Topic: Casinobit - LIVE ROULETTE - [INVEST] - BEST CASINO OF 2013 - page 9. (Read 82436 times)
Why aren't we able to get a definite answer!??
I think I have a claim to 5% of profits prior to the "investment" feature. I'm not entirely sure how much that is and I don't really want to look through the records to find out. The contract is dated May 9th when around 50btc were wagered on the site and I think the site funds were pulled prior to the investment feature at around 1500btc wagered.
Maybe this has no/little value, I don't know.
Would concur with that but did you recieve BTC back after "investment" feature, because that is on you to recover prior to investment option releasing in my opinion, ultimately you are still in a bad place.
Ultimately though you own 5% of the company and have made that public now, not just invested in it as per you apparent contract. If I was you I would not "extort" (even though you appear not to be), your 5% of the company, I would as a sign of good faith be willing to release information of Casinobit as a way to protect yourself, because now people have someone with known involvement and easily could attack you to get to him.
I received no return on my ownership stake, but I expected to. I would like to sell the stake for as much as I can get. I will only release information to the buyer.
I own 5% of Casinobit.net (non-voting share) and I am willing to sell my ownership stake to any party interested in owning a piece of the company. I have a signed contract with the owner with both of our government IDs scanned and attached. This stake was a part of a contract in exchange for an interest-free loan I provided to the site several months ago. I have not received any profits from the site. I will amend the contract indicating a transfer of ownership and send it to the buyer in PDF form. Please send offers via PM. I will only release details of the transaction to the buyer. I have substantial forum rep and rep elsewhere (heatware, hardforums, etc.) Thanks for your interest.
-Eric
-Eric
So basically you are offering your 5% shares for BTC to allow someone to "see" your contract and find out who Casinobit is? Boy that is shady in my opinion.
As a 5% share holder you own 5% of the debt to creditors, imo and assuming its 300 btc your debit is 15 btc.
I think I have a claim to 5% of profits prior to the "investment" feature. I'm not entirely sure how much that is and I don't really want to look through the records to find out. The contract is dated May 9th when around 50btc were wagered on the site and I think the site funds were pulled prior to the investment feature at around 1500btc wagered.
Maybe this has no/little value, I don't know.
I own 5% of Casinobit.net (non-voting share) and I am willing to sell my ownership stake to any party interested in owning a piece of the company. I have a signed contract with the owner with both of our government IDs scanned and attached. This stake was a part of a contract in exchange for an interest-free loan I provided to the site several months ago. I have not received any profits from the site. I will amend the contract indicating a transfer of ownership and send it to the buyer in PDF form. Please send offers via PM. I will only release details of the transaction to the buyer. I have substantial forum rep and rep elsewhere (heatware, hardforums, etc.) Thanks for your interest.
-Eric
-Eric
What people don't seem to understand is that these things happen, if Dooglus wouldn't have 110k sitting on the table at the time of the error he would probably find himself in the same situation.
Hard to understand how you can equate Dooglus' mistake with your gross mismanagement and failure to pay back real BTC. Dooglus allowed bets to be placed that never should have been placed; the simple solution was to "undo" those bets. Nobody lost any BTC that they shouldn't have gained in the first place. You allowed a completely broken investment system to severely overpay early investors and allowed bettors to bet BTC that was not paid out when they won. Dooglus took about 48 hours to make things right; we still have no idea how long you will take (if ever).
Ah.... No. You are just a filthy scammer as it was obvious from minute 1.
You really are a class act, so you steal people's money to invest in another casino, then you try and make it seem like your doing them a favor by investing there money in another casino to pay them back.
As I have already said security was compromised, a small bug was exploited and BTC was lost (and as I recall I have mentioned that we will not be taking ANY responsibility in that event due to our safety margin being non existent, e.g. 0% fees), if I have really wanted to steal peoples money I could disappear with the 880BTC invested in the system at its peak but I didn't. Instead I have made the best situation out of what happened and took full responsibility as well as have agreed to make everyone whole, I have even agreed to sink my own 13,000$ in the process of making everyone whole and I am sitting here with a fever working actively to ultimately repay everyone owed despite the constant threats etc. How am I a thief again?
The offer was altruistic in nature to begin with, I had no intention of making any profit in the first few months.
The 100BTC is enough to cover about (roughly) 1/3 of the debt, if I could repay it fully I would.
You have no idea of what running a business means, you speak about "updating people" like those who were scammed should be grateful to you for not just disappearing.
You started a business, people trusted you their hard earned money, you screwed up: just be a man, take responsibility and use that 100BTC to pay back the money you owe.
How many BTC did you sell the site for?
I find it hard to believe that he sold the site...yet alone that he got BTC for it! Maybe the scripts and pages...probably not the name. CasinoBit is a ruined name now.
I would say that a casino that stay solvent is far superior; regardless, the games it offers.
So wait are you saying there's no value in offering an original idea and failing miserably. I can't seem to wrap my head around how being generic and profitable is better than being original and not profitable. Casinobit please enlighten us all with your maverick wisdom.
I would say that a casino that stay solvent is far superior; regardless, the games it offers.
How many BTC did you sell the site for?
Yes I see where you're coming from, I will lend BTC from a person who owns equity in the company in the event of someone winning a large sum of money to bail all of our asses out. I have already done so previously.
Better be a maverick or a true original who is in debt rather than a copycat who offers generic games.
And my statement still stands, I would cover any bets up to 2BTC. It's significantly easier to get additional loans to cover variance as well.
Yeah you and your dirt ass cheap if not free video feed and a buggy as hell site are a true maverick.
Better be a maverick with a dirt ass cheap video and a buggy website than a copycat who offers generic chinese games.
What people don't seem to understand is that these things happen, if Dooglus wouldn't have 110k sitting on the table at the time of the error he would probably find himself in the same situation.
Hoorah for the failed maverick. It's amazing that you compare yourself to others that actually pay debts. I really hope your not this clueless. Way to go fallen maverick.
Yes I see where you're coming from, I will lend BTC from a person who owns equity in the company in the event of someone winning a large sum of money to bail all of our asses out. I have already done so previously.
Better be a maverick or a true original who is in debt rather than a copycat who offers generic games.
And my statement still stands, I would cover any bets up to 2BTC. It's significantly easier to get additional loans to cover variance as well.
Yeah you and your dirt ass cheap if not free video feed and a buggy as hell site are a true maverick.
Better be a maverick with a dirt ass cheap video and a buggy website than a copycat who offers generic chinese games.
What people don't seem to understand is that these things happen, if Dooglus wouldn't have 110k sitting on the table at the time of the error he would probably find himself in the same situation.
Yes I see where you're coming from, I will lend BTC from a person who owns equity in the company in the event of someone winning a large sum of money to bail all of our asses out. I have already done so previously.
Better be a maverick or a true original who is in debt rather than a copycat who offers generic games.
And my statement still stands, I would cover any bets up to 2BTC. It's significantly easier to get additional loans to cover variance as well.
Yeah you and your dirt ass cheap if not free video feed and a buggy as hell site are a true maverick.
Yes I see where you're coming from, I will lend BTC from a person who owns equity in the company in the event of someone winning a large sum of money to bail all of our asses out. I have already done so previously.
Better be a maverick or a true original who is in debt rather than a copycat who offers generic games.
And my statement still stands, I would cover any bets up to 2BTC. It's significantly easier to get additional loans to cover variance as well.
September 30, 2013, 11:49:24 PM
So, when are we going to be paid 
You (bettor) will be at the highest priority. The new owners should put up their new casino soon enough.
What prevents you from paying the 100btc to the users/investors right now (approximately 1/3rd), and then when the new casino goes live, paying the other 2/3rds?
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
Because putting the 100BTC towards the bankroll of the new casino will greatly accelerate repays as higher bets will be possible, plus I expect to get at least a part of those 100BTC back, as they are my own.
He has no interest in paying anyone. Otherwise he would have already began to. He's claiming to fund someone else's casino with the money he stole then claiming those profits will make everyone whole. What he doesn't realize is the 100BTC he's investing needs to make 300BTC++ to cover everyone. So unless there's millions wagered in this new casino the reality of anyone getting payed is slim to none.
Troll harder
Oh so he won't be actually paying anyone unless that casino becomes a wild success and generates enough profit for his investment share to cover the btc owed here. Yeah this is dumb if that's what he is planning to do.
Of course if we'd all be listening to your suggestions we'd all be running generic chinese games and paying 20% fees to our game owners in Bulgaria.
Your level of stupidity is mind boggling. Had you coded/ran a successful venture you would understand how casinos work, but based on your logic of accerated profits to accept larger bets your clearly just a clueless gambler. Good luck turning your 100BTC into over 3 times that much to make people whole. Keep dreaming man. Let me keep trolling though you fucking moron, man up already and pay what you owe deadbeat.
September 30, 2013, 08:56:12 PM
Yes I see where you're coming from, I will lend BTC from a person who owns equity in the company in the event of someone winning a large sum of money to bail all of our asses out. I have already done so previously.
September 30, 2013, 07:28:14 PM
So, when are we going to be paid
You (bettor) will be at the highest priority. The new owners should put up their new casino soon enough.
What prevents you from paying the 100btc to the users/investors right now (approximately 1/3rd), and then when the new casino goes live, paying the other 2/3rds?
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
Because putting the 100BTC towards the bankroll of the new casino will greatly accelerate repays as higher bets will be possible, plus I expect to get at least a part of those 100BTC back, as they are my own.
He has no interest in paying anyone. Otherwise he would have already began to. He's claiming to fund someone else's casino with the money he stole then claiming those profits will make everyone whole. What he doesn't realize is the 100BTC he's investing needs to make 300BTC++ to cover everyone. So unless there's millions wagered in this new casino the reality of anyone getting payed is slim to none.
Troll harder
Oh so he won't be actually paying anyone unless that casino becomes a wild success and generates enough profit for his investment share to cover the btc owed here. Yeah this is dumb if that's what he is planning to do.
Of course if we'd all be listening to your suggestions we'd all be running generic chinese games and paying 20% fees to our game owners in Bulgaria.
September 30, 2013, 12:37:49 PM
Which is the new casino you're going to invest? Is it open to everyone for invest in the bankroll?
This casino is being sold, I will be buying into the new bankroll with 100% of the profits going to cover debt. Making it open for everyone wouldn't look too good because I know people will claim that this is some ponzi follow-up so until the whole debt is repaid they are unlikely to open it.
Someone invested his life-savings in Casinobit? I'm flattered
What prevents you from paying the 100btc to the users/investors right now (approximately 1/3rd), and then when the new casino goes live, paying the other 2/3rds?
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
He has no interest in paying anyone. Otherwise he would have already began to. He's claiming to fund someone else's casino with the money he stole then claiming those profits will make everyone whole. What he doesn't realize is the 100BTC he's investing needs to make 300BTC++ to cover everyone. So unless there's millions wagered in this new casino the reality of anyone getting payed is slim to none.
Oh so he won't be actually paying anyone unless that casino becomes a wild success and generates enough profit for his investment share to cover the btc owed here. Yeah this is dumb if that's what he is planning to do.
September 30, 2013, 12:10:36 PM
Which is the new casino you're going to invest? Is it open to everyone for invest in the bankroll?
This casino is being sold, I will be buying into the new bankroll with 100% of the profits going to cover debt. Making it open for everyone wouldn't look too good because I know people will claim that this is some ponzi follow-up so until the whole debt is repaid they are unlikely to open it.
Someone invested his life-savings in Casinobit? I'm flattered
What prevents you from paying the 100btc to the users/investors right now (approximately 1/3rd), and then when the new casino goes live, paying the other 2/3rds?
I don't see any logic in your actions. However, I did not see any logic in your actions in the past 2 months, so I guess that is expected.
He has no interest in paying anyone. Otherwise he would have already began to. He's claiming to fund someone else's casino with the money he stole then claiming those profits will make everyone whole. What he doesn't realize is the 100BTC he's investing needs to make 300BTC++ to cover everyone. So unless there's millions wagered in this new casino the reality of anyone getting payed is slim to none.
Jump to: