Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 228. (Read 2347601 times)

Is it possible for you to put down in about three or four sentences , the basic workflow of a generic mining program. Not the Super basic version, but maybe a couple of sentences that concentrate on how the hashing is performed, checked versus the blockchain, and then moved on to the next block.

solo mining is subject of probability and uncertainty. For SPR my rig sometimes does few blocks within 1 hour! But sometimes it takes much longer than expected.

I so far have got only one block within a day for 1444mhs:( . I gave up.

Agree !
You mine on suprnova ?

Agree !
You mine on suprnova ?

Bullshit.

The speed and shares on tpruvot is working on my end on miner and pool..

Another  copy paste job from Tpruvot. With the same error in the hashrate as krlx. 20% is lost on the pool.
The free palgin mod or the donation miner (sp-mod) is working at full speed.

Yes. Espylons version seems to work bether.

is the krnlx  miner the same as epsylon miner? why you are talking about that sp? he clearly said "and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code"...

what's the best config for
1.gtx 1070 = power / core / mem
2.gtx 1060 = power / core / mem

thanks sp_

is the krnlx  miner the same as epsylon mienr? why you are talking about that sp?

I'm getting more shares with tpruvot's 2.2 than I do with your mod 7.  About 14 coins per hour with my 300MH/s rate with mod 7, and i'm getting 18 coins per hour with tpruvot 2.2.  reported hashrate can say whatever, but actual results don't lie.

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

Another  copy paste job from Tpruvot. With the same error in the hashrate as krlx. 20% is lost on the pool.
The free palgin mod or the donation miner (sp-mod) is working at full speed.