KYC is straight straightforward demands, if a casino has it, is not something that will be hidden so at least the gambler who sign up on the site will have the chance to quickly spot them and also be sure to put in place the necessary arrangement and waiting to when to be asked to supply the necessary documents to verify the accounts.
But if any casino does not state that there are KYC compliances it the means that they are practically abusing the right of the gambler if they demand for it along the line.
Kyc should be accepted by the gambler,because it was the direct demand by the gambling sites on the gambler.The gambler can deposit to the gambling site without any restriction to the gambling site,even you can play the gambling site without the kyc.But the withdraw need the kyc verification compulsory,have you think this is why and what reason behind this.The reason was to stop the promotion of the money laundering in the gambling by the way of gambling.So it will ask the gambler to do Kyc at the time of withdraw.
If don't want to accept the KYC provisions the only way is to play at non-KYC casino or don't need to gamble at an online casino.
But when choosing to use non-KYC casino it will not guarantee that the customer will not be asked for KYC because there are also many casinos labeled non-KYC but when the customer has a big win and withdraws it the casino asks for KYC as withdrawal requirement.
Such cases have occurred lot.
I always advise not to mind KYC and forget about anonymity forget about the bad things because trusted casino with good reputation can definitely protect whatever is their customer data.
Moreover if we talk about its use KYC can be very useful for both parties so that no one is at a loss here.
Casinos always try to provide the best for customers and we gamblers who as casino customers must also comply with every policy that has been set without exception.
Because you say that only doing the KYC to the casinos that are most reliable is the best thing to do, then this leaves other casinos to do the things that touch them much harder, because in the first instance things when they are treated as What to do so that a person can do a KYC is the best, although I am very Reluctant when it comes to saying that a KYC will Bring us benefits, I think that is not the case, the KYC is just a requirement that is required for have control by governments, so in this order of things we have to put a lot of emphasis on what we want to achieve in a particular casino, we can have all the intention to play and know how the case is, for that the best It will always be necessary to review the ANN thread to have complete clarity about what we are getting into, there are people who are in new casinos and who require KYC , they comply and well , at Least for me , if Privacy is important, that is what we must have If we want, then I would give importance to this.
When a person wants to be calm with their money without Others knowing, that should be respected, that is something that should not be Considered Against, we Deserve what we want, when we talk about KYC yes, it causes annoyance , especially when someone is going to withdraw their money and then they tell them that they have to comply with the KYC, and sometimes it is quick, but it is more annoying when the process lasts a long time, that is, I am not saying anything that the process lasts a while of hours, because it is something normal while they Verify, but taking more than 24 or 48 hours I think is an abuse, I have seen that some publish that out of rage they bet the money they had deposited and lose it, and that They Classify it as a casino strategy so that the money stays there and they cannot get it out, that is something that does not suit me, this type of casino is the one that I avoid in its entirety, but that is why the issue is delicate .