Can we start talking about splitting amicably... - page 2.

Killerpotleaf

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 250

A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

Quote from: DannyHamilton on March 25, 2017, 11:35:28 PM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 25, 2017, 11:29:25 PM

let not pretend Todd and Gmax haven't said things too...

can we split amicably? how do we do that? is such a thing even possible?

thats the question.

Just convince Core to implement SegWit as a hard fork. Then all the SegWit supporters can amicably run their own fork.

segwit is "Effectively" a HF.
maybe the 30% of miners backing segwit right now, can mine a block with a segwit TX in it, and prove my point...

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 4945

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 25, 2017, 11:29:25 PM

let not pretend Todd and Gmax haven't said things too...

can we split amicably? how do we do that? is such a thing even possible?

thats the question.

Just convince Core to implement SegWit as a hard fork. Then all the SegWit supporters can amicably run their own fork.

Killerpotleaf

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 250

A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

let not pretend Todd and Gmax haven't said things too...

can we split amicably? how do we do that? is such a thing even possible?

thats the question.

Holliday

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1012

Quote from: franky1 on March 25, 2017, 10:35:24 PM

core: day three "please amicably split but you have to runoff"

OP supports BU.

Quote from: franky1 on March 25, 2017, 10:35:24 PM

meanwhile for the last two years+ all different diverse nodes that want to keep the decentralised PEER network alive have made no threats and added no nuclear detonation split button.

Indeed, here are some of the non-threats from BU.

Quote from: btc.top

We have prepared $100 million USD to kill the small fork of CoreCoin, no matter what POW algorithm, sha256 or scrypt or X11 or any other GPU algorithm. Show me your money. We very much welcome a CoreCoin change to POS.

Quote from: Gavin Andresen

Preventing a minority-hashrate fork from confirming any transactions is a good idea. Nakomoto Consensus != unanimity.

Quote from: Peter Rizun

Miners will orphan the blocks of non-compliant miners prior to the first larger block to serve as a reminder to upgrade.

Quote from: Peter Rizun

To address the risk of coins being spent on this chain (replay risk), majority miners will deploy hash power as needed to ensure the minority chain includes only empty blocks after the forking point.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-market-needs-big-blocks-says-founder-btc-top-mining-pool/
https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/827904756525981697
https://medium.com/@peter_r/on-the-emerging-consensus-regarding-bitcoins-block-size-limit-insights-from-my-visit-with-2348878a16d8#.hih385eti

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4424

Merit: 4794

core: day one "fear splits they are bad they will destroy bitcoin
core: day two "you shold split off"
core: day three "please amicably split but you have to runoff"

meanwhile for the last two years+ all different diverse nodes that want to keep the decentralised PEER network alive have made no threats and added no nuclear detonation split button.

if core want to split they need to press their button because they are the only ones with them.

Quantus

legendary

Activity: 883

Merit: 1005

There can be only one.

cpfreeplz

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1042

I see. So you want a divorce. Fine. I'll get the kids on weekends and holidays, you get them during the school week. Is that what you want!?

Nah but seriously I think dividing isn't necessarily the best option if someone can just agree for once ffs. It's all a passing contest, no one cares what is best for everyone.

Killerpotleaf

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 250

A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

can we just agree this isnt working out?
no "51% attack" no "UASF PoW change"
we simply split this thing right down the middle

amicably!

is that possible?

how do YOU USERS feel about that?

Topic: Can we start talking about splitting amicably... - page 2. (Read 1420 times)