The security of Bitcoin still hangs in the balance considering the prevalence of theft associated with it by hackers. Whether we agree or not, Bitcoin is highly risky indulging in. Apart from the slow confirmation and backlog of unconfirmed transactions, we still battle with stolen and hacked wallets. The technicalities involving how Bitcoin works are not easily understood by many, especially the illiterate ones. I really don't think Bitcoin is a secured way of handling cash. The banks are better.
Yes since its because we might gonna lose some money if theirs something bad flactuation happening on it and you can make this current event as a basis on all of this, since if those people bought for the high price and drop the same as now surely they will lose some money with that thats why I can call bitcoin as safe so same as you i would recommend bank so that we can feel secure and we can depend on them interms of security.
If we use banks to save our Bitcoin then we have defeated the purpose of decentralization in the first place and everything is centralized and so we cannot enjoy the 24/7 accessibility of Bitcoin likewise we have to follow long queues to make deposits or withdrawals plus limitations are going to be placed on amount for eligible withdrawals and a whole lot so to me we are better off without the banks else we shouldn't even call it Bitcoin but something else.