linearIntensity 512.
I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
good one 
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1157. (Read 2347599 times)
good one 
linearIntensity 512.
I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
What is your launchconfig? My 7950 can do around 4MHASH@qubit with -i 20 and -w 256.
You were right! I missed it! Now my own build is doing well, 4378khs in Qubit
Pretty good for 512 cores.. (The GTX 750 Maxwell 1gb card retails for around $120)
A AMD radeon 280x R9 does 5,5MHASH with 2048 cores. (optimized opensource miner with 5 times the power usage).
What is this "optimized" miner you're talking about? This number is very odd as R7750 can push out >2000khs with ported kernels. 
sent to your btc wallet ...
transaction id - ab9cf607a4983fdf9cfa83d76f6e9e3877dcac6ed2f72068e921aa588123f02c-000 - on its way of 0.1btc ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx
transaction id - ab9cf607a4983fdf9cfa83d76f6e9e3877dcac6ed2f72068e921aa588123f02c-000 - on its way of 0.1btc ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx
I have sendt version 6 of the spreadcoin miner to the donators. With sourcecode this time.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
sp - how much do i send you for the files? ...
edit - just read back and found it - 0.1btc ...
sending now mate ...
tanx again ...
#crysx
I have sendt version 6 of the spreadcoin miner to the donators. With sourcecode this time.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
Yes, the next release of the spreadcoinminer will be with sourcecode. It will still be private for a while
if anyone doesn't publish it.
if anyone doesn't publish it.
that would be good sp ...
I think that ive missed the boat in the optimization stakes with spreadx11 anyway - BUT I appreciate that the miner will be released so I can compile it directly ...
will it be incorporated into the current ccminer fork? ...
and as far as the cryptonight optimization is concerned - is that part of the process? ... as I am quite eager to compile these optimizations as readily as you have them available ...
#crysx
Looks like the 12% increase in whirlpool can get faster. The current implementation gives bankconflicts in shared mem access. I need to duplicate the tables,. Then I need to add my bfins adress hack to make the table lockup run in 2 instructions instead of 4
Will be interesting to see if it beats Wolf0's SBox+Bitslice
Wirlpoolx is currently running at around 210MHASH on the gtx 980
Will be interesting to see if it beats Wolf0's SBox+Bitslice
Wirlpoolx is currently running at around 210MHASH on the gtx 980
Yes, the next release of the spreadcoinminer will be with sourcecode. It will still be private for a while
if anyone doesn't publish it.
if anyone doesn't publish it.
I will start to improve the CryptoNight Hashrate in a private kernal.
For 0.2 BTC donation you can get the improved hash .
The spreadcoin donators will get a discount of 0.1BTC.
New donators will get the improved spreadcoin miner for free.
For 0.2 BTC donation you can get the improved hash .
The spreadcoin donators will get a discount of 0.1BTC.
New donators will get the improved spreadcoin miner for free.
does this mean we will finally get a linux edition? ...
been waiting for it and now spreadcoin has fallen flat sp ... im quite disappointed ...
will you at least release BOTH windows AND linux versions ... that would be ideal ...
i would have donated so much more if linux was included here mate ... at least a compiled WORKING version or source that i could have compiled ...
instead i sit here and watch ...
but still donate - purely because your an awesome dev
...but would really like to be included in all these updates via a linux build ...
either that - or tell me what it would cost to have the source to build it myself ...
#crysx
commit Faster fugue https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/2ab3254cbddedc0a34020fb3b5d7917fca87dc01 was a little bit (5-7khs) slower for my gtx750 even with manually fine tuned -i.
I have corrected the launch parameters now. Should run faster with the latest checkins.
I will start to improve the CryptoNight Hashrate in a private kernal.
For 0.2 BTC donation you can get the improved hash .
The spreadcoin donators will get a discount of 0.1BTC.
New donators will get the improved spreadcoin miner for free.
For 0.2 BTC donation you can get the improved hash .
The spreadcoin donators will get a discount of 0.1BTC.
New donators will get the improved spreadcoin miner for free.
shavite is used in qubit did you include this change?
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/af409c1da57085ad942b3de05d1e33f730d6b910
Also make sure that you compile with the latest drivers.
You were right! I missed it! Now my own build is doing well, 4378khs in Qubithttps://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/af409c1da57085ad942b3de05d1e33f730d6b910
Also make sure that you compile with the latest drivers.
Pretty good for 512 cores.. (The GTX 750 Maxwell 1gb card retails for around $120)
A AMD radeon 280x R9 does 5,5MHASH with 2048 cores. (optimized opensource miner with 5 times the power usage).
Wolf, how fast can you make qubit?
shavite is used in qubit did you include this change?
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/af409c1da57085ad942b3de05d1e33f730d6b910
Also make sure that you compile with the latest drivers.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/af409c1da57085ad942b3de05d1e33f730d6b910
Also make sure that you compile with the latest drivers.
You were right! I missed it! Now my own build is doing well, 4378khs in Qubit
There are 3 commits to the fugue hash between 39 and 40. did you forget these?
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/cfb07f6488f436caae14fcd179933ae74efa6a65
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/c60096da2401173051c11fe3a864aee2b2f5d7ad
No I didn't. These 2 commits are in my build.
And the last https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/2ab3254cbddedc0a34020fb3b5d7917fca87dc01 is certainly not so good on my 750 so I've got rid of it
damn, I can't understand why your R40 binary is 20khs faster in Qubit then my custom R39 based built.
Your R40 didn't work on GTX750 1gb on default (out of memory error) so I use it with "-i 19.3" option.
And it is 20khs faster then both your own built R39 binary and my custom build.
As I see on GitHub there were no changes in Qubit between R39 and R40 except for different launch config that is overridden by -i option.
Your R40 didn't work on GTX750 1gb on default (out of memory error) so I use it with "-i 19.3" option.
And it is 20khs faster then both your own built R39 binary and my custom build.
As I see on GitHub there were no changes in Qubit between R39 and R40 except for different launch config that is overridden by -i option.
shavite is used in qubit did you include this change?
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/af409c1da57085ad942b3de05d1e33f730d6b910
Also make sure that you compile with the latest drivers.
commit Faster fugue https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/2ab3254cbddedc0a34020fb3b5d7917fca87dc01 was a little bit (5-7khs) slower for my gtx750 even with manually fine tuned -i.
But commit faster whirlpool https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/9715bf7eea8f1c92034e1c67891fa242a8c63d26 is faster for x15.
So i just added x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu from Release 40 to my custom build and gain optimal performance: +17khs on x15 without drop in x13 and x14
But commit faster whirlpool https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/9715bf7eea8f1c92034e1c67891fa242a8c63d26 is faster for x15.
So i just added x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu from Release 40 to my custom build and gain optimal performance: +17khs on x15 without drop in x13 and x14
There are 3 commits to the fugue hash between 39 and 40. did you forget these?
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/cfb07f6488f436caae14fcd179933ae74efa6a65
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/c60096da2401173051c11fe3a864aee2b2f5d7ad
damn, I can't understand why your R40 binary is 20khs faster in Qubit then my custom R39 based built.
Your R40 didn't work on GTX750 1gb on default (out of memory error) so I use it with "-i 19.3" option.
And it is 20khs faster then both your own built R39 binary and my custom build.
As I see on GitHub there were no changes in Qubit between R39 and R40 except for different launch config that is overridden by -i option.
Your R40 didn't work on GTX750 1gb on default (out of memory error) so I use it with "-i 19.3" option.
And it is 20khs faster then both your own built R39 binary and my custom build.
As I see on GitHub there were no changes in Qubit between R39 and R40 except for different launch config that is overridden by -i option.
commit Faster fugue https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/2ab3254cbddedc0a34020fb3b5d7917fca87dc01 was a little bit (5-7khs) slower for my gtx750 even with manually fine tuned -i.
But commit faster whirlpool https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/9715bf7eea8f1c92034e1c67891fa242a8c63d26 is faster for x15.
So i just added x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu from Release 40 to my custom build and gain optimal performance: +17khs on x15 without drop in x13 and x14
But commit faster whirlpool https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/9715bf7eea8f1c92034e1c67891fa242a8c63d26 is faster for x15.
So i just added x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.cu from Release 40 to my custom build and gain optimal performance: +17khs on x15 without drop in x13 and x14
Jump to: