It is cute how you slap random things together. That phrase refers to repetition and eventually being right, Gary hasn't displayed any of that. You also literally just rewrote what I just said about Gary .
And yes, you just use people to try and forward your position. You make it seem like there are two options there, either supporting Gary or disagreeing him. A falso dichotomy. You could've simply said nothing, but instead you chose to use someone you don't even agree with to try and stick it to someone else in order to make your own position look stronger.
Original indeed.
Why are you so obsessed with me?
You can't be seriously that stupid where you responded to a post that wasn't even about you? lol... Has to be trolling, there is no other way.
You can't be seriously that stupid to say your post wasn't about me yet you mentioned my name 3 times? Once OK, it's cool, twice you got me ticklish, but thrice, thrice I get summoned!
Who was I responding to dude? You're trying really hard to wriggle out of this when you simply glanced over the post you thought it was a response to you because you saw your name, when it wasn't. The post wasn't about you, it was about another person using you and talking to them.
Surface processing verse reader comprehension. I know it's tough, but it completely fits your MO, just like all your other posts where you assume because someone talks out their ass you think they're a developer. You don't spend any time actually reading and just come up with the first knee jerk response you can, typical of kids today. Now you're just trying to save face, which isn't working because we both know the post wasn't about you.
Keccak and skein (and blake) are good for FPGA, don't be surprised if the profit for GPU drops quickly.
A good FPGA programmer can do the miner in some days. It will be 5 time more efficient than GPU, or more.
could you give us some links to Support that Claim?
last time i read about fpga there werent even worth considering, would have more luck with usb stick ascis
I do chip design for them personally. Consider his statement verified.
Would said FPGAs be a commercial venture or just for in-house use?
He occasionally produces code, but there is no commercial venture because either it's too buggy to do or he doesn't actually have a working program. If he did, he would have warehouses full of them, but he doesn't, so he can't. It's just like Chryo talking about how he's going to conquer the universe, but he still has to stop back in here to remind us of his existence, much like Wolf0.
Actions speak louder then words. Everyone, especially online, likes to beat their chest to make what they do seem bigger then it really is.
As far as what Pallas said, some algorithms are easier to paralyze (parallel?) and fit better inside small footprints (that also depends on the kind of FPGA). Also notice where Wolf0 just said "Believe me I'm a developer" and Pallas actually attempted to talk about it a bit. You can't inherit credibility either.
Also chip design (designing ASICs from the ground up) != programming a FPGA.
Also segued the actual question.
