you get $5 per deliver per 15min delivery timeslot. it only works if you are less than 5 minutes from door to door. because adding in the drive to the restaurant te wait for the food prep the delivery to the customer.. and then waiting for another customer.. that $5 ends up being a per hour amount

So you are suggesting that the only solution to beat inflation is just... working more?
I wonder how the people in countries with hyperinflation are currently surviving. Do they work 100 hours a week in 5 different jobs?
If you live in a country with high cost of living, the smart solution would be to move into a country, where the inflation is low and find a job there. Working more in order to cover the higher cost of living is basically running faster throughout the "rat race".
I personally hate freelancing, even though I've worked as a freelancer several years ago. As a freelancer, you have no boss and you pick your worktime, but you will have to struggle to find your customers and you are about to compete with people, who are willing to do the same task for peanuts.

wow! what's this idea that one must have been  writing with AI that has almost become a trend when individual that haven't stayed too long on the forum shares there idea in a manner that's probably apt and well detailed? Even if this was my first thread on the forum, I would still have looked at this statement as a direct insult to my ability to think through a concept and put it out in a manner that passes my idea in a way that anyone who comes across it can vividly understand it. Does it mean one can't share his idea without necessarily making use of an AI?

Well, I will rather take this as a compliment and if you care to, you can easily run a plagiarism or AI check on this or any of my previous thread to be sure if your assumption ia right or wrong.

I have never and can never write with AI. It's never been my thing.

OP registered in 2022 and thus is relatively new.  It is rare that anyone who's registered in the last 8 years (and probably more) could put together such a coherent post as this.  My proboscis is detecting a strong scent of AI, though I would never rule out my paranoia being out of control.  Just sayin'.


Have you ever held a job?  I've had quite a few, and there hasn't been a single one where I could just drop by when I have a particular task to do.  And by the way, having to drop in to your main job to do the task and then quickly scoot out the back door to your 2-3 side hustles sounds maddeningly tiresome.  Even if you're young and are trying to earn as much money as possible, what you proposed just isn't feasible.

It's not gig economy that used to cope against inflation, but it simply you're lack of money, that's why you're looking for second or third jobs.

You're talking as an employees, so you're looking to make something more.

But, if you're an employer, you will do same to the employees because you're want to maximize the profit of your business.

Many companies force the employees to work full day because they're also forced by other companies in that city, working from 9AM - 6PM make the employees need to have lunch, so it will encourage them to have lunch in restaurant near the company you work.

If the companies not force to work full day, the restaurants might go bankrupt due to lack of customers.

Not every role can function in a gig economy, there are certain roles where the business needs permanent workers and not freelance or contract staffs. We already have a gig economy thriving in almost every part of the world and helping bridge the gap between different countries as you can market your skill from any part of the world you are in as long as that skill is competitive enough.

What I will like to see a lot more of is work-from-home settings for permanent roles. Just as was realized during the 2020 lockdown, productivity does not drop when workers do their jobs remotely. Many jobs are digital and can be done from the comfort of the home allowing the gig economy to thrive even more

Freelancing jobs are preferred by many because of the freedom that comes with it and the ability to combine it with other jobs which provides you multiple streams of income in the process. As inflation gains momentum by the day  in almost all the parts of the world, and job scarcity remains an issue, an economy that is more mobile and that gives workers the leverage to do up to three or two jobs mostly part-time would help them meet up with the high cost of living.

Wouldn't it be better that you only have to go to your office when you have a task to do and not the regular 9AM - 6PM routine even when you have nothing to do at office denying you the extra time to carry out your side hustle that can add up to the small salary most workers are being paid?

If our schools can work with this and make it less engaging for students to spend all thier times in classes but to rather identify areas they aren't good at and work on those area while the rest of the time is devoted into getting all soaked into learning a single skill or creating something for themselves, wouldn't it be better? With most institutions operating an educational system that has curriculum that's mostly outdated with course that are less relevant and yet taking up times that student can use in learning skills and adding values to themselves, it obviously calls for the need to look for better economic framework that will serve us better.

Coming from a region where the cost of living has skyrocked too high and having had experience that most workers are mere time consumers and not productive with those time and you're someone that's in that kind of setting but have the intention of doing more with your spare time, operating a gig economy that's same as a flexible economy could be the surest option.