Can companies that produce mining equipment use devices?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: coolcoinz on February 17, 2017, 06:21:42 AM

They can do it and they are doing it. KNC were accused of such mining in the past. I also think BFL, which was a scam on many levels, also purposely delayed shipping to mine for themselves.
This is a great way to make money if you don't care about the company's reputation, but are entering the market for a quick buck.

the knc case was different, because they were directly producing their asic i remember this, therefore they were testing it quickly after the production is complete, i see no issue with this

yes maybe they went to far with testing of some product, and delivered it later but it's different than what BFL did, which is plan scamming customers

coin revolution

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: isoneguy on February 03, 2017, 01:50:24 PM

I don't think it's polite to bank on the miners taking the loss.

That's disrespectful to the people supporting your product line.

Moral standing would imply that you share the benefits with those buying your products.

To each their own...

Yes this is what it should be. But not all people depend on ethical values. Humanity is a bit greedy. Everyone may not be as good as you.
They can think of their own interests. They may not depend on ethical values. There is a lot of news about companies violating ethical rules.

That's why I do not really trust the firm.

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2814

Merit: 1192

They can do it and they are doing it. KNC were accused of such mining in the past. I also think BFL, which was a scam on many levels, also purposely delayed shipping to mine for themselves.
This is a great way to make money if you don't care about the company's reputation, but are entering the market for a quick buck.

Xester

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 544

Yes they are using those devices but for quality control and testing. They are doing it to test the functionality and the durability of the items. But they are not doing for very long but just in a short span of time. Without any test conducted there is a tendency that we can purchase items that are defective and is not working. But rest assured they are not selling second hand devices.

BtcoinSpider

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 36

I understand what are your question.

Yes, then can use.

Just like a ferrari manufacturer's can produce ferrari but, can choose to go with smaller car i.e fiat to reduce cost.

I think they do what they are doing based on passion not base solely on profit.

Thks
Btcoinspider

fitty

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 501

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: isoneguy on February 03, 2017, 01:50:24 PM

I don't think it's polite to bank on the miners taking the loss.

That's disrespectful to the people supporting your product line.

Moral standing would imply that you share the benefits with those buying your products.

To each their own...

Yeah. I also think that was a wrong thing to do. Especially, they are the producers of a certain mining equipment. It is their responsibility to attain the good quality of the product. They should only test the equipment to check if it is in the good quality and not to earn bitcoins. If so, they should just make their equipment and configure to mine bitcoin or any altcoin and not to sell those products but instead, just mine bitcoins.

isoneguy

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 501

I don't think it's polite to bank on the miners taking the loss.

That's disrespectful to the people supporting your product line.

Moral standing would imply that you share the benefits with those buying your products.

To each their own...

just_Alice

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 622

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 12:45:20 PM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 11:39:19 AM

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 11:31:04 AM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 10:38:23 AM

Yes that is how they "test" them.

What I would like to say is that they can use the devices for a certain period of time, extract the bitcoin and then sell it later.
I don't say: product quality testing.

Yes that is what they do when they """""""""""""""test""""""""""""""" them to make sure they work before shipping to customers. There may be some unseen delays in getting products to purchasers because of these """""""""""""""tests""""""""""""""" last longer than expected.

I'm not talking about from it.

For example, the BitMain company is now selling the S9.
But the bitmain company has the S10 on hand.
The S10 has been tested for quality control and is ready to be sold to customers.
But Bitmain wants to sell the S9 on the market first.
The customer does not know his S10.
Bitmain is doing bitcoin mining with the S10 device.
On the one hand, the S11 device is being developed.
After completing the development of the device S11, it is selling the device S10.

That's what I want to tell you. I do not know how else I can tell you more clearly.

Most likely they are doing something like this because it looks logical. Only I've never heard someone comlaining about receiving a used miner insteed of a new one so even if they are doing this they are doing it very cautiously.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: CloudStrife on January 31, 2017, 04:14:44 PM

I think it happens, and I think the best way to reduce the chances of this happening is the emergence of more competition in the market, so that users could invest in companies that do not make the equipment available after a long time, when the difficulty of mining is already higher. Companies making things more difficult would have to adjust.

There usually HAS been competition - the last half of last year was a very uncommon period.

Down side - miners get cheaper when there is significant competiton, means more get sold (as long as the production capasity is available) so hashrate goes UP a lot faster 'till the point of "marginal for ROI achievement" is reached for most, then it slows a some 'till the "major farms don't see ROI happening on new gear" range and it slows down a LOT.

megynacuna

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 253

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 10:24:07 AM

Can the companies that produce mining machines use the devices for a certain period and then drive them to the market?
They may first use the level of difficulty they have developed themselves and then sell it later.

I'm very certain that's what had been going on because the new devices themselves needs to be tested and hence if they do test and seems to be mining more blocks than the others sometimes it's possible they might want to stay-in and keep using for a certain time before they finally let it out to the market.

alh

legendary

Activity: 1846

Merit: 1052

Quote from: QuintLeo on January 31, 2017, 04:06:45 PM

And the jeans (Levi Strauss reference).

So for Bitcoin mining would that be a robe and slippers?

Very little "dirty" mining for most folks......

CloudStrife

sr. member

Activity: 256

Merit: 250

I think it happens, and I think the best way to reduce the chances of this happening is the emergence of more competition in the market, so that users could invest in companies that do not make the equipment available after a long time, when the difficulty of mining is already higher. Companies making things more difficult would have to adjust.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

And the jeans (Levi Strauss reference).

nikkisnowe

member

Activity: 105

Merit: 10

The ASIC mining manufacturers understand a lesson learned over 150 years ago. It's not the miners that get rich, it's the guy selling the shovels.

coin revolution

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Betwrong on January 29, 2017, 11:49:22 AM

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 12:45:20 PM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 11:39:19 AM

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 11:31:04 AM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 10:38:23 AM

Yes that is how they "test" them.

What I would like to say is that they can use the devices for a certain period of time, extract the bitcoin and then sell it later.
I don't say: product quality testing.

Yes that is what they do when they """""""""""""""test""""""""""""""" them to make sure they work before shipping to customers. There may be some unseen delays in getting products to purchasers because of these """""""""""""""tests""""""""""""""" last longer than expected.

I'm not talking about from it.

For example, the BitMain company is now selling the S9.
But the bitmain company has the S10 on hand.
The S10 has been tested for quality control and is ready to be sold to customers.
But Bitmain wants to sell the S9 on the market first.
The customer does not know his S10.
Bitmain is doing bitcoin mining with the S10 device.
On the one hand, the S11 device is being developed.
After completing the development of the device S11, it is selling the device S10.

That's what I want to tell you. I do not know how else I can tell you more clearly.

Let's be realistic. These days if that was happening we'd already know about it for sure. Someone from Bitmain would tell about it on a forum, especially if that person was fired from the company. But even if he wasn't he could do it anonymously. I think it's impossible to keep a secret that big without leaks.

They can do prevent this with deterrent work contracts. If they are doing something like this, they can do it without sharing it with all the employees.

Of course, mine is just an assumption. There is no evidence that the companies have done anything like this. If it was me, I could.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 2198

I stand with Ukraine.

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 12:45:20 PM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 11:39:19 AM

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 11:31:04 AM

Quote from: 0xfff on January 27, 2017, 10:38:23 AM

Yes that is how they "test" them.

What I would like to say is that they can use the devices for a certain period of time, extract the bitcoin and then sell it later.
I don't say: product quality testing.

Yes that is what they do when they """""""""""""""test""""""""""""""" them to make sure they work before shipping to customers. There may be some unseen delays in getting products to purchasers because of these """""""""""""""tests""""""""""""""" last longer than expected.

I'm not talking about from it.

For example, the BitMain company is now selling the S9.
But the bitmain company has the S10 on hand.
The S10 has been tested for quality control and is ready to be sold to customers.
But Bitmain wants to sell the S9 on the market first.
The customer does not know his S10.
Bitmain is doing bitcoin mining with the S10 device.
On the one hand, the S11 device is being developed.
After completing the development of the device S11, it is selling the device S10.

That's what I want to tell you. I do not know how else I can tell you more clearly.

Let's be realistic. These days if that was happening we'd already know about it for sure. Someone from Bitmain would tell about it on a forum, especially if that person was fired from the company. But even if he wasn't he could do it anonymously. I think it's impossible to keep a secret that big without leaks.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

BitFury, Bitmain, BW.com (Lketc), and KNC were known to have their own farms (KNC is dead now though).
Innosilicon appears to not have a farm.
Not sure on Caanan.

Bitmain has a history of putting a "used gear" sale up for about a month on their then-current model before they introduce a new model for sale to the public.

n691309

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1001

Quote from: coin revolution on January 27, 2017, 10:24:07 AM

Can the companies that produce mining machines use the devices for a certain period and then drive them to the market?
They may first use the level of difficulty they have developed themselves and then sell it later.

Not that they can, but they do it. They mine with the new devices, test if everything goes well and then decide to sell that device or not, we know that mining rigs/equipment are not cheap so if a series of mining rigs fails then it would be bad for their company reputation. And I think that if the bitcoin difficulty increases rapidly within a short period of time then a mining rig series is being tested.

equator

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ironm@n on January 28, 2017, 05:14:49 PM

I think there are companies doing this, after all, they can in that way make a significant profit, and then sell the equipment when they realize that the difficulty of mining is about to increase. I think the best way to avoid this kind of injury is to try to design your own mining equipment, I think there are only a few people with knowledge to do this, but it is possible.

As not everyone can design the mining equipment , that is why due to this reason is that they are approaching the manufacturer of the mining equipment and the manufacturer in the name of testing will first start mining the coin and after some days , they just pack it back in the box and send it to the buyer of the equipment. Because without mining they cannot find the result of the equipment

ironm@n

sr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 250

I think there are companies doing this, after all, they can in that way make a significant profit, and then sell the equipment when they realize that the difficulty of mining is about to increase. I think the best way to avoid this kind of injury is to try to design your own mining equipment, I think there are only a few people with knowledge to do this, but it is possible.

Topic: Can companies that produce mining equipment use devices? (Read 2748 times)