Topic: Cash is best for anonymity? (Read 488 times)
indeed for now the cash mesih be a top priority, almost all activities still use cash and transaksipun still with cash, in the state in my country, cash can not be separated from everyday life, even many people who can not use various facilities such as credit cards, visas, and more, for cash on blockchain, I think this is a new breakthrough, good luck in the market
Cash has always been and will be more anonymous than bitcoin. The anonymity of cryptocurrencies is fake. Everyone can track the entire chain from the moment the coin was mined. But bankers and politicians do not call for a ban on cash. 99% of illegal transactions are financed by cash. Bitcoin is accused of all sins because they are afraid to lose control over our money.
Of course they want to ban cash, and the reason for that is very simple they want every single transaction to go through them that way they have all the power, they can freeze your accounts and take away your money and you cannot do anything about it, this is why they hate cash and this is why they hate bitcoin even more because bitcoin even if it's not as anonymous as cash allows you to send money all over the world without the help of the banking system and you can send as much money as you want so let me tell you they hate bitcoin and they hate cash as well and they would ban both of they could. Cash is anonymous to a certain degree but if agencies really want to keep tabs on you and know what you are doing they could find out.
Even with bitcoin it isn't 100 percent anonymous at some point there will be a trail that heads back to you whether it is from an exchange or even a purchase you have made and had mailed to you.
Cash has always been and will be more anonymous than bitcoin. The anonymity of cryptocurrencies is fake. Everyone can track the entire chain from the moment the coin was mined. But bankers and politicians do not call for a ban on cash. 99% of illegal transactions are financed by cash. Bitcoin is accused of all sins because they are afraid to lose control over our money. Even with bitcoin it isn't 100 percent anonymous at some point there will be a trail that heads back to you whether it is from an exchange or even a purchase you have made and had mailed to you.
In my opinion bitcoin is better for transaction of huge amounts anonymously but we will be traced through exchanges since we need to buy bitcoins if we want to use it.
But cash is only better for small amounts if that amount is huge it is hard to transct anonymously but with bitcoin it is just so easy you just need the bitcoin address and send it.
But cash is only better for small amounts if that amount is huge it is hard to transct anonymously but with bitcoin it is just so easy you just need the bitcoin address and send it.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Well I completely agree with you. There is nothing more anonymous than cash right now, and that's why the argument that bitcoin is used for criminal activities is a complete nonsense. Of course that it's hard to make some transactions with cash in an anonymous way, like international transactions, since you can't just walk around with a bad full of cash and travel to another country to make a payment. The amount of things you can buy using cash only is limited, at least in my country it is, and it's exactly because how anonymous cash is.
As for 85% of tx being made with cash, I would say it depends on what you consider a cash transaction. I don't think that 85% of tx are maid with live cash since most users prefer to use debit cards, and those are not really anonymous. They are for tax purposes, if you don't use your financial number, but they are recorded by your bank.
Cash is anonymous to a certain degree but if agencies really want to keep tabs on you and know what you are doing they could find out.
Even with bitcoin it isn't 100 percent anonymous at some point there will be a trail that heads back to you whether it is from an exchange or even a purchase you have made and had mailed to you.
Even with bitcoin it isn't 100 percent anonymous at some point there will be a trail that heads back to you whether it is from an exchange or even a purchase you have made and had mailed to you.
Bitcoin is often described as an anonymous currency because it is possible to send and receive bitcoins without giving any personally identifying information. But in Bitcoin, your pseudonym is the address to which you receive Bitcoin. Every transaction involving that address is stored forever in the blockchain. If your address is ever linked to your identity, every transaction will be linked to you. So Bitcoin transactions are not anonymous. So cash is better for anonymity in some way. Cash does not require any personal information between both parties involved in a transaction.
Envelopes with cash are and will continue to be the method of use for the corrupt politicians, but they also hate when the people use cash to avoid taxes, this is why their agenda ahs been a very clear one: to kill cash, but to release a digital currency that's closed source for total control of the masses, while they would have access to this code through backdoors, in other words: the elite wanted a closed source currency in which they would do trades behind the curtains since they would be the only ones with access to the deep code. This was their ultimate dream, which died when bitcoin was released and busted their mind control Orwellian bubble. Now they hate bitcoin because it is an alternative to their closed source, centralized, federated hell.
They already have fiat money as in non-cash which pretty much counts as a closed-source digital currency. Public doesn't know who pays whom via bank transfers but the government can trace every transaction made by anyone using the local currency unless cash as in coins and bills is used. In this manner, I don't think that their "ultimate dream" has actually died because it is not a dream to begin with, and it definitely ain't gonna die any time soon.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Anonymity in terms of what ? I mean whether it is payment made to black market for buying drugs, alcohol, hemp or whatever thing those people do for $$$$ or whether it is about the payment in general where you dont want to show publicly where you spend money? In both the cases cash can be tracked by some means. The banks, FBI, or regulatory bodies can tackle transactions very easily by using their tools and techniques. So its no wonder blunder that wether they are using the cash. Cash is not miracle which can not be tracked. Bitcoin however can provide some sort of pseudo anonymous nature and thus make it far good than the cash. At least it can keep everything in the public ledger with private keys and can just show from which address the transaction is being done but it cant tell your identity. So its still anonymous.
Cash is bills and coins, but what you refer to in your post is correctly called non-cash money.
I don't agree. Every bill has their own serial number so it's very easy to track cash as well as Bitcoin. It's not useful with big purchase with cash and it's too much to carry around hugh amount of cash with you all the time.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Anonymity in terms of what ? I mean whether it is payment made to black market for buying drugs, alcohol, hemp or whatever thing those people do for $$$$ or whether it is about the payment in general where you dont want to show publicly where you spend money? In both the cases cash can be tracked by some means. The banks, FBI, or regulatory bodies can tackle transactions very easily by using their tools and techniques. So its no wonder blunder that wether they are using the cash. Cash is not miracle which can not be tracked. Bitcoin however can provide some sort of pseudo anonymous nature and thus make it far good than the cash. At least it can keep everything in the public ledger with private keys and can just show from which address the transaction is being done but it cant tell your identity. So its still anonymous.
Envelopes with cash are and will continue to be the method of use for the corrupt politicians, but they also hate when the people use cash to avoid taxes, this is why their agenda ahs been a very clear one: to kill cash, but to release a digital currency that's closed source for total control of the masses, while they would have access to this code through backdoors, in other words: the elite wanted a closed source currency in which they would do trades behind the curtains since they would be the only ones with access to the deep code. This was their ultimate dream, which died when bitcoin was released and busted their mind control Orwellian bubble. Now they hate bitcoin because it is an alternative to their closed source, centralized, federated hell.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Well I completely agree with you. There is nothing more anonymous than cash right now, and that's why the argument that bitcoin is used for criminal activities is a complete nonsense. Of course that it's hard to make some transactions with cash in an anonymous way, like international transactions, since you can't just walk around with a bad full of cash and travel to another country to make a payment. The amount of things you can buy using cash only is limited, at least in my country it is, and it's exactly because how anonymous cash is.
As for 85% of tx being made with cash, I would say it depends on what you consider a cash transaction. I don't think that 85% of tx are maid with live cash since most users prefer to use debit cards, and those are not really anonymous. They are for tax purposes, if you don't use your financial number, but they are recorded by your bank.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Are you taking about cash without involving banks? Yes they are anonymous, risky and inconvenient at same time. To go outside and have a meeting for every deal in cash is too much time taking and risky.
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
Indeed majority of transactions are currently in cash but they are through banks, means they are not anonymous.All your points are simply illogical and you are just promoting this ICO in your signature.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
If we are talking about the moeny you get for selling a service or goods from another person who also got it from another person than yes, in that case the cash would be untracable and thus best to make anonymous payments, but iof we are talking about cash that you withdraw from the bank using your credit card, than no, the modern world society has paracticaly stopped using direct pysical cash, everyone uses credit cards for everything, cahs will always be regulated by govermmnets so using it will never be anonymous even if it is on blockchain. Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
I guess cash is more anonymous than crypto. But just like parts of a blockchain every note is numbered and registered.
Big chunks of cash are not safe carry though. I think blockchains might be not the most ananymous way to store cash, at least it is safe if done right.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
It depends on how Financial monitoring service works in your country and how are their regulations,For example in my country,there are very strict regulations and noone can send more than 30k $ without monitoring and they always ask for an answer, 'where is this money from?',anyway it depends on you and on your goverment,there are countries where you can easily make anonymous payments and conversely,what about blockchain,there is the same situation if investigative authorities doubt in transaction they will check it and it will not be anonymous anymore.
Yes I agree a lot of people do corruption using cash because its untraceable, but cash only work in a country that had same currency, if it's different country then it can raise suspicions if you convert huge amount of other currency to fiat, and also it is dangerous to do transaction that has a huge amount, so it's not too convenient to used
Cash is one of the most commonly used medium that corrupt people use to receive bribe from innocent people. This is because there is no record of such a transaction. I mean if you do a bank transfer, the transaction is recorded online and can be shown as a proof of corruption. However, even cash is not safe these days.
You know how it is used to catch those corrupt officials. A chemical is used is put on those currency notes and as soon as the person takes that money his finger prints are saved there. The investigating team then catches the corrupt person red handed.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
Well I completely agree with you. There is nothing more anonymous than cash right now, and that's why the argument that bitcoin is used for criminal activities is a complete nonsense. Of course that it's hard to make some transactions with cash in an anonymous way, like international transactions, since you can't just walk around with a bad full of cash and travel to another country to make a payment. The amount of things you can buy using cash only is limited, at least in my country it is, and it's exactly because how anonymous cash is.
As for 85% of tx being made with cash, I would say it depends on what you consider a cash transaction. I don't think that 85% of tx are maid with live cash since most users prefer to use debit cards, and those are not really anonymous. They are for tax purposes, if you don't use your financial number, but they are recorded by your bank.
Cash is still being the best way if you want to make anonymous payments. Do you agree with it?
Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
It is best for the small transactions but how about the transaction in millions you can't transfer big amount via cash,if you do you will be taxed but in bitcoin there is no tax no problem you just need the sender address then you can able to send anywhere in the world.Also 85% of transactions are currently in cash.
What do you think about cash on blockchain, backed by gold ( https://goldencurrency.world )?
It's still a good idea for limited purposes only we can use cash transactions in small and medium enterprise for easy and convenient payment without any form of confirmation of the owner, but how about big transactions that required documents. Different from cryptocurrency which the transaction done via Internet.
Jump to: