I just wrote a comment in another thread that might be on-topic here. It made me remember some opinions on the Casascius coins I'd like to share, hopefully to make future coins even cooler! In the post, which is not really worth quoting here, I called Casascius coins "a little conservative" and called for avant-garde design, listing extreme ideas like rectangular coins or a modified yin-yang disc as examples for what I mean by "avant-garde". Let me explain what I'm being negative about, then use the opportunity to compliment what I like.
A gold bar imitation instead of a high-value coin? It uses the
form of a gold bar as emphasis for value. That's not the Bitcoin statement. 100 BTC, let alone talk about 1000, should be worth more than a <5 ounce gold bar if the project succeeds. It feels like coating my coins with a downgrade. The same goes for the silver coin; it's cool, but its classical design draws attention
away from the novel concept of Bitcoin. The hologram saves it from looking like just any coin from just another funny minting project. And holding one might convey the thought "hey, if Bitcoin fails, it's still silver". Almost a symbol of doubt in Bitcoin, at least until the silver value of the coin is significantly below the face value.
Don't get me wrong, the silver coins and gold bars look cool, I'm not saying they're ugly. But in my opinion, they don't live up to memory-stored Bitcoins, so I don't buy any. However, I don't feel that way for all of the products...
Here's my personal best-of-Casascius-design, the reason I love importing from Casascius:
- 1st place: Backside of the 25 BTC coin. The photos on the wiki do not do it justice. The different-size bit-string rings with gold surface give a mystic texture and reflection of light. they almost, but not quite match color and structure density of the hologram, making both fit together yet marking them different. The result is awesome. Just totally awesome. At first glance, it looks like gold from a pirate movie, but at another look it might be Sci-Fi instead. Did I say awesome? I need more of these coins.
- 2nd place: New holograms, a.k.a. backside of the second series 1 BTC coin. Futuristic hologram with 3D-effect, window with the identification key, denomination in black bars, I love it all. Admittedly, I only saw the changes for 2nd series on photos so far, but unless something was downgraded from the first series that isn't visible on photos, this will look epic.
- 3rd place: Front of the 1 BTC coins. Brass is a beautiful, yet inexpensive material; the whole design speaks "merger of the old and new". The Latin motto and the different structure between the inner disc and outer ring give the coin a very sophisticated look.
One special mention: on the 25 BTC front, the black text against the gold surroundings is very cool. Ah, the 25-coin; just had another person who wants one, time to resupply.
On my wish for avant-garde: the examples given were probably too extreme, and I see that something from my speedy brainstorming would just look stupid. But my gut feeling tells me there's another step up possible; something to distinguish higher-value Casascius coins from ordinary coins around the world. But maybe not so much the "heavy gold thing" way, but emphasizing complexity and beauty of design, just the way the Bitcoin protocol does (in the parts I don't complain about
).
Remember you are the dominant minting facility of the dominant currency of the future! This is the "feel" customers ask for. It's quite justified to add some sort of trademark design element. The backside has the holograms, and these serve the purpose very well; but the shape itself... mh, I dunno. Maybe it's time for me to realize I've produced a sufficiently large wall of text on pointless and subjective thoughts.