Well, honestly i think that that is just impossible to happen, because the way i see it, banks are just like living things that adapt to its surroundings. And its form of adaptation to its bitcoin problem would probably be befriending his enemy instead and try to focus more on the benefits it can get from bitcoins rather than the minor issues that it hates. But if ever it so happens that banks really do disappear, then my friend, we'd already be long gone by then, along with all our grea great great great great grand children..
But hey, i havent studied bitcoins and banks that much, that's just my opinion regarding the topic, so yeah, i ain't a good source for infos. Just sayin'
You're basically saying that those are just your availability heuristics. You used your imagination without relying to any information or without conducting any research at all. I think that we're far from what you're thinking.
The banks can adopt bitcoins, everyone can adopt bitcoins, but will they? We will be long gone before those questions are going to be answered. It just seems so ironic if the banks start using bitcoin because the whole point of bitcoin is removing the use of trusted third parties such as the bank. We'll be back to square one if people started using bitcoins through the banks.
Yea my friend, you are right. I havent studied about bitcoins and banks too much. But, it doesnt mean that i dont know sht about these things, what i was trying to point out is that i don't know ot all yet abput these things. Hope that clears up a what you thought of me.
Now, back to my post, yes i agree a bit, you have a point there my pal, but just think about it, if banks continue to ignore and disregard the existence of bitcoins akd other crypto currencies that is all around. It will raise eyebrows and would probably make the people get into it more than using the banks. Coz let's face it, technologies are improving day by day and it wont be impossible for bitcoins and other crypto currencies to have better mechanics in terms of confirmations of transactions, accessibility etc.. now you see, my point here pal is that if a man if thirsty as fck and he ran put of water he'll be left out of choices but to ask for water from anyone he sees even when it means he has to ask from his enemy. That is also how the banks would play when time comes. They will ignore the negatives of brc to them and focus more on the benefits they can get while at the same time finding ways to increase those benefits.
Hope i explained it well now.