the problem is that the throughput is set to be fast on the 980 in the source version. download the 1.4.9 source and replace the file:
cuda_x11_echo.cu from my fork
you should get a small boost in x11. On quark I have optimized bmw and blake a tinybit
1.4.9 with the intesity parameter is found here:
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1226. (Read 2347588 times)
On windows, ccminer runs faster when compiled for x86
i get less hash on x11 750ti and no improvement on quark. EDIT: I should say no improvement on x11
On windows, ccminer runs faster when compiled for x86
i get less hash on x11 750ti and no improvement on quark. On windows, ccminer runs faster when compiled for x86
i get less hash on x11 750ti and no improvement on quark. EDIT: I should say no improvement on x11
On windows, ccminer runs faster when compiled for x86
You need to install the latest cuda 6.5 and visual studio 2013.
i got it thank you djm34 and sp and all yes curl was build into it.. it was open zip to folder then sln..opens vs 2013 automatically then 64x release and done...3 minutes 
You need to install the latest cuda 6.5 and visual studio 2013.
still very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the authorYou know that you haven't anything to do (as epsilon told you... since libcurl has been put into the compat)
still very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the author
I should probobly merge the latest changes in the main branch. (1.4.9) but I'm too lazy. My focus is on the kernals, and not the rest.
The work on the echo is not done. There is more to remove.
The work on the echo is not done. There is more to remove.
I almost didnt changed the .cu files recently, you can maybe refork my project
still very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the authorstill very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the authorstill very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the author still very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
from the site of the author
still very new at compiling, where can i get curl to 7.38.0 windows 8.1 from a safe site please.
you have to wait a bit longer, I have some problems with some of the mods. But I checked in +20KHASH @750ti by rewriting ECHO hash. Precalced some more and removed some calculations.
you can compile and check if you like.
The source is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I should probobly merge the latest changes in the main branch. (1.4.9) but I'm too lazy. My focus is on the kernals, and not the rest.
The work on the echo is not done. There is more to remove.
you can compile and check if you like.
The source is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I should probobly merge the latest changes in the main branch. (1.4.9) but I'm too lazy. My focus is on the kernals, and not the rest.
The work on the echo is not done. There is more to remove.
My next commit will give much hash.
Can't wait!
X11 10MH/s@980 on the way
indeed, so i need to add that to the stats
something interesting : http://epsy.linuxd.org/ccminer/sample.htm
Both are working on the same pool, first is windows with a MSI, second (epsytour) is linux with also the same MSI and a gigabyte black edition (both cards are reporting higher hashrate).
Check the Shares/minutes and accepted count... almost the same :/
Both are working on the same pool, first is windows with a MSI, second (epsytour) is linux with also the same MSI and a gigabyte black edition (both cards are reporting higher hashrate).
Check the Shares/minutes and accepted count... almost the same :/
That would be how vardiff works, higher hash rate leads to higher difficulty to hit the pool's configured share rate target. Or am I missing the point?
something interesting : http://epsy.linuxd.org/ccminer/sample.htm
Both are working on the same pool, first is windows with a MSI, second (epsytour) is linux with also the same MSI and a gigabyte black edition (both cards are reporting higher hashrate).
Check the Shares/minutes and accepted count... almost the same :/
Both are working on the same pool, first is windows with a MSI, second (epsytour) is linux with also the same MSI and a gigabyte black edition (both cards are reporting higher hashrate).
Check the Shares/minutes and accepted count... almost the same :/
Jump to: