its not in the dev guide nor the wiki, only found it in the bip code
bitcoin community voted for it with a hashpower. why don't you know about it? 
Im lazy and BIPs are boring.
Topic: Can anybody help me to confirm my transactions? (Read 1913 times)
Im lazy and BIPs are boring.
its not in the dev guide nor the wiki, only found it in the bip code
bitcoin community voted for it with a hashpower. why don't you know about it? I actually did. Can you (or anyone else) confirm: The TX can never confirm because tx.nversion must be >= 2, but its 1.
good. and bc.i does not check it with OP_CSV
no they don't, they don't even show the Version when decoding a raw tx.
its not in the dev guide nor the wiki, only found it in the bip code
I actually did. Can you (or anyone else) confirm: The TX can never confirm because tx.nversion must be >= 2, but its 1.
good. and bc.i does not check it with OP_CSV
We usually dont deal with TX that create this many sig-ops.
You should look deeper.I actually did. Can you (or anyone else) confirm: The TX can never confirm because tx.nversion must be >= 2, but its 1.
-> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0068.mediawiki
I came back here after seeing this -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1000-btc-giveaway-from-your-friend-rekcahxfb-1574127
We usually dont deal with TX that create this many sig-ops.
You should look deeper.I didnt look deeply into each TX so I might be missing something
Nobody looks deeply.We usually dont deal with TX that create this many sig-ops. Hope that does not spoil it for the others, but did you contact bc.i about it?
I didnt look deeply into each TX so I might be missing something
Nobody looks deeply.What is your point?
I want everyone to look deeply. -snip-
I am asking "What can I do to confirm them into blocks?"
-snip-
I am asking "What can I do to confirm them into blocks?"
-snip-
-snip-
It is confirmed. Go on.
It is confirmed. Go on.
Time to wait for the next in the chain -> https://blockchain.info/tx/f65d87013d8965128e0b6f304cf87480694b7622947b9c3a1c08c834befb5b45
Edit: might take a while...
I am fairly certain that you are playing stupid and that you know exactly why your transactions are not confirming.
1) What does 'stupid' means? (Sorry, google translate gives me very strange results)2) Yes, I know.
But I have a right to ask about it.
And I want to give you some knowledge.
I am asking "What can I do to confirm them into blocks?"
I am not asking "Why these transactions are unconfirmed?"
Okay, give me some knowledge. But I have a right to ask about it.
And I want to give you some knowledge.
I am asking "What can I do to confirm them into blocks?"
I am not asking "Why these transactions are unconfirmed?"
It looks like you might have "forgotten" to sign f65d87013d8965128e0b6f304cf87480694b7622947b9c3a1c08c834befb5b45 with your multisig addresses.
Quote
I am fairly certain that you intentionally created an invalid transaction that will never confirm
that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid.
that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid.
I am fairly certain that Satoshi Nakamoto intentionally created an 'financial system' that will never success
that some people treats as revolutionary technology.
Go on.
Quote
The transaction in question that needs to get confirmed is 519a70ba4ac00303a97bedfd82bec31f288773a16603f57ced0f8b7522e5e32d, and no I will not get it confirmed for you.
It is confirmed. Go on.The rawtx for f65d87013d8965128e0b6f304cf87480694b7622947b9c3a1c08c834befb5b45 is:
Code:
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
I am fairly certain that you are playing stupid and that you know exactly why your transactions are not confirming.
In that case, I may have spent a bit too much time in an attempt to help out. That's unfortunate, thanks for pointing that out.I am fairly certain that you intentionally created an invalid transaction that will never confirm that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid.
There was no indication of anything 'invalid' about that transactions that needed confirmation, thus it has finally confirmed. From what I had seen, the fees we just generally a bit lower than expected and it took a bit longer to confirm.I am fairly certain that Satoshi Nakamoto intentionally created an 'financial system' that will never success that some people treats as revolutionary technology.
You don't understand the values of this technologies, however that is a subject for another thread. I am fairly certain that you are playing stupid and that you know exactly why your transactions are not confirming.
1) What does 'stupid' means? (Sorry, google translate gives me very strange results)2) Yes, I know.
But I have a right to ask about it.
And I want to give you some knowledge.
I am asking "What can I do to confirm them into blocks?"
I am not asking "Why these transactions are unconfirmed?"
Quote
I am fairly certain that you intentionally created an invalid transaction that will never confirm
that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid.
that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid.
I am fairly certain that Satoshi Nakamoto intentionally created an 'financial system' that will never success
that some people treats as revolutionary technology.
Go on.
Quote
The transaction in question that needs to get confirmed is 519a70ba4ac00303a97bedfd82bec31f288773a16603f57ced0f8b7522e5e32d, and no I will not get it confirmed for you.
It is confirmed. Go on. What can I do to confirm them into blocks?
I am fairly certain that you are playing stupid and that you know exactly why your transactions are not confirming. I am fairly certain that you intentionally created an invalid transaction that will never confirm that some block explorers (including blockchain.info) treats as valid. The transaction in question that needs to get confirmed is 519a70ba4ac00303a97bedfd82bec31f288773a16603f57ced0f8b7522e5e32d, and no I will not get it confirmed for you.
I do not use wallet.
I create transactions by hands
Really? Then I assume that you use blockchain.info to push your transactions? That might be the reason for which I don't see them on other explorers yet.I create transactions by hands
WTF?
I see only -32 / -5 trust rating in my profile
This is off-topic to this thread and should not be discussed here. These ratings depend on the trust settings of each user. I see only -32 / -5 trust rating in my profile
The first problem that I see here is:
WTF?I see only -32 / -5 trust rating in my profile
Okay, so next time increase the fees a bit and it should be fine. May I ask what wallet you are using?
I do not use wallet.I create transactions by hands
Isn't 0.0002 BTC for 458 bytes enough?
20000 satoshis for 458 equates to ~43 satoshis/byte which is under the recommended 70 satoshis/byte now. However, there aren't that many unconfirmed transactions in these ranges at the moment so it should be fine. However, increasing the fee is recommended in case that you want very quick confirmations. I assume that the address in question "3BpHnKpc4GeufHTepDBfnirCD22WRqVGii" isn't yours?
This is my address. I assume that the address in question "3BpHnKpc4GeufHTepDBfnirCD22WRqVGii" isn't yours?
If that is the case, then increasing your own fees wouldn't actually do anything.
This is my address.If that is the case, then increasing your own fees wouldn't actually do anything.
But you may use it also, if you wish.
Should I increase fees?
I assume that the address in question "3BpHnKpc4GeufHTepDBfnirCD22WRqVGii" isn't yours? If that is the case, then increasing your own fees wouldn't actually do anything.Isn't 0.0002 BTC for 458 bytes enough?
That seems fine. More information is coming in the next post. The problem starts at this TX, since one of the inputs is not confirmed.
Should I increase fees?Isn't 0.0002 BTC for 458 bytes enough?
Jump to: