Workable intensity in #4 is -i 22, higher then that causes random crashing even at stock clocks and highest TDPs.
All my rigs use the default intensities without crashing. (windows 8/7 32gb virtual memory)
Could it be a windows 10 issue?
Almost all my rigs are W8, I haven't updated them nor had a reason to. W8 used to get better hashrate then W10 in some specific algos, not so much anymore, but I'm not going to take the time to update them if there is no reason.
I have EVGA, Gigabyte, Asus, Zotac, PNY, and MSI. The MSI cards are overvolted from the factory so they almost never crash (and use more voltage). The EVGA cards seem to have the most problems dealing with bitcore and the higher intensities. Although it seemed as though randomly machines would crash even if stable for a few days.
Like I mentioned it has to do with the clocks fluctuating up and down. Bitcore is the only algo that does this. This means the card doesn't have time to settle on a lower clock and voltage that is completely stable as Nvidia BOOST applies more voltage at higher clocks and steps back when it's not stable. However, since the GPU load flucatuates so much it never has time to reach a completely stable clockrate (even at stock). This will vary between manufacturers and even between different models in the same product line (like 1070). They use different voltage/clock ramps.
A way around this is if you could find a way to maintain a static workload on the GPUs which would have little variance when cycling between the algos (10 if I remember right) in bitcore.
What's the reason for me to do that? To mine your devfee?
)
To increase your profit. Do you want a 35MHASH bitcore miner? Or do you want a 31MHASH bitcore miner?
The point is that #4 is faster, but it use more power and you need to run with the correct launch configuration.
The point is that it could be faster if you burn your card.
You have no idea what you're talking about, punctuated by 'burning your card'. TDP is what you're looking for if you want to reduce the load on the cards, not intensity. That's independent of intensity. There is nothing wrong with miners that use more power. If you don't like it, you reduce your TDP. That's your choice.
Intensities between #2 and #3/4 for Bitcore SP is indeed different and not because he's just increasing the intensity. Workable intensity in #4 is -i 22, higher then that causes random crashing even at stock clocks and highest TDPs.
The net difference between #2 and #4 is about 7%, minus a 2% devfee. So it's about 5% faster at stable intensities.
No it doesn't have anything to do with power delivery, I've mined on more demanding algos, such as Nexus and SIB. It has something to do with the fluctuating GPU loads (probably due to the algo) that causes your gpu clock thrashing So depending on how well your card is factory OC'd it can indeed crash on the default intensity with your miner SP. I have enough cards to know certain models will crash and some wont at those intensities. No matter what you adjust the clocks to unless you underclock, they will crash.
Open afterburner and watch the stats. That's also why the hashrate goes up and down as it cycles through the algos.
Bitcore when it was first implemented was a band aid fix in order to get it up and running, I don't think it really ever got past that point. There was a LOT of initial crashing when the algo was first implemented.
I definetly have idea.
What I have with sp4.
With 1080 and OC that I mentioned above. SP4 crashes with i22+. It is more or less stable at i20. But at that intencity it gives less result than sp2. 22 vs 24
1080ti with sp4 makes 30-30.5 on i25 vs 29-29.5 with sp2 on i20. Same OC settings.
1070 sp4 18.5-18.8 -i20 vs 18.8-19.5 sp2 i20
So it is clear that on the same intensity sp4 is worse than sp2. You can get extra 3-4% by rising intensity but loose at least the same by devfee.
That's because 5min devfee is taken first, so after every crash or change you will actually loose much more. As always liar sp_ is calling it 2% devfee while it is not.
Something is holding your cards back then, i 20 on #2 will give around 19.3 and i 22 will give around 20.6 give or take on #4. My cards are OC'd although the clocks are all over the place on this algo so it's tough to compare that. Roughly 1900mhz and they all run at the highest TDPs available to the cards.
It's a 2% fee, I said earlier it wasn't as I thought it was based off of a hour, it's not.