Topic: Car on the water: Stanley Meyer (Read 322 times)
It's nice to meet a knowledgeable person. Molecules are polar and nonpolar. Non-polar ones do not have electric poles. Polar molecules have electric polarity (+) and (-). So a polar molecule can be stretched by an electric field. The water molecule is polar and in the Meyer generator was stretched by an electric field. The strength of the electric field is greater than the strength of the covalent bond. This physical principle is embedded in the Meyer generator.
Regular water = H-O-H.
Meyer's water = H-H-O.
The atoms in Meyer's water (Brown's gas) are not entirely stable. One H can be easily removed in a chemical reaction (burned with oxygen).
The remaining O-H is unstable in its form, and combines with a second O-H to form peroxide, H2O2. Peroxide is unstable in this form, and gives up an H to form water + H. The H burns with outside oxygen that is drawn into the engine.
There is actually a chain of reactions that occur in the process. The result is that energy is released , strong enough to make substantial power.
The trick is converting regular water (H-O-H) into Brown's gas (H-H-O) in a simple, fast way. That's what Meyer did.
Meyer's water = H-H-O.
The atoms in Meyer's water (Brown's gas) are not entirely stable. One H can be easily removed in a chemical reaction (burned with oxygen).
The remaining O-H is unstable in its form, and combines with a second O-H to form peroxide, H2O2. Peroxide is unstable in this form, and gives up an H to form water + H. The H burns with outside oxygen that is drawn into the engine.
There is actually a chain of reactions that occur in the process. The result is that energy is released , strong enough to make substantial power.
The trick is converting regular water (H-O-H) into Brown's gas (H-H-O) in a simple, fast way. That's what Meyer did.
This gave me an idea to try in the future, thanks.
Those who haven't tried the Bitcoin Blockchain fuel saver are missing out on huge savings. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/has-anyone-else-tried-this-nakamoto-diesel-fuel-saver-5403404
It's an easy build.
Those who haven't tried the Bitcoin Blockchain fuel saver are missing out on huge savings. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/has-anyone-else-tried-this-nakamoto-diesel-fuel-saver-5403404
It's an easy build.
Now the 5th technological order is coming to an end.
What are the 5 technoclades and what technologies they are based on, you can Google.
There is a new technological path ahead, its basis will be a closed nuclear cycle.
Stanley Meyer's technology belongs to the 7th technological order.
Extracting electricity from uranium or thorium is the same as burning hydrocarbons.
It is easier to extract electricity from the decomposition of a water molecule than from uranium and thorium, but no one will let you do it.
What are the 5 technoclades and what technologies they are based on, you can Google.
There is a new technological path ahead, its basis will be a closed nuclear cycle.
Stanley Meyer's technology belongs to the 7th technological order.
Extracting electricity from uranium or thorium is the same as burning hydrocarbons.
It is easier to extract electricity from the decomposition of a water molecule than from uranium and thorium, but no one will let you do it.
The Meyer generator produces Brown gas (hydrogen fuel) + generates electricity.
Something similar to what Tesla did
The creator of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamota and Vitalik Buterin, the creator of Ethereum, have made their work open to the world.
I also made my work open. Stanley Meyer did not make his work public, as a result, he was declared a fraudster.
If you have the knowledge, you can check out my developments.
The rest is all words.
In the field of cryptocurrencies, you will not be able to do anything significant, all the places are already occupied. And there is a lot of free space in the field of hydrogen energy.
I'm trying to convey the idea that the world of cryptocurrencies depends on electricity and on the owners of energy companies.
There is electricity - there are your cryptocurrency assets, there is no electricity, you do not have cryptocurrencies.
Any businessman strives to "store eggs in different baskets." No one is immune from the collusion of energy companies seeking to put the owners of crypto farms and owners of crypto wallets under their control.
The ecosystem of crypto miners and cryptocurrency owners should reduce their risks and dependence on energy companies.
To do this, they must finance projects in the field of hydrogen energy themselves.
What Stanley Meyer didn't say
https://youtu.be/55GWbeJyHh0
I also made my work open. Stanley Meyer did not make his work public, as a result, he was declared a fraudster.
If you have the knowledge, you can check out my developments.
The rest is all words.
In the field of cryptocurrencies, you will not be able to do anything significant, all the places are already occupied. And there is a lot of free space in the field of hydrogen energy.
Quote
Do you want to spend the rest of your life selling sugared water or do you want a chance to change the world? A comment he made in persuading John Sculley to become Apple's CEO, as quoted in Odyssey: Pepsi to Apple: A Journey of Adventure, Ideas, and the Future (1987) by John Sculley and John A. Byrne 1980s
I'm trying to convey the idea that the world of cryptocurrencies depends on electricity and on the owners of energy companies.
There is electricity - there are your cryptocurrency assets, there is no electricity, you do not have cryptocurrencies.
Any businessman strives to "store eggs in different baskets." No one is immune from the collusion of energy companies seeking to put the owners of crypto farms and owners of crypto wallets under their control.
The ecosystem of crypto miners and cryptocurrency owners should reduce their risks and dependence on energy companies.
To do this, they must finance projects in the field of hydrogen energy themselves.
What Stanley Meyer didn't say
https://youtu.be/55GWbeJyHh0
...
You refer to competitors who, unlike me, hide their technologies. There are no physical and mathematical models, technical solutions. Only the benefits are presented, without scientific justification. I don't hide my works, they are open.
There are only a handful of ways anybody invents anything that is practical. Either it happened by accident, or somebody else showed it to him, or he worked to invent or discover it. This doesn't mean that he has to relate all the details in every publication that somebody writes about it.
In this case, I haven't scoured the Internet to find if the info is detailed anywhere. And I haven't contacted the people to see if they would give it to me. And I certainly haven't gone through the work of trying to duplicate the effort on my own. Have you done any of this?
Perhaps it's all a scam. Maybe they didn't do it at all. It might only be unsubstantiated talk, like hearsay. But we have a starting point that we can use to further our investigations... if we even think that the idea is worthwhile.
But the points that a clean burning, gasoline engine only produces water and CO2 (and some tiny amounts of a few other materials) can be substantiated in all kinds of engineering manuals. And along with it the fact that CO2 is plant food... helps plants grow better.
Hydrogen energy: Water instead of oil
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
Someday I suspect the energy problems on this planet will be solved. When it does and the technology to extract hydrogen from water and store in hydride is readily available and cheap, I think it wouldn't be a bad option for the planet. I'm not sure how long we'll be able to keep making batteries with rare earth...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ytg23mDd1a4
^ Watch that video. It's educational. People have been able to run cars on hydrogen extracted from water for decades now. The planet would certainly prefer this method.
Here's a product that not only gives hydrogen, but at the half-way point, you get water.
I guess most people don't know that if your gasoline burned clean and complete in your car engine, you would get water and CO2 out of the tail pipe. The water is in the form of steam in the engine, but condenses on its way out. And the CO2 is good because it is plant food.
New Solar-Powered Invention Creates Hydrogen Fuel from the Air
Quote from: https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/new-solar-powered-invention-creates-hydrogen-fuel-from-the-air/
This sponge uses electrolysis to extract pure hydrogen, and can be powered by solar or wind energy, producing renewable fuel from renewable electricity.
The only portable green fuel source that could replace diesel or kerosene at scale, pure hydrogen is not abundant in nature, and finding ways to produce it sustainably is the key to expanding its use in industry and transportation.
Vehicles can be equipped with hydrogen fuel cells, which combust the pure hydrogen with oxygen to create an effect similar to when fossil fuels are combusted, except the only emission is hydrogen plus oxygen—water.
...
The only portable green fuel source that could replace diesel or kerosene at scale, pure hydrogen is not abundant in nature, and finding ways to produce it sustainably is the key to expanding its use in industry and transportation.
Vehicles can be equipped with hydrogen fuel cells, which combust the pure hydrogen with oxygen to create an effect similar to when fossil fuels are combusted, except the only emission is hydrogen plus oxygen—water.
...
You refer to competitors who, unlike me, hide their technologies. There are no physical and mathematical models, technical solutions. Only the benefits are presented, without scientific justification. I don't hide my works, they are open.
Hydrogen energy: Water instead of oil
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
Someday I suspect the energy problems on this planet will be solved. When it does and the technology to extract hydrogen from water and store in hydride is readily available and cheap, I think it wouldn't be a bad option for the planet. I'm not sure how long we'll be able to keep making batteries with rare earth...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ytg23mDd1a4
^ Watch that video. It's educational. People have been able to run cars on hydrogen extracted from water for decades now. The planet would certainly prefer this method.
Here's a product that not only gives hydrogen, but at the half-way point, you get water.
I guess most people don't know that if your gasoline burned clean and complete in your car engine, you would get water and CO2 out of the tail pipe. The water is in the form of steam in the engine, but condenses on its way out. And the CO2 is good because it is plant food.
New Solar-Powered Invention Creates Hydrogen Fuel from the Air
Quote from: https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/new-solar-powered-invention-creates-hydrogen-fuel-from-the-air/
This sponge uses electrolysis to extract pure hydrogen, and can be powered by solar or wind energy, producing renewable fuel from renewable electricity.
The only portable green fuel source that could replace diesel or kerosene at scale, pure hydrogen is not abundant in nature, and finding ways to produce it sustainably is the key to expanding its use in industry and transportation.
Vehicles can be equipped with hydrogen fuel cells, which combust the pure hydrogen with oxygen to create an effect similar to when fossil fuels are combusted, except the only emission is hydrogen plus oxygen—water.
...
The only portable green fuel source that could replace diesel or kerosene at scale, pure hydrogen is not abundant in nature, and finding ways to produce it sustainably is the key to expanding its use in industry and transportation.
Vehicles can be equipped with hydrogen fuel cells, which combust the pure hydrogen with oxygen to create an effect similar to when fossil fuels are combusted, except the only emission is hydrogen plus oxygen—water.
...
Progress does not stand still. Human civilization has gone through 5 technological paradigm.
The basis of these structures was and is energy.
Now we are at the end of the 5th and at the beginning of the 6th technological paradigm.
1 technological paradigm - energy of movement of water, wind (mills)
2 technological paradigm - energy of coal, steam (steam engines)
3 technological paradigm - electricity energy
4 technological paradigm - oil energy
5 technological paradigm - atomic energy
6 technological paradigm - energy of hydrogen
The oil lobby will not allow hydrogen energy to come. But if hydrogen energy comes to the human world, then the richest people will be the owners of hydrogen generators.
It's like with bitcoin, the one who first saw the potential in cryptocurrency became the richest person. Vitalik Buterin as an example.
The basis of these structures was and is energy.
Now we are at the end of the 5th and at the beginning of the 6th technological paradigm.
1 technological paradigm - energy of movement of water, wind (mills)
2 technological paradigm - energy of coal, steam (steam engines)
3 technological paradigm - electricity energy
4 technological paradigm - oil energy
5 technological paradigm - atomic energy
6 technological paradigm - energy of hydrogen
The oil lobby will not allow hydrogen energy to come. But if hydrogen energy comes to the human world, then the richest people will be the owners of hydrogen generators.
It's like with bitcoin, the one who first saw the potential in cryptocurrency became the richest person. Vitalik Buterin as an example.
Hydrogen energy: Water instead of oil
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
Someday I suspect the energy problems on this planet will be solved. When it does and the technology to extract hydrogen from water and store in hydride is readily available and cheap, I think it wouldn't be a bad option for the planet. I'm not sure how long we'll be able to keep making batteries with rare earth...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ytg23mDd1a4
^ Watch that video. It's educational. People have been able to run cars on hydrogen extracted from water for decades now. The planet would certainly prefer this method.
Hydrogen energy: Water instead of oil
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
No good. It takes energy to make hydrogen. And hydrogen doesn't have any lubricating factors at all; we need oil.
Jump to: