Pages:
Author

Topic: Cavirtex Private Shares - page 2. (Read 4000 times)

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1010
Ad maiora!
April 25, 2014, 05:42:17 PM
#5
True, because Canada is a tiny market. 34.88 million people as opposed to USA's 313.9 million. VoS is wisely concentrating their regulatory efforts in America, state by state, so consumers can deal with them through their bank easily and quickly. Cavirtex will accept foreign deposits only after VERY lengthy verification process followed by very long waits on deposits with prohibitively high fees. If VoS gains a foothold in the states, follows through, and does it right, they will become top dog.

of course VoS are unproven as to their reliability, and their being based in Quebec gives me pause to doubt. (highest amount of organized crime activity in Canada)
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
April 25, 2014, 08:32:38 AM
#4
I'm a Canadian and I have used CaVirtex for a while. As far as the Canadian market is concerned, they're a high volume exchange and more or less had a corner on the Canadian market because they got all their ducks in a row (KYC and working w/ major Canadian banks etc.) and they remain reliable (for a while they were the only game in town for Canadians), but Vault of Satoshi could very well unseat them as top dog now that VoS is moving forward in the USA state by state, plus VoS has transparent proof of solvency.
CaVirtex charges such exorbitant fees that I kinda wanted to invest at one point if even to reap back a little of those fees and high prices I've paid into them. They MUST be making money, but Vault of Satoshi could become the real mammoth here.

Proof of solvency is cute, but VoS is still a centralized exchange, holding all the bitcoins for the trades, and is thus just as vulnerable as Mt.Gox was. If suddenly the proof of solvency shows that VoS is insolvent, what good does it do for all those that are already using it?

The fact that VoS is multinational is not necessarily a good thing either.

As for Cavirtex, you can calculate what the lion's share of the money they make is by simply multiplying their $80 million total transaction amount by the 3% fees they make (1.5% from the seller, 1.5% from the buyer) and see that they have made $2.4 million in total fees in their businesse's lifetime. It's not that much for a business of 20 employees. Shareholders won't get many dividends with that kind of money. Cavirtex need to grow, and it looks like they are trying to do it very carefully.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1010
Ad maiora!
April 24, 2014, 11:56:34 PM
#3
I'm a Canadian and I have used CaVirtex for a while. As far as the Canadian market is concerned, they're a high volume exchange and more or less had a corner on the Canadian market because they got all their ducks in a row (KYC and working w/ major Canadian banks etc.) and they remain reliable (for a while they were the only game in town for Canadians), but Vault of Satoshi could very well unseat them as top dog now that VoS is moving forward in the USA state by state, plus VoS has transparent proof of solvency.
CaVirtex charges such exorbitant fees that I kinda wanted to invest at one point if even to reap back a little of those fees and high prices I've paid into them. They MUST be making money, but Vault of Satoshi could become the real mammoth here.
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
April 24, 2014, 08:50:29 PM
#2
At his talk at the Bitcoin Expo 2014 in Toronto, Joseph David said that shareholders will be receiving their official shareholder papers by mail sometime in April (IIRC), in batches a week at a time for a few weeks, or something like that.

Basically, they're working on it and should soon send something.
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
April 24, 2014, 08:44:29 PM
#1
I invested in Cavirtex (https://www.cavirtex.com/home) on Havelock Investments.  They have since gone private and were supposed to mail out shareholders certificates and financial information.

I have not received anything yet from the company.

Have any Cavirtex investors out there received anything yet?

Thanks,
Pages:
Jump to: