Topic: CasinosBlockchain - Crypto casinos, simplified - page 2. (Read 610 times)

🌍 Bet on a Greener Tomorrow with Casinos Blockchain and CryptoLeo Casino! ♻️


Calling all crypto gamers!


On September 20th, join us for World Clean Up Day and make a real difference while playing your favorite games! 🌿

Casinos Blockchain and CryptoLeo Casino are teaming up for a special charity event where we’ll match all first-time deposits up to 50% when you sign up at CryptoLeo here or on our website.

Play, win, and support the environment—all at once! Proceeds go to the awesome Clean Earth Foundatio . 🌳

💰 We’ll share the proof of transaction when the campaign ends.


Here’s How It Works:


1. Sign up at CryptoLeo.
2. Deposit, and we’ll match 50% of it.
3. Play knowing you’re contributing to a greener planet!

Let’s prove the power of the crypto community to make a positive impact on our planet! 🌎🎲

If you have any questions or comments, drop them in the thread below.

It’s not always about who can offer the biggest bonus. At Casinos Blockchain, we’re more interested in who can offer the best value bonus. To us, a big part of value has to do with wagering requirements.

Have you noticed how it’s been a lot harder to find crypto casino bonuses with decent wagering requirements these days?

What do you think constitutes a low-wagering bonus?

In our experience, the industry standard for crypto casino bonus wagering requirements ranges from 40x to 50x.

CryptoLeo’s 5,000 USDT bonus with 50x wagering or 7Bit’s 5.25 BTC bonus with 40x wagering are two examples.

If you think about it, these requirements are really high!


Look at it like this: if you claimed CryptoLeo’s $5,000-equivalent bonus with a 50x wagering requirement, you’d need to wager $250,000 (!) before you can withdraw any bonus-related winnings.

We’ve even seen wagering requirements as high as 100x before (attached to Rocketpot’s old 1 BTC welcome bonus).

With all this in mind, we think of bonuses with wagering requirements of 30x and lower as far below industry standards… a.k.a, low-wagering bonuses.




The good news is that these aren’t the only low-wagering bonuses out there . Our new casino list has a ‘low-wagering’ feature you can use to find even more approachable bonuses. Just click on the image and explore all the best low-wagering bonuses!

@OP, now this is a standard ANN thread for your casino directory. I had checked your website in the past too, but I just checked the 'Anonymous Bitcoin Casinos' site list, which is providing misleading information. All those casinos have KYC verification requirement mentioned in the terms which you have addressed as 'no KYC' casino. You have to remove them from that page.

Now I remember why your name is already familiar aside that user the ign of Ana from OG Dota2.You should create a bitcointalk account name after your website to easily notice that your account is a representative of this specific review site once you are commenting outside this thread.

Also, You should merge this post to the one above since posting consecutive on same thread without other users replying after your last post is not allowed. You should reply all the question above in one post through the use of quote function.

Launch more bonus dedicated for Bitcointalk community. Best of luck.

Thanks for the feedback, everyone! We've passed it on to our product team. But just to address a few common topics some of you have brought up:

How we review casinos: We sign up, deposit, and play at all the casinos we review. You can have a look at our review process (https://casinosblockchain.io/review-process/) for the nitty-gritty details.

Missing brands: We certainly haven't reviewed every crypto casino out there, but we're trying our best! So if you don't see your favorite platforms on our list, let us know. We've already made a note to check out LiveCasino and Sportsbet, thanks notblox1!

Trustpilot: It’s true that our scores don’t always align with Trustpilot’s. That’s because we try out each platform by ourselves and consider every element of the casino to get an average score, while players typically use Trustpilot exclusively for complaints. Even so, in the case of Cryptoleo, we do address some of the same concerns in our review https://casinosblockchain.io/cryptoleo-casino-review/#licensing-and-safety

Moving on, we appreciate your honest feedback—please keep it coming! 

Hey! So, to answer your question, this is indeed our first announcement thread, but we’ve been reviewing casinos since 2018. It’s also not our first time on Bitcointalk. For the past few years, we’ve organized casino awards where our users voted for their favorite platforms. You can check out the results here:
Links

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62111075
 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.59683278

I can say, it is indeed a good start for them. They have done a very good job when it comes to their reviews, it is a comprehensive one. Aside from their own review, you can also find user's reviews after their review. I hope they will only publish actual comments from users and not resort to non-existing persons. Some of the comments are useful as they can guide potential players on what to look at or be careful about upon accessing the site.

One more thing, I checked one of their content writer's profile (Fern Bamber) if she is indeed real person, and it seems she is. Some of the content creators deployed by other sites are AI, wherein, they will only generate a generic content. But this review site seems to do their actual job in reviewing those casinos.

You are stating that you are in the casino review business since 2018, but I've never seen your website on Bitcointalk.org and this is your first announcement thread on the forum. Where have you been in the last six years?
The most popular casinos on your list already have announcement threads and signature campaigns on the forum, so maybe you should promote your crypto casino review website somewhere else. I like the fact that you've included non-KYC casinos and VPN-friendly casinos, even though I don't trust the casinos, that claim to be non-KYC and VPN friendly. They could always change their policies and start demanding KYC and banning users, who are using a VPN.
Anyway, welcome to the forum and good luck with your casino review website, OP.

Your username OP made me remember of one great dota 2 player, maybe you know him. Ana of OG and there's a .bit on his in-game so it was ana.bit.

Going on with your actual, just as what others said. I also thought that this was a casino but you're giving reviews to the other casinos and probably including your referral link at the end of your reviews.

While no one stops you from doing so and it's not prohibited at all, I wish you more reviews as well as you're missing betcoin in there.

Also, you have included 1xbit there for which there are tons of bad reviews from the forum. Another thing is it's no longer nitrogensports.eu but nitrobetting.eu.

I just visited your website and I must say it is nice work you have there. It's highly responsive with nice colours and user-friendliness, although it is about affiliate stuff, but with benefits. Just ensure it is unbiased and continues to be done in a unique way which can only make it always acceptable.

But still, there is a need for you to continue to update the casinos there, this is unless you want to go by the plan of the most popular ones only which I won't advise you to do. Many casinos are still missing, and perhaps you might just browse through the ones that are being talked about on this forum for updates, at least to start with before adding extras.

I know it is a long work that can't be done so fast. All the best.

I don't normally put much stock into review sites as I feel like the reviews are paid for. It's 1 thing to ask users to check your site out and give some constructive feedback, but totally different for you to ask a site to pay you xxx amount of $$$ and you write up some bs review that may or may not be true.

I'd rather check to see if a casino has a thread here, has active representatives, and stays in touch with their community.

he just put some data that honestly is not data that could indicate that the casino is trustworthy, but this is the review model he chose, my concern is that on this op site have casino with many complaints, from old complaints to recent complaints, for example about the CryptoLeo casino, on the OP's website it gave a Rating of 4.7, it is close to the maximum score, now when you search for the CryptoLeo casino on Google, we find a another scenario that is not a good scenario, they have a lot of complaints against them at trustpilot and at the casino.guro

on trustpilot



source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cryptoleo.com

There are complaints against them that were made this June and looking at their rating on trustpilot we see this:



some people could say: "trustpilot is not trustworthy", when there are many pages containing negative comments and coming from people who have already made many comments on trustpilot, then we are facing legitimate complaints, in my opinion, but how are the complaints about this casino at casino.guro? I went to casino.guro to check and to my shock:

on casino.guro



I think that the op review site should not be seen as a 100% reliable review site, when people see a casino listed on the op site, they will need to go to other sites to investigate if the casino listed on the op site is trustworthy, If they confirm on other sites that the casino listed on the op site is really trustworthy, then people can create an account at the casino that is listed on the op site.

if you click the "quick facts" which can be found right next to "visit website" then click "read review" which can be found under the ratings and "visit website" after clicking the "quick facts". As for his review process, you can visit this page on his website https://casinosblockchain.io/review-process/, it is shown there what process he makes when reviewing a gambling site.

Op I must tell you the truth even your website needs review and if you want us to review your CasinosBlockchain for you then I advise you to launch a review campaign then the forum will do a thorough review foe you. Because from what I saw in your website (CasinosBlockchain) I didn't see any review you did there. Yes I saw the rating but what did you used for rating? Even though you have used the casino before your rate it in your website, you have to make it clear that your rate is from this or that but you didn't make any input on that and just rate it.

I didn't see this as casino review site for now until you improve on the site. But that is not withstanding, you have put your effort to develop the site to this standard. You are welcome. And to have more traffic improve on the reviews.

Welcome to the forum, this is bitcointalk, i will first advise that you have to be specific on what your platform is all about, if you're a casino then make it clear and if its all about affiliate platforms then its better we know where you stand, and if you're into the two all together, all that matters is for you to have a definite destination on your purpose here, i hope you have got a lot to offer for us on this forum.

I was fooled after reading the thread that this is a new casino but it's not, it's a review site, OP should have added the word review at the end so that many will know about it even though the ANN design is clear.

There are many other popular casinos not reviewed on your site, have you not tested them? No Shuffle I wonder how you review this casino?

One more thing, do you review all the casinos on your forum?

Not sure if he already changed the title because his last edit shows June 17 but upon checking his profile, I can see that he was active this day or earlier.

If we read the title carefully, we can also figure out that it was not a single casino because it says crypto casinos and the first thing that can come to our mind is a casino review site. Speaking of it, not just like but his website is really a casino review site because that is what is said in the OP and also, that is what we can get when we click on their link. I only didn't like their website name. Crypto casinos seems enough already and this is what we can see on their website. Basically, Blockchain-based casinos are those who are fully decentralized and has a Web3 capability.

Welcome to bitcointalk platform. When I first saw your topic, I actually thought it was a casino not until I opened the thread and found out it was a casino review and possibly an affiliate website. I think you should make amends on your thread title or topic so that it does not confuse people just as tranthidung has said.

I had to see for myself how your website looks like and I must say you have a good designed user interface which anyone who visits it can easily navigate through but I think you should have a search engine at the top of your home page because it would be time consuming for a visitor to start load page one after the other before they could get to see the casino they are looking for. Why not put a search engine so that one can just type in the name of the casino they are looking for rather than loading and loading wasting time.

Your topic title is misleading readers that your website is a casino itself. In fact it is not! Because your website is like a casino review and affiliate website, hence I strongly recommend you to pick a more relevant phrase for your topic title.

Anyway, welcome!

A lot of the casinos listed in your "no-kyc" list have clauses in their terms of services that states they may require their users to pass identity verification if deemed necessary. For this reason, I would highly suggest going with "No-mandatory KYC" instead as a title since I think it fits more rather than a flat "no-kyc".

Further, I would also recommend statements about surprise KYC should be reiterated many times in your article.