But bitcoin is a currency and ripple is mainly an exchange system. This is like when reporters call mt gox hacks, bitcoin hacks.
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main
benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending.
We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.
The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing
the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of
events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As
long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to
attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The
network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort
basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest
proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
Lets talk about OpenCoin's ethics. It's a deliberate ploy on a naive public to use a name like OpenCoin and try to talk about it in the same sentence as Bitcoin. Using underhand tactics such as paid infiltrators from OpenCoin to forums, conferences and other social media, makes me thing they might also be behind some of the recent DDoS attacks on Bitcoin nodes and exchanges, plus some of the bot driven price manipulations to keep down the price of BTC.
I don't remember Opencoin saying they are making a currency or competing directly with bitcoin? Do you have a link to that proof?
Do you have proof of this? But a company that accepts Google Venture money means that they are not doing anything unethic, you never know but it seems highly unlikely.