Is it just me or someone else getting error can't validate CPU msg?
I got n1070 and best i manage to get is around 36-37Mhas/s on vert/mona coin
Topic: CCminer 1.7.6-r10 Fork With Faster Neoscrypt, Lyra2RE and Lyra2REv2 (Read 13223 times)
October 11, 2016, 05:31:03 PM
August 15, 2016, 01:46:58 AM
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version ((
i uploaded it https://www.dropbox.com/s/r5fajizspbjzb9k/cuda_8.0.27_win10.exe?dl=0
August 15, 2016, 12:11:26 AM
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version ((
That's weird as I wanted the sources and downloaded the windows binary instead by mistake.
shame on me ... found some binaries ... will try
August 14, 2016, 04:48:56 PM
what version is that exactly, the same as the last one of epsylon?
August 14, 2016, 04:40:01 PM
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version ((
That's weird as I wanted the sources and downloaded the windows binary instead by mistake.
August 14, 2016, 03:06:18 PM
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
It comes as sources only and requires cuda 8 toolkit to be installed (( My nvidia developer subscription is expired so I cannot download cuda 8 RC and build new nanashi version ((
August 14, 2016, 08:19:30 AM
this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15840607 caught my attention
there is somewhere a r12 release?
there is somewhere a r12 release?
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
faster for lyra2v2 or just a porting from epsylon work?
August 14, 2016, 07:08:06 AM
this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15840607 caught my attention
there is somewhere a r12 release?
there is somewhere a r12 release?
Hi,
there is no 1.7.6 r12 release look at Nanashis OneDrive here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOt
>>> But there is a new and faster CCminer 1.8-r2 Fork release! <<<
August 06, 2016, 02:31:41 PM
this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15840607 caught my attention
there is somewhere a r12 release?
there is somewhere a r12 release?
July 29, 2016, 08:21:37 AM
any news on the poolside hashrate issue?
thanks!
thanks!
I fixed it myself.
Not trivial.
July 28, 2016, 09:59:02 AM
any news on the poolside hashrate issue?
thanks!
thanks!
July 24, 2016, 03:47:31 AM
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry
this mean that Volta will be bad, because in the future every class of gpu will have those
maybe there will be new tool to make mining good with them
talking about the lyra2 algo, i think it need an optimization, if you can ask nanashi to look at it, because it's using 50% of the tdp
so i suspect that the hashrate should be doubled
July 24, 2016, 02:49:28 AM
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry
July 24, 2016, 02:44:38 AM
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
1080 does not scale right, too expensive without offering overall a good hash, maybe only in a few algo like lbry
July 24, 2016, 02:34:21 AM
Now neoscrypt mining is good only in linux with pascal. On windows 1070 can do 1mhs only with high oc and more then 100% tdp power. Maybe you should wait for windows fix driver with new wddm mode that hope will come at Aug,2.
July 23, 2016, 05:08:29 PM
which would be better (mhs/watts) for neoscript mining, 1070 or 1080? Tks.
July 21, 2016, 02:03:06 AM
with your version i'm getting 900khs sam as 1.8 from epsylon, but i see people reaching above 1MH, with same oc on same system, on linux you get,, more but i don't care about linux
so maybe something on my end, but i doubt, since all other algo are on par...
so maybe something on my end, but i doubt, since all other algo are on par...
July 17, 2016, 08:51:55 PM
Sorry Sir but I've tested both the 980ti and 970 and they are also slower. Please tell nanashi to rebase his work on latest djm34 or tpruvot (which is the same as djm but with pascal fixes which in my case are slowing down maxwells).
Faster in Neoscrypt
Nanashi
1080
980
latest Tpruvot
1070
980ti
970
It looks like this. Why the difference is occurred?
Nanashi reads this thread so he will consider your opinion.
July 17, 2016, 04:17:29 PM
thanks but why comparing the hashrate with the old djm34 version? the new one is much faster.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's.
EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's.
EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
1.7.6-r10 Neoscrypt codes are based on SP's ccminer 1.5.80.
New ccminer 1.8 is already known by Nanashi.
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/4ca7b5a404e8acb8e863c8171beb256034f303c8
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/a4196b341d74b5abeba8239da8c7125ed4fe0f82
This code is roughly the same as 1.5.80. A Different point is the default intensity settings. And We checkd its Neoscrypt hashrate is not faster than 1.5.80.
But 1070 seems an exception...? Anyway, Thanks for testing.
Sorry Sir but I've tested both the 980ti and 970 and they are also slower. Please tell nanashi to rebase his work on latest djm34 or tpruvot (which is the same as djm but with pascal fixes which in my case are slowing down maxwells).
July 17, 2016, 11:57:02 AM
thanks but why comparing the hashrate with the old djm34 version? the new one is much faster.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's.
EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's.
EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
1.7.6-r10 Neoscrypt codes are based on SP's ccminer 1.5.80.
New ccminer 1.8 is already known by Nanashi.
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/4ca7b5a404e8acb8e863c8171beb256034f303c8
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/commit/a4196b341d74b5abeba8239da8c7125ed4fe0f82
This code is roughly the same as 1.5.80. A Different point is the default intensity settings. And We checkd its Neoscrypt hashrate is not faster than 1.5.80.
But 1070 seems an exception...? Anyway, Thanks for testing.
Jump to: