After Bitcoin managed to break through the $100k mark, various assumptions emerged about Bitcoin's potential in the future, whether Bitcoin could replace gold as a store of value or not. If we draw a line back since its inception, Bitcoin's market capitalization has soared by ±350,000%, far surpassing gold which is a traditional safe haven asset, so this fact shows that Bitcoin has the potential to become a more valuable asset than gold.
Although volatility and skepticism still pose challenges for investors trying to hold large amounts of Bitcoin for the long term, Bitcoin has been recognized and trusted by Investors as a future asset with the potential to replace gold as the primary store of value. Some people still argue that gold is still a more reliable safe haven asset because it has a long history and intrinsic value, but that is just their assumption and I don't want to argue about it because in life there are always pros and cons to everything.
There is no denying that when looking at the growth of bitcoin, it is not difficult to understand why many are rushing to declare that bitcoin will soon surpass gold at this rate. But what guarantees and certainty do you have that bitcoin will be able to maintain steady growth until it surpasses gold? Not to mention, the gap between these two assets is huge and gold will not stand still and let bitcoin surpass it. As romero121 said: gold's capitalization increased by more than 7 trillion from 2021 to 2024, while bitcoin only increased by more than 1 trillion.
People who say gold is a safe haven, a more reliable asset, they are just stating what is actually happening, they are not making assumptions. Those who think bitcoin will surpass gold, they are the ones making assumption because bitcoin is still very small compared to gold at the moment.
Bitcoin surpassing gold is not a simple matter, let's be realistic.