Can we trust Blockchain.com? (Poll) | Bitcointalksearch.org

Oilacris

hero member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 609

Quote from: shield132 on March 04, 2019, 12:06:27 PM

Quote from: jakezyrus on March 01, 2019, 08:49:53 PM

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 31, 2019, 04:33:19 PM

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

I agree with you, even if the giveaway is high, is just a terrible idea to give our information to those businesses. I don't think they would sell it, but no one know when they could get hacked.

i dont think that their give away is high because a giveaway usually means little to less . but its okay and you must not worry alot to give your information because its obvious that blockchain.com is 100 percent legit and trusted for a long time up until today . not unless you will get a phishing email or invitation , that simply means it is your own fault and not blockchain if ever something bad happend to your account and info .

Their giveaway is high to be fair because they 100% pay you 25$ in just uploading KYC documents. If anyone plans to use blockchain.info for long term, maybe it worths tu upload now and get those 25$ because probably they'll require KYC in anyway to use their service, why not to benefit now especially when you have 100% legal transactions and have nothing to worry about.
Also it has nothing to do with email spoofing because that message appears on blockchain.info's website and mobile app.

Using blockchain.com service doesn't imply strict KYC compliance unless if you do tend to buy or use up their service then you would really need to comply but
using it solely as a wallet then it doesn't really need at all and also $25 in exchange with your identity isn't really a good deal.It wont really be fair on the first place.

shield132

hero member

Activity: 2352

Merit: 905

Metawin.com - Truly the best casino ever

Quote from: jakezyrus on March 01, 2019, 08:49:53 PM

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 31, 2019, 04:33:19 PM

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

I agree with you, even if the giveaway is high, is just a terrible idea to give our information to those businesses. I don't think they would sell it, but no one know when they could get hacked.

i dont think that their give away is high because a giveaway usually means little to less . but its okay and you must not worry alot to give your information because its obvious that blockchain.com is 100 percent legit and trusted for a long time up until today . not unless you will get a phishing email or invitation , that simply means it is your own fault and not blockchain if ever something bad happend to your account and info .

Their giveaway is high to be fair because they 100% pay you 25$ in just uploading KYC documents. If anyone plans to use blockchain.info for long term, maybe it worths tu upload now and get those 25$ because probably they'll require KYC in anyway to use their service, why not to benefit now especially when you have 100% legal transactions and have nothing to worry about.
Also it has nothing to do with email spoofing because that message appears on blockchain.info's website and mobile app.

vv181

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1273

Quote from: seoincorporation on March 02, 2019, 12:29:21 PM

Maybe we can trust in blockchain but remember we can trust in hackers, sometimes isn't about the site, is about the vulns. Remember there are zero days exploits who can vuln all the internet and isn't about the site security. Is like this forum, we can trust admin 100% but the site already got hacked once. So, think two times before exposing your information.

Any Centralized entities can't be trusted.

Bitcoin nature is trustless, why would you choose something that defects from Bitcoin nature's.

After all, I don't get the point why would people exchange their full identity for $25, and some even for participating worthless altcoin bounties.

seoincorporation

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 3130

Quote from: jakezyrus on March 01, 2019, 08:49:53 PM

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 31, 2019, 04:33:19 PM

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

I agree with you, even if the giveaway is high, is just a terrible idea to give our information to those businesses. I don't think they would sell it, but no one know when they could get hacked.

i dont think that their give away is high because a giveaway usually means little to less . but its okay and you must not worry alot to give your information because its obvious that blockchain.com is 100 percent legit and trusted for a long time up until today . not unless you will get a phishing email or invitation , that simply means it is your own fault and not blockchain if ever something bad happend to your account and info .

Maybe we can trust in blockchain but remember we can trust in hackers, sometimes isn't about the site, is about the vulns. Remember there are zero days exploits who can vuln all the internet and isn't about the site security. Is like this forum, we can trust admin 100% but the site already got hacked once. So, think two times before exposing your information.

jakezyrus

full member

Activity: 714

Merit: 100

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 31, 2019, 04:33:19 PM

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

I agree with you, even if the giveaway is high, is just a terrible idea to give our information to those businesses. I don't think they would sell it, but no one know when they could get hacked.

i dont think that their give away is high because a giveaway usually means little to less . but its okay and you must not worry alot to give your information because its obvious that blockchain.com is 100 percent legit and trusted for a long time up until today . not unless you will get a phishing email or invitation , that simply means it is your own fault and not blockchain if ever something bad happend to your account and info .

leowonderful

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1130

Bitcoin FTW!

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

as far as i can remember Stellar has always required your identification in their giveaways. and this is not their first giveaway. so i don't think it was a "blockchain.com" thing but more of a stellar thing that they asked for identification. in any case i have never bothered with anything like that even if the value of the giveaway were high.
not to mention that these days with all these companies selling or at best leaking your identification on dark market, it is not such a good idea to give it to them!

I do recall there was an airdrop of XLM if you were able to sign a message from a wallet you owned a while back (perhaps a year ago?) if you consider airdrops giveaways, but it does indeed seem like Stellar's requiring Id as of their most recent giveaways.

Did some searching and the airdrop was around March 2017, so nearly two years ago with some details here (click for link) if you're interested in looking back at that. Seems like the airdrop was also for XRP holders back then, though I personally only participated in the BTC side of the airdrop.

seoincorporation

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 3130

Quote from: pooya87 on January 31, 2019, 01:40:17 AM

as far as i can remember Stellar has always required your identification in their giveaways. and this is not their first giveaway. so i don't think it was a "blockchain.com" thing but more of a stellar thing that they asked for identification. in any case i have never bothered with anything like that even if the value of the giveaway were high.
not to mention that these days with all these companies selling or at best leaking your identification on dark market, it is not such a good idea to give it to them!

I agree with you, even if the giveaway is high, is just a terrible idea to give our information to those businesses. I don't think they would sell it, but no one know when they could get hacked.

pooya87

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 10611

as far as i can remember Stellar has always required your identification in their giveaways. and this is not their first giveaway. so i don't think it was a "blockchain.com" thing but more of a stellar thing that they asked for identification. in any case i have never bothered with anything like that even if the value of the giveaway were high.
not to mention that these days with all these companies selling or at best leaking your identification on dark market, it is not such a good idea to give it to them!

omer-jamal

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 275

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on January 10, 2019, 02:42:45 PM

~ people would simply abuse the giveaway through multiple accounts (and attempt to claim more & more Stellar) ~

They can use services to do kyc without knowing user data For example ( civic , thekey , selfkey ... else ) to fix this problem..
But this will make it difficult to get users data privacy ! from this services

100 XLM about 10$ in this days

Potato Chips

hero member

Activity: 2786

Merit: 902

yesssir! 🫡

Quote from: sunsilk

maybe stellar just sponsored that 'giveaway/airdrop' or they are just making a story with it.

There's a fair chance stellar actually did. If you think about it, there's a mutual benefit here since blockchain.com one of the most used wallet started integrating their coin which would help the adoption

Quote from: sunsilk

What I've found out, they also have a 'Swap' now. You need to verify few of your info to be approved as tier 1 which includes a $1,000 limit and if you want to upgrade you need to pass on additional requirements including the ID and it gives 'eligibility' for the airdrop.

Inb4 mandatory kyc Cheesy

Gotta agree to 1referee tho. The kyc will basically earn by themselves and sooner or later they will get back the monies they've sent to their users but the good news is, they will get more!

1Referee

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1427

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 14, 2019, 01:42:39 PM

They are asking for users verification paying $25, so, they shouldn't call it a giveaway. If they want to give money to their users, then ok, make a giveaway, but if they want to pay for their users' verification, then don't call it a giveaway because that's only a bait and not a true giveaway.

It's how marketing works, everywhere. Free money doesn't exist, people should understand that by now.

The main point is that most people using blockchain or any other service, are not using it to ever spend money. What's the best way to increase the odds of having them become a potential paid customer? Right, offer them a giveaway in form of whatever crypto currency, and in return for that people 'only' have to verify themselves.

By verifying yourself you basically take away a massive obstacle that stands between you and the exchange. Now you can participate in future giveaways, and more importantly, buy coins instantly and use other services that involve fees, which is what they want you to do the most because that allows them to make money. Business are here to make money, blockchain too.

sunsilk

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 634

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 14, 2019, 01:42:39 PM

So, getting on this point and after reading your replays, we all agree on something. They are asking for users verification paying $25, so, they shouldn't call it a giveaway. If they want to give money to their users, then ok, make a giveaway, but if they want to pay for their users' verification, then don't call it a giveaway because that's only a bait and not a true giveaway.

Yeah that's a bait that they are trying to implement KYC a little by little. They aren't surprising their users of totally implementing the KYC alone, maybe stellar just sponsored that 'giveaway/airdrop' or they are just making a story with it.

What I've found out, they also have a 'Swap' now. You need to verify few of your info to be approved as tier 1 which includes a $1,000 limit and if you want to upgrade you need to pass on additional requirements including the ID and it gives 'eligibility' for the airdrop.

seoincorporation

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 3130

So, getting on this point and after reading your replays, we all agree on something. They are asking for users verification paying $25, so, they shouldn't call it a giveaway. If they want to give money to their users, then ok, make a giveaway, but if they want to pay for their users' verification, then don't call it a giveaway because that's only a bait and not a true giveaway.

jhongzjhong

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 109

https://bmy.guide

I also have an account on blockchain.com but I didn't pass verification for only 25$ on altcoin that called stellar that they have given away if you've passed ID verification which is very risky on us. Well, I understand them, in that way having verification just to avoid possible abuse on the activity having a giveaway but I think 25$ is not worth it to reveal your identity.
I used this wallet to receive fund into my main wallet, but I don't use it for storing my crypto asset.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: figmentofmyass on January 12, 2019, 12:37:25 PM

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 10, 2019, 01:05:12 PM

Here is the issue.

Some months ago blockchain.com makes a giveaway. $125,000,000 dollars in stellar. The idea was $25 for each user. But when you try to claim the money they ask you to verify your identity. So, in the end, it wasn't a giveaway at all, they pay their users to verify their identity. And I think it was a nasty move.

By the way, I don't think they will really giveaway $125M and I don't think they have 5 Million users.

We can just avoid the verification and still using their service, but why they want identity verification from their users? only they know the answer. I keep using their service but I begin to doubt if we can trust them. What do you think?

there's two ways to approach this.

1. they are compromised by government agencies. they want a quick and easy way to link identity to wallet transaction history. this is by far the most lucrative way to exploit their market share.

2. they're trying to expand their exchange service, which requires KYC. the $125M is just a gimmick; they won't have nearly that many takers at $25 a pop.

This is what im thinking. They do make that $125M as a gimmick just to pull in people to make identity verifications which theres really a possibility that these infos
would be linked to any wallet transaction history. Sounds too paranoid? but this one is really possible.

For the amount of $25 i dont know if someone would really agree on these terms.

figmentofmyass

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1483

Quote from: seoincorporation on January 10, 2019, 01:05:12 PM

Here is the issue.

Some months ago blockchain.com makes a giveaway. $125,000,000 dollars in stellar. The idea was $25 for each user. But when you try to claim the money they ask you to verify your identity. So, in the end, it wasn't a giveaway at all, they pay their users to verify their identity. And I think it was a nasty move.

By the way, I don't think they will really giveaway $125M and I don't think they have 5 Million users.

We can just avoid the verification and still using their service, but why they want identity verification from their users? only they know the answer. I keep using their service but I begin to doubt if we can trust them. What do you think?

there's two ways to approach this.

1. they are compromised by government agencies. they want a quick and easy way to link identity to wallet transaction history. this is by far the most lucrative way to exploit their market share.

2. they're trying to expand their exchange service, which requires KYC. the $125M is just a gimmick; they won't have nearly that many takers at $25 a pop.

bL4nkcode

copper member

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1305

Limited in number. Limitless in potential.

I have an account in blockchain.com wallet but never use them in sending any amount by any means, I just use the wallet for notification purposes when I receive an amount from the watched only address I imported.

And regarding for trusting my personal information for some $25 of altcoin on such company that manipulated by ver, no way..

sunsilk

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 634

I saw a particular person posted that he already claimed the promised $25 airdrop from them. I have the same sentiment like what others said. I use them and I enjoy that but when its comes to sending my IDs, thats another thing which I disagree.

Theres a dual purpose for their KYC now, as the stellar airdrop ends if you want to use their integrated exchange they also require ID verification. Whats good with them even we wont pass KYC, we are still able to use them as wallet.

I trust them somehow with their service but I dont trust them to keep my data.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3262

Merit: 1376

Slava Ukraini!

I use Blockchain.com wallet, but I have tiny amount of BTC on this wallet. I can say that I trust them, but only up to certain level. I wouldn't hold large number of BTC on web wallet, especially when I have hardware wallet.
I haven't claimed Stellar airdrop from Blockchain.com wallet. It's not because I don't trust them, KYC is probably is the most effective way to prevent abuse in similar giveways, but I just don't want to sell my identity for just $25. And from my personal perspective I don't see reasons to do KYC which I use as crypto wallet and nothing more.
Probably majority of you in this thread have done KYC on various exchanges and don't see nothing wrong in it. In my opinion KYC on Blockchain.com wallet isn't something worse. It's better than give your sensitive personal information to random ICO's with easy hand.
P.S I wouldn't be surprised if one day they will require KYC for all their users. It's just my prediction, but I see that they are moving to it step by step.

hugeblack

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 4002

I am looking at this differently because of the intense movement around knowing who is buying cryptos and who has money/coins in his account.
A lot of trading platforms & services are starting to turn to the central, this wallet "Blockchain.com" cannot be far from them.

35,000 BTC would not be a large sum for a wallet that had been in operation form the first few days, "in addition to its new contract with hardware wallets" although I doubt their ability to pay the money.

Can we trust Blockchain.com? No

Topic: Can we trust Blockchain.com? (Poll) (Read 508 times)