Remove the ad signature and make 1000 posts a day if you want.
says the one with a huge ritz grand casino signature and constant one liners
I did not post for money, it was not stupid and it was not pointless
I answered the question on how to implement images in threads using BB code
my only fault is that it has been answered in a different manner previously
Actually I'm pretty sure LaudaM only just put that signature up.
Yes I do admit over 50% of my last posts (11 out of 20) are just a single sentence. I did however add the signature to earn some extra while posting. My posting days were back in late '13. I'm posting 2-3 times (estimate) less on average per month.
and so am I..
Sorry but the vast majority of my posts are quality and not one-liners. Refer to my BTCVegas thread. I'd say it has about 50 lines of text on the OP alone.
That is not "spam". When I make one-liners they are almost always at least 10 words, rather than 5 or 6. Posts that are quickly made to gain a buck are what we dislike.
Your argument is air. BadBear does not have a paid signature either. In fact the only one your argument holds a bit up against is LaudaM, but you can not use an argument against another person to excuse your actions or try and call us out.
doesn't matter what you dislike
matters what is spam
this is not
I was trying to point out the hypocrisy how my posts are allegedly spam but when the same happens on your side they aren't just because you don't have an ad
that is a prime example of hypocrisy
You are not listening to any argument anyone makes, clearly, as you have ignored the fact your posts are spam because they are being done for money. Our point is EXACTLY that you had an ad, proving that your posts weren't constructive on purpose. If someone does not have an ad, then their posts may not intentionally be nonconstructive.
no
you are not listening to me
you can't just make up a definition, writing for money isn't spamming
then journalists are spamming when writing something for the newspaper
then people writing on hubpages are spamming
people using google adsense are spamming
so everyone who writes for money is intentionally being nonconstructive?
why don't you ban everyone using a signature ad?
Many staff and members support banning signature ads, however we can't just decide to change it without theymos deciding to. Don't come complaining to me, especially when you're brushing away my arguments like an immature child. What does google adsense and hubpages have to do with signature ads? You choose to look at their content and see their ads. When you spam good threads, people are basically forced to look at your spammy posts and ads until they ignore you.
you're either acting dumb or..
all of your arguements are based on a theory that posting to earn money is spam
which is not true
the definition of spam I have posted a number of times does not include that, you can't change facts based on your opinion
you're the one acting like a child and does not want to embrace facts and definitions
and still you act dumb..
you said that posting to earn money = spam
people post to earn money on hubpages etc. that's why I wrote it and that's why it's related
people don't choose to see ads on other websites, they just do
they come for the content but they see the ads too
as I have stated and I will state it as many times as I need
posting to earn money isn't spamming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_spamForum spam consists of posts on Internet forums that contains related or unrelated advertisements, links to malicious websites, and abusive or otherwise unwanted information. Forum spam is usually posted onto message boards by automated spambots or manually with unscrupulous intentions with one idea in mind: to get the spam in front of readers who would not otherwise have anything to do with it intentionally.
should signature advertisments be banned is a complete other subject..
