hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1095. (Read 2347601 times)
This is a deviation from the Stratum specification and should be fixed poolside - diff changes are to be enforced on the next work message sent where the cleanjobs parameter is true.
The Pools doesn't always follow protocol.Fuck the pools.
Solomine to avoid fluctation.
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity.the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980
Linux or windows?
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity.the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980
Linux or windows?
I am seeing 3 miner on www.fullnode.co donation address.
http://yaamp.com/?address=1EVvGwF6B3QUbYqcsvw1CudsF49sua25Qe
Thanks to all for getting on board.
http://yaamp.com/?address=1EVvGwF6B3QUbYqcsvw1CudsF49sua25Qe
Thanks to all for getting on board.
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity.
the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity.
the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980
what are the parameters you are using? ...
#crysx
what are the parameters you are using? ...
#crysx
This is a deviation from the Stratum specification and should be fixed poolside - diff changes are to be enforced on the next work message sent where the cleanjobs parameter is true.
Pools don't always follow protocol.
Then they can get fucked.
hehehe ... that fixes that ...
...#crysx
Well, hardly a point in having standards and protocols if a big pool will just decide to blow them off and become incompatible with miners - this is what the protocol is designed to prevent. I honestly think we need a new protocol, but working with what we have now is a must for interoperability.
totally agree wolf ...
i come from a corporate background - and let me tell you - THOSE guys dont move unless its completely and absolutely IN LINE with their 'protocols' ...
the unfortunate thing is - that there are absolutely no restrictions ( on pools or miners alike ) that bar any deviation from the 'standards' that are required for full interoperability between pools and miners ...
#crysx
wich algos are you mining?
İ have some problems with realese 50, cc miner crashes and many rejects. Realese 48 still best for my rigs..
@crysx its good to know that pools are aware of the problem & working on it.
I am now done donating to sp_, once again thanks so much man.
For next 24 hours i will be mining for http://fullnode.co
Feel free to donate to them.
Regards
Sam
I am now done donating to sp_, once again thanks so much man.
For next 24 hours i will be mining for http://fullnode.co
Feel free to donate to them.
Regards
Sam
never knew this group existed ... will have a look at it now ...
tanx mate ...
#crysx
Thanks for your donation.
@crysx its good to know that pools are aware of the problem & working on it.
I am now done donating to sp_, once again thanks so much man.
For next 24 hours i will be mining for http://fullnode.co
Feel free to donate to them.
Regards
Sam
I am now done donating to sp_, once again thanks so much man.
For next 24 hours i will be mining for http://fullnode.co
Feel free to donate to them.
Regards
Sam
Joes
A NVIDIA gtx 970 should be around 100% faster than a AMD 280x when mining nist5
opensource ccminer(sp-mod release 50) vs opensource sgminer(5.1.1).
updating!
There was a bug in the hashrate NIST5 in some of the .4x versions. But It is fixed in release 50.
Nist5 haven't been profitable for a long time, but now new coins have made this algo very profitable on NVIDIA with the latest SP-mod.
Great newsNist5 haven't been profitable for a long time, but now new coins have made this algo very profitable on NVIDIA with the latest SP-mod.
A NVIDIA gtx 970 should be around 100% faster than a AMD 280x when mining nist5
opensource ccminer(sp-mod release 50) vs opensource sgminer(5.1.1).
updating!
btw - fyi sp ...
when the miners are going through another pool - like the farm at the moment through minsty - once you point the workers to yaamp or westhash / nicehash - ALL the hash disappears on the pools your are targeting ( ie - yaamp and westhash show NO hashrate ) BUT the miner shows accepted shares with almost NO rejects ...
strange ...
#crysx
when the miners are going through another pool - like the farm at the moment through minsty - once you point the workers to yaamp or westhash / nicehash - ALL the hash disappears on the pools your are targeting ( ie - yaamp and westhash show NO hashrate ) BUT the miner shows accepted shares with almost NO rejects ...
strange ...
#crysx
This is a deviation from the Stratum specification and should be fixed poolside - diff changes are to be enforced on the next work message sent where the cleanjobs parameter is true.
Pools don't always follow protocol.
Then they can get fucked.
hehehe ... that fixes that ...
...#crysx
@ bensam1231 In your bat file... if westhash goes down then nicehash takes over... but if nicehash then goes down does it go back to westhash? thx
ccminer.exe -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://stratum.westhash.com:3345 -u -p x -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3345 -u -p x
ccminer.exe -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://stratum.westhash.com:3345 -u -p x -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3345 -u -p x
Yes, it's failover. When westhash comes back up it should switch back to it, unless failover in ccminer is different from sgminer.
i thought ccminer had no form of failover bensam? ...
in fact - ive tested your setup - and it seems ccminer only picks up the second pool that you input and mines there only ...
sgminer has failover builtin ... we have both running in the farm - and only sgminer drops to failover when the pool drops ...
miner control or other packages ( all windows which we cant use here due to linux - as far as i know anyway ) are the ones that do that 'for' ccminer ...
would be nice if it was built in ...
#crysx
You didn't notice that till other people pointed it out, good catch on that one after the fact bro. Quit being a douche and move on already. I let you get the last word in and you went out of your way to do this again. You don't want to ruin the thread, don't start shit.
Me not responding to your earlier 'spiel' and then you going 'oh I'm good enough to not say anything else' right after you did was not you winning. It was me being the respectable person and setting things down and moving on, because I actually care if this devolves into a two-three page long bitch fest. Don't assume a lack of a response is submission, rather restraint and self control. Exactly what you were preaching, but couldn't practice.
In the batchfile I gave I had MM pools in front of the westhash pool and it fell over to the westhash pool, I didn't check to see if it picked up the MM pools after they cameback up. As per other people, apparently it wont swap back to other pools when they come up (although one person said it does on occasion). As I said I thought it was the same as sgminer, but it might be different.
bensam ... i wake up and go through each post as i read them ... then i post ... i dont read the WHOLE thread then go back ... too much time wasted ...
douchebag? ... well - i certainly dont go out of my way to do anything of the like to become something like that ...
i realized after reading the rest that i had posted a little too early ...
my mistake bensam - i didnt mean to offend you ...
it was more constructive that it was an attack - as you so clearly took it ... so once again - my apologies ...
im not here to attck anyone - just to be as constructive as i can ...
you're aggression is uncalled for and certainly not welcome - but i wont take offense ...
ill put my tail between my legs and take it on the chin ... there is no opposition on my part - nor am i trying to provoke ...
as for you 'letting' me get the 'last word' in - geez tanx ... im appreciative of that ... :|
it really DOES show how 'respectable' you really are ... nice one ...
stop thinking that im against you and that im just spilling my 'shit' here - and instead work with me as well as the rest of the community to sort things ... and stop the aggression bensam ...
im no genius - but it does not take one to work things out with the whole communities input ... SHEESH! ...
in any case ( and more to the point ) - ccminer does not have anything built in - its been conversed many times over previously and in other threads ... it would be nice if it did like sgminer - but its not built that way ... maybe one day some dev will extend it to that ...
apparently a batch file in windows consistently crashes on exit also - but that is of no real consequence IF the rotational batch works ..
im looking for a working batch ( working by means of others opinions and experience here - i dont use windows ) - because i remember in one of the threads that someone had a WORKING version of the batch for windows ...
minercontrol seems to be the one app that is always brought up ... maybe time to test with windows on a couple of machines on the farm and see ...
sp - would it be that hard to add a --failover or --load-balance ( like in sgminer ) option to your ( sp-mod) fork? ...
#crysx
Fellas...fellows..FELLAS!!! Wow,.... Gentlemen! Everyone...OFF the high horse and down to biz. Stop the 'bitch-fest' and let's try to find a solution. Can we? So far, and no complaints about previous attempts, a solution has NOT been found. We all are aware of that. A once in a while, isn't a fix. Heads together...let's find a way!
Thank You
well aware of that mate ... and really - my history here would show you that im not about slanging matches ... just couldnt keep my big mouth shut this time ...
so all is good on my end ...
ill setup a few machines that are windows when i can find the time ... probably next week - to play around with the switching issue ...
linux is in the same boat - but skunks / scryptr's script look very promising in this area ...
tanx ...
#crysx
Jump to: