Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1123. (Read 2347601 times)

tanx antonio - appreciate that ... but they ( the servers and worker machines in the farm ) are linux systems ( fedora 19 x64 for the workers and scientific linux ( rhel based ) for the servers ) so ssh console is all i need with them ...

for some reason - the internet link that i have for the farm was down - and the internet link for the servers was down also ... hence why i couldnt log in to either ...

when the farm link is down - they have a failover / fall back with the second internet link - as the farm is a subset of the network ...

it doesnt need any other software apart from ssh - which is stock standard with all linux distros ... the home machine is a windows ( yup - the only one ) machine as i need it to test and support with from here ... its THIS home machine that needs an app - and 'putty' does just fine to log in via ssh ... when i need anything else - like an x-server on here within windows - i just run cygwin ... ...

anyway - it seems as the dual-broadband router might be at fault here ... had it for years and its served the network VERY well ... linksys ( now owned by cisco ) rv082 - the earlier version ...

will have to buy ( ebay ) a new one soon i think ...

in any case ... have changed the systems over now to v46 x11 and one testing on quark ...

quark ... -g 3 -i 22 is still rocky and unstable ... no chance x11 is working with -g parameter for some reason - only have it running intensity -i 20.5 ...

restesting quark on the small machine without any parameters initially then with intensity settings ... might start at -i 22 with -g and work my way up from there ...

#crysx

Yeah, when I start quark mining with -g my speed is less (28M for 2x970), compared to 31M when starting without any settings (only -r and -R). release 46

Run it without launchparameters. The -g parameter still needs some work..

-g 2,2,2,1 is not supported.
-g 2 will create 2 threads on every gpu in the rig.
The -d parameter with the -g should be supported, but there might be issues.

With the -g parameter, only quark and x11,x13,x15,x17 is working.
whirlpoolx, skein, qubit etc will give "does not validate errors".

So run without any launch parameter. Boost in most algos.

All my rigs have been running release 46 stable for 6 hours now (no launch parameters). The boost on the pool is significant

if you are using -g WITH x11 ... then you will still get issues ... we still do also ...

-g parameter works well with quark - but find that there are major issues with x11 ...

-i parameter on x11 works very well - you just got to find the max that you can push the intensity of your cards ...

our gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards can be pushed to -i 20.5 stable ... -i 20.6 still runs but not so stable ... anything more than -i 20.6 and ccminer crashes ...

we will be testing v46 with quark ( and various settings ) later today on westhash ... then possibly on yaamp ...

#crysx

Hi all, for myself : 1.5.46 sp

does not validate on cpu still there.
-g 1,2,3,4 don't seem to work with gtx970X2 (maybe i do the wrong thing (not in sli))
i get better performence without -i (approx 8000 khash/s each)

ccminer -o stratum+tcp://us-east.multipool.us:11111 -p x -u xxx.xxx

At least, thanks everything work without those parameter and i get decent hash on x11 !!

stock clocks?

Yea everything without the -i is giving a decent boost, at least on quark. GTX 980 was first doing 17,900 kh/s - 18,200 kh/s, now it's like 19,200 kh/s - 19,280 kh/s.

Didn't tried many settings yet, it's with default settings, single threat and without intensity,It's almost morning in my city ))). Need to sleep )) Tomorrow will try with g and i parameter.

chrysophylax,

You need to get some remote program on those rigs to work from home also.

Pretty sure -g not working when using -d.

waking up not too long ago and reading back on all this has now got us into overdrive ...

heading to the office and testing the latest build in the next few hours ...

will update here soon guys ...

what is the 'best' commandline paramters for the 750ti oc lp? ...

-g 3 -i 22 ? ... or just run single threaded? ...

#crysx

with what settings? ...

#crysx

Sure,soon i'll donate again ))). 5*750Ti 32050  from the wall 395W with amd underclock apu cpu ))) .. i have another 15 280x but they are so bad in quark )) or i don't know latest kernels )))) At this time i changed all my rigs to x13 ENC and BT x11 ...fresh coins and and for now great earnings )).

1000 ACCEPTS BUILD 730--

After at least 1000 accepts on both rigs, (1000/1005, 6x750ti FTW, 99.5% and 10053/1055, 99.81% 2x970 FTW+), and more than 4 hours, I am going to upgrade to v46 on all cards.  Currently, my rigs are under reported at 66.7Mh/s at the pool, but have been over reported in the recent past.  Poolside rates flucuate.

I am going to upgrade to the release version, v46.       --scryptr

You're on Linux, correct?

And those cards in same machine?

my 5x 750ti + 1x 280x rig went from 41.5 MHASH to 44.5MHASH (standard clocks, no overclock)

520 watt in the wall. Msi gaming z97 motherboard/ celeron cpu/

Time to donate some satoshis to the developers ?

More free hash is comming..

Defaults are set to -i 23 for compute 5.2 devices(960,970,980..)
and -i 22 for compute 5.0 devices(750,750ti..)

23 was faster on my testrig on the 750ti, but it crashed after some hours.

GTX 960 SSC--

The 960 card in my Win 7 x64 system is running at 9.98Mh/s with Windows release v46.  It is running single-threaded, with "-i 23.7".  It ran at 9.9Mh/s with no "-i" parameter set, default intensity, when I first started it with v46.  Many times thread hash reports are just over 10Mh/s.  Accepts are at 9.98Mh/s.  This is about 500kh/s better than prior best results with v44 and v45.

      --scryptr

Without any parameter 5*750Ti rig QUARK 30600 increase to 32050.