I also believe that e-voting is a bad idea, blockchain (or any jargon) included. Here's the thing, you can't make sure somebody vote without knowing their identity at one point or the other, and who knows what exactly happens in the machine or the code itself. It is difficult to trust the code especially if the government is the one who made it. Somebody can cast doubt over the machine and then everyone would start doubting the entire election itself.
Tom Scott made a good video about this (about e-voting in general but I believe the risk is the same)[1].
[1]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQsThe world systems can't remain rigid that's why we have technology invented with the purpose of disrupting or upgrading the traditional systems.
In this case, I believe e-voting powered by Blockchain technology is possible if we have independent community that'll be in charge of the process. This committee should be evaluated by another body in order to achieve the goal of devoting...
~~~~
No country will allow a third party to handle its election blockchain
Who then will create the blockchain ? is it the ruling party ? or its opponent? or private citizen ?
Yeah, that's the opposite of the idea. What's need is a multi -committee system were the composition consists of ruling party, opposition party, citizen etc. This will help to prevent unfair or shady acts by the members because they are from different group and with diverse ideologies.
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]