I agree with you, but thats the way it is around here. As long as "low post quality" is okay for the campaign he signed in, then he's clear. He's not breaking bylaws and he's absolutely not the only one. Like i just said, more than half the posts in Bitcoin Discussion is like that. Pages and pages of nonsense, so i don't blame legit people doing discussion from skipping the pages by the dozens.
The topics are much more rich in hardware, market and support threads.
Not really, a lot of people get banned for low quality posting, even if they are not spamming but i agree that some of the campaign managers are a little bit too, well they are not doing their job correctly.
Ban from what? The campaign? Because according to the forum rules, low quality posting isint spam/flooding.
If the campaign manager are supposed to be kicking users with bad quality posts from their campaign, then i would gladly like they start tightening the screw. There's some pretty interesting topic i'd like to actually discuss but my posts are stuck between a flood of different meaningless posts.
Havent you seen people getting banned for low quality posts + sig ad, i have seen plenty of them in the meta postig about their bans because they used to post low quality posts
No but i guess it make sense, if the mod/admin at the time feel a bit vindictive, they can probably temp ban the user because if there's something no one like receiving, its spam. Maybe its not that they don't punish users for poor generic posting but that there's so many, they can't get them all.
You'd need to employ some police group just for that and i guess that is more trouble than its worth, since it would probably *10 the amount of people asking about their ban. I guess there's no getting away from the spam either way.