Most dictatorships eventually fall due to a reaction of the people. A 'scientific dictatorship' (aka 'technocracy') seeks to cut off some of the avenues for failure which have vexed past dictatorships. This through extremely fine-grained monitoring and control of every aspect of every individual's life.
Those funding the 'technocracy' which is half-way in place already are largely the very people who mastered the previous dictatorship which was based on control of debt-based money. They plan to continue to sit right where they are at on top of the pyramid, but be able to sleep better at night knowing that a toppling is even less possible than before.
BTW, could these debt-based monetary system leaders have created peace and comfort to the impoverished masses? I say 'yes', they probably could have. Did they? I say 'no'. For the most part they created war, misery, and hopelessness in order to increase their own wealth and power. I see no reason why they would change their tune if/when they sat atop a technocracy. The 'illuminated' mind does not tend to see value in such things. The 'scientists and engineers' who work on these technocracy systems will NOT be the ones making the decisions as is commonly marketed. In fact they will be a weak link in the system due to their knowledge and capabilities and will probably be in some danger.