Can making a wallet make you rich? | Bitcointalksearch.org

webtricks

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1759

Quote from: hack3rcon on August 16, 2022, 11:45:09 PM

Hello,
Thank you so much for all replies.

How about the transaction fee? Any wallet with the zero transaction fee?

Note: Wallet (non-custodial) doesn't charge the transaction fee, you are paying the network fee.

There are plenty of wallets which will let you sign and broadcast transactions with zero transaction fee, with or without below relay fee! error. @PowerGlove has beautifully explained above what relay fee means. But when you are making wallet, the main stress should be on usability. A good fee suggestion algorithm and low/high fee warnings according to it are the desirable features from the wallet. If that system is in place then the wallet can let the users select any fee (even zero if they want).

Maus0728

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1563

Quote from: hack3rcon on August 16, 2022, 11:45:09 PM

How about the transaction fee? Any wallet with the zero transaction fee?

As far as I know, back in the day, some early blocks were able to broadcast zero fee transactions^[1], but those people could perhaps known to be miners and are not an average bitcoin joe. Plus, opting for zero tx fee would just harm miners in general.

You can just use Electrum for you to be able to have more control over your transaction fees though, or you could perhaps wait until the mempool^[2] gets cleared before sending bitcoin.

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/zero-fee-for-bitcoin-transaction-historical-data-5267378
[2] https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,24h,weight

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: sunsilk on August 17, 2022, 03:50:23 AM

The sad thing that I've noticed is that, there are still plenty of users with those custodial wallets and they're trusting it more than the non-custodial. I think the ratio compared to us that knew the differences of those isn't that big.

Maybe my use of the word "trend" is an overstatement. Still, from a couple of years ago when basically everybody (ok, don't take it ad-literam) had their coins at exchanges and other custodian wallets, the things are changing. Of course, some are lazy, careless or incapable to take care of their money (after all, it does require a bit of skill) and they still have their coins in others' hands.
But the charts about the funds leaving exchanges or the charts on how many hardware wallets are being bought do show a direction I like. We cannot expect wonders overnight, but the direction is good.

Quote from: sunsilk on August 17, 2022, 03:50:23 AM

But still, we'll never know what can happen to those funds if something goes wrong with those wallets or services that these people are trusting. Especially these days, it seems becoming common to see exchanges halting withdrawals and it's possible to happen with these custodial wallets.

True, there are plenty of topics on this matter here on bitcointalk. And if not all the people from the forum read/care/comply, then what could we expect from the outsiders?!

sunsilk

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 634

Quote from: NeuroticFish on August 17, 2022, 03:04:13 AM

Quote from: sunsilk on August 17, 2022, 02:29:14 AM

I've forgot to say and add that it's mostly on the custodial wallets. I've used a handful of them in the past years and had a comparison to the current network fee and to those wallets that I've used before and there's really sort of an additional to the base fee.

Although the market wasn't really that bad at all during those times and those fees weren't that much. Eventually, I've stopped using them and sticked to the non-custodial ones.

Then sorry if I was too harsh; as I said the "equation" is much different in case of custodian services. Also those usually get together with other services offered, squeezing some more cents here and there (like maybe getting tx fee for transferring funds between addresses of the same platform, but nothing actually done on-chain, hence all the fee money kept).

Just nowadays we advise everybody move off custodial platforms. Now the trend seems to be to oppose as much as possible the KYC and also be aware that "not your keys, not your coins", which all mean going away from custodial wallets.

There are very few niches available imho for a new custodian wallet. Maybe LN. It will not be easy for OP to start such a platform. He may even need backing from a financial institution and then he may become employee, which is far from the "getting rich" idea.

No problem, it was my bad I haven't reviewed what I've said before that post.

The sad thing that I've noticed is that, there are still plenty of users with those custodial wallets and they're trusting it more than the non-custodial. I think the ratio compared to us that knew the differences of those isn't that big.

But still, we'll never know what can happen to those funds if something goes wrong with those wallets or services that these people are trusting. Especially these days, it seems becoming common to see exchanges halting withdrawals and it's possible to happen with these custodial wallets.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: sunsilk on August 17, 2022, 02:29:14 AM

I've forgot to say and add that it's mostly on the custodial wallets. I've used a handful of them in the past years and had a comparison to the current network fee and to those wallets that I've used before and there's really sort of an additional to the base fee.

Although the market wasn't really that bad at all during those times and those fees weren't that much. Eventually, I've stopped using them and sticked to the non-custodial ones.

Then sorry if I was too harsh; as I said the "equation" is much different in case of custodian services. Also those usually get together with other services offered, squeezing some more cents here and there (like maybe getting tx fee for transferring funds between addresses of the same platform, but nothing actually done on-chain, hence all the fee money kept).

Just nowadays we advise everybody move off custodial platforms. Now the trend seems to be to oppose as much as possible the KYC and also be aware that "not your keys, not your coins", which all mean going away from custodial wallets.

There are very few niches available imho for a new custodian wallet. Maybe LN. It will not be easy for OP to start such a platform. He may even need backing from a financial institution and then he may become employee, which is far from the "getting rich" idea.

sunsilk

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 634

Quote from: NeuroticFish on August 16, 2022, 02:47:37 AM

Quote from: sunsilk on August 15, 2022, 05:28:55 PM

Most wallets earn from commission through additional from the fee that they're asking to their users. It's aside from the network or transaction fee, they're adding a bit from there.

I have a feeling you have no idea what you're talking about. Unless it's a custodian service (which is not really a proper wallet, since it's not your keys it's working with), a wallet doesn't charge extra fees. So all the fees are miner fees and the wallet developer earns nothing off it.
Custodian services do ask you to overpay for the fee and many make money off that, but, as I said, those are not really wallets (although I know that many tend to use even exchanges as wallet services).

Yeah, thanks.

I've forgot to say and add that it's mostly on the custodial wallets. I've used a handful of them in the past years and had a comparison to the current network fee and to those wallets that I've used before and there's really sort of an additional to the base fee.

Although the market wasn't really that bad at all during those times and those fees weren't that much. Eventually, I've stopped using them and sticked to the non-custodial ones.

libert19

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 952

If it gets popular then yes, projects will pay you in their token to get listed.

PowerGlove

hero member

Activity: 510

Merit: 4005

Quote from: hack3rcon on August 16, 2022, 11:45:09 PM

How about the transaction fee? Any wallet with the zero transaction fee?

Transaction fees are about incentivizing miners to include your transaction in the next block, therefore it wouldn't make much sense to have a wallet that supported "zero transaction fees".

Although it's not a consensus rule, there is a policy rule of 1 sat/vB minimum relay fee configured into most nodes. Miners can bypass this minimum (only consensus rules confine them, not policy rules) but if you broadcast a transaction to the network without fees then most nodes will just ignore it.

hack3rcon

member

Activity: 370

Merit: 10

Hello,
Thank you so much for all replies.

How about the transaction fee? Any wallet with the zero transaction fee?

alik111

member

Activity: 362

Merit: 12

Only by making a wallet willnot make anyone rich. You should have plans about how to make money. Like if you offer swapping feature in your wallet will make you rich. You can show ads also in your wallet. Trust wallet has many features for earning money.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: sunsilk on August 15, 2022, 05:28:55 PM

Most wallets earn from commission through additional from the fee that they're asking to their users. It's aside from the network or transaction fee, they're adding a bit from there.

I have a feeling you have no idea what you're talking about. Unless it's a custodian service (which is not really a proper wallet, since it's not your keys it's working with), a wallet doesn't charge extra fees. So all the fees are miner fees and the wallet developer earns nothing off it.
Custodian services do ask you to overpay for the fee and many make money off that, but, as I said, those are not really wallets (although I know that many tend to use even exchanges as wallet services).

sunsilk

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 634

Most wallets earn from commission through additional from the fee that they're asking to their users. It's aside from the network or transaction fee, they're adding a bit from there.

Also, if a wallet has an integrated exchange, they're earning more from there the same with what I've said about the fees and commissions.

Let's say that wallet owners or developers are earning but they're also making sure that their wallet is tight in security and they invest there as well.

kamvreto

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1157

MAaaN...!! CUT THAT STUPID SHIT

Quote from: Despairo on August 15, 2022, 10:05:03 AM

Quote from: kamvreto on August 15, 2022, 09:48:08 AM

Wallet makers will only sell hardware wallets that can be synchronized with the wallet application they made, so that they are wallet producers who benefit mainly from selling the hardware wallet. Free for mobile applications, but must purchase a hardware wallet to enjoy more complete features and better security.

For some wallets that implement KYC this is a bit crucial, because KYC will collect all user data and can be sold to third parties as a profit for the wallet maker.

I think it's make sense and that's the part of advertisement too, just like if you're want to take advantages of ledger live, you need to bought a ledger first. But honestly the features aren't that interesting than other wallets, mostly people are looking for the trustworthy and popularity of the company to make sure the hardware wallet they bought are very secure.

Which wallets do implement KYC? Freewallet isn't even a wallet, but an exchange and yeah it's a scam exchange that would collect your KYC. There's no way and no reason we need to use a wallet that collect our KYC

Of course, trust and popularity are number one, but we must also pay attention to the development of the wallet and the update of the security level that is up to date.

For wallets that implement KYC, try checking the EIDOO wallet, the wallet uses KYC to create an Eidoo ID and will be able to access hybrid Dex Exchange in it and participate in several ICO projects. it's a mobile wallet app and it also uses the Card to access the "eidoocard" wallet.
For more details, you can check on their website official https://eidoo.io/

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 3096

Top Crypto Casino

As long as there are free and better alternatives, it's unlikely that you will get any profit from creating your own wallet app. Just take a look at Electrum, it's probably one of the most trusted and used bitcoin wallets and it's completely free. They don't even accept donations.

The wallet you are going to create has to have some new features you don't see on other wallets to attract users first. Then you can follow any of the suggestions above to monetize it (displaying ads, paid features, having its own token...)

OcTradism

hero member

Activity: 1722

Merit: 801

Previously, Trust wallet did not launch their own token.

You can get income from users if you have a good crypto wallets. Launching a token is another source of income for your wallet company. You can create wallet, build products first and when it succeeds, you can launch your token. Another way is using crowd funding and launch a token at the same time of first version of your wallet.

Getting rich will depend on success of your wallet. Don't think it is similar to build a phishing wallet, steal seeds or users and their funds. You won't get rich this way. Rich in money but poor in morality.

StormHawk

member

Activity: 220

Merit: 12

Possibly, if you have something fresh and good to offer crypto users, this might sound easy but trust me it's not, also if you want to embark on this journey make sure your wallet is open source and do not rush token launch, make sure there are many people using the wallet first.

Despairo

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 843

Quote from: kamvreto on August 15, 2022, 09:48:08 AM

Wallet makers will only sell hardware wallets that can be synchronized with the wallet application they made, so that they are wallet producers who benefit mainly from selling the hardware wallet. Free for mobile applications, but must purchase a hardware wallet to enjoy more complete features and better security.

For some wallets that implement KYC this is a bit crucial, because KYC will collect all user data and can be sold to third parties as a profit for the wallet maker.

I think it's make sense and that's the part of advertisement too, just like if you're want to take advantages of ledger live, you need to bought a ledger first. But honestly the features aren't that interesting than other wallets, mostly people are looking for the trustworthy and popularity of the company to make sure the hardware wallet they bought are very secure.

Which wallets do implement KYC? Freewallet isn't even a wallet, but an exchange and yeah it's a scam exchange that would collect your KYC. There's no way and no reason we need to use a wallet that collect our KYC

kamvreto

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1157

MAaaN...!! CUT THAT STUPID SHIT

Quote from: NeuroticFish on August 15, 2022, 09:19:31 AM

Quote from: m2017 on August 15, 2022, 07:43:17 AM

What if go the other way? Offer a crypto wallet to the community for a one-time payment or a subscription model. In this case, the creator will not need to collect user data for subsequent sale, and users will be spared from "spying" on their data. I think it's a win-win situation. Personally, I have not heard of such wallets for which you would have to pay, as for the purchase of any software. In this case, developers will need to have an impeccable reputation so that users can fully trust them, especially for their money.

Since there are already free wallets in use, I don't think that there will be users willing to pay for such a subscription.
So unless the wallet has some very good and useful features nobody else has implemented (situation that probably cannot last long), why would someone pay for a product he can get for free?

even though it has good features, people still think about subscribing, because many wallet applications are provided free of charge with many features so that for a wallet application that is subscribed it will be difficult to get users.
Wallet makers will only sell hardware wallets that can be synchronized with the wallet application they made, so that they are wallet producers who benefit mainly from selling the hardware wallet. Free for mobile applications, but must purchase a hardware wallet to enjoy more complete features and better security.

For some wallets that implement KYC this is a bit crucial, because KYC will collect all user data and can be sold to third parties as a profit for the wallet maker.

First Registration

member

Activity: 223

Merit: 24

Honesty will go a long way!!

Quote from: NeuroticFish on August 15, 2022, 09:19:31 AM

Quote from: m2017 on August 15, 2022, 07:43:17 AM

What if go the other way? Offer a crypto wallet to the community for a one-time payment or a subscription model. In this case, the creator will not need to collect user data for subsequent sale, and users will be spared from "spying" on their data. I think it's a win-win situation. Personally, I have not heard of such wallets for which you would have to pay, as for the purchase of any software. In this case, developers will need to have an impeccable reputation so that users can fully trust them, especially for their money.

Since there are already free wallets in use, I don't think that there will be users willing to pay for such a subscription.
So unless the wallet has some very good and useful features nobody else has implemented (situation that probably cannot last long), why would someone pay for a product he can get for free?

You are absolutely right. If we can use wallet for free then why use wallet with money. We already use many free wallets such as: trust wallet, metamask etc. I don't need any more wallets in my opinion

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: m2017 on August 15, 2022, 07:43:17 AM

What if go the other way? Offer a crypto wallet to the community for a one-time payment or a subscription model. In this case, the creator will not need to collect user data for subsequent sale, and users will be spared from "spying" on their data. I think it's a win-win situation. Personally, I have not heard of such wallets for which you would have to pay, as for the purchase of any software. In this case, developers will need to have an impeccable reputation so that users can fully trust them, especially for their money.

Since there are already free wallets in use, I don't think that there will be users willing to pay for such a subscription.
So unless the wallet has some very good and useful features nobody else has implemented (situation that probably cannot last long), why would someone pay for a product he can get for free?

Topic: Can making a wallet make you rich? (Read 253 times)