Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 243. (Read 2347601 times)

sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 251
Hi Guys,

How much did you get with SP skunk version on 1080 not TI ?!

Thx in advance.

52.5 1080 TI
40 1080
29.5 1070
18 1060

DL latest driver, run 100% TDP +100 Core, -502 Mem, 64 bit miner for 1080/TI

New open source miner slightly faster for 1080 line, slower/similar for 1070/1060
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
If you want to know some ccminer history github is a nice place to check.

Here is a commit back in nov 2014: (faster echo512)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/3cc7e9db091b277d9357b20f2d9101846bee54dc

Here is another commit Jan 2015 (Faster groestl512)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/1c61d0eebb1ee49bcdb137d5c7291fc0fb3e810d

Every algo have been optimized by me, and I have done it opensource.

If you see the latest alexis fork, he base his work on the same code.

So I did the work, Eplyson copied my work, and Alexis reforked my work. And then They bitch about it when I add some more speed and refuse to share my changes..Huh

You really tried to go there.

Name one algo that you have released before Epsy or any other Nvidia dev has?

I'll be waiting for that answer.

You release nothing. You copy every algo that Epsy has released that you put in "your" miner.

EVERYONE here needs to wake up and realize the day Epsy stops releasing algo's then this ccminer is done.

Everyone who donates to sp has a backward thought process. The real person who should be getting donations is Epsy for his work in releasing the algo's and code for sp to take and claim as his own.

Here is a question to EVERYONE who has been donating to sp ASK HIM FOR THE SOURCE and he must provide it per the License.

So everyone mining algo's - skunk, dnr and timetravel10 you should really be donating to Epsy for giving you the opportunity to mine it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19977610  What was wrong. You could not release it yourself?
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Hi Guys,

How much did you get with SP skunk version on 1080 not TI ?!

Thx in advance.
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 251
New Signatum miner is slightly faster than this one for 1080 and 1080 TI (~1MH), but slower for1060 and 1070 (1MH)

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8989-new-ccminer-skunk-krnlx-fork-with-faster-skunkhash-performance/

Hopefully we get another update!
full member
Activity: 839
Merit: 100
Someone here mine wth the optimised cryptonite miner ?
Any feedback on hashrate with it ?
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
hi sp_....Pm...thank
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
World record?

world record for 1070?


                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 378.49
CPU:0.23%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [18:09:51]
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 43458.8            | Block:      30051 |
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 23.2042                    |
Solved: 25.4615iff:      0.0 | Shares: 48.75   | Rej: 2.01005% | Speed:   33.27M
0.MSI GTX 1070               : Shares: 48.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   33.36MH/s|


https://i.gyazo.com/93044ac6ff2ea254512746a647cb1b67.png
full member
Activity: 247
Merit: 100
Spreadminer_11 still faster on 382.53, then Spreadminer_13 on 384.94.
Using 4 x GTX1060: 75% TDP (90W), +150 core, -502 memory.
SPR_11: 21,85 Mhs
SPR_13: 21,35 MHs
 
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
@bensam1231

You can even get 31.2 Mh/s at 70% TDP and +650 Mem using 110 watts with GTX 1070. No AMD card can beat that price to performance on ETH.
We're comparing AMD to Nvidia so the 1080 Ti is included. No AMD card can beat the performance of the 1080 Ti on equihash.
So yes, Nvidia does have the best gpus for now. Seriously pointless in even replying, blabber all you want, the numbers don't lie.

Let's be honest here.  I was hitting 29+ MH/s on Ethereum @ around 65 watts with my RX480 (with a modded 580 bios) card which I picked up initially for $230.  On Ethereum, it wiped the floor with anything NVidia while running ETHash, however, it wasn't even close for equihash.  The 1070's which were $349 each were well over 400 SOL/s and definitely the better bang for the buck on any protocol other than ETHash at that time.  The AMD card was even faster than my 1080ti on ETHash $ for $ and watt for watt, switch to any other protocol and the NVidia card ruled the roost.

Today, because the price of the RX cards remains insane, the obvious winner is NVidia and when considering price, power, and space - today the 1080ti wins by a very slight margin, followed closely by the 1070.  However, if these cards were selling at MSRP, AMD would be in the lead.

That's the honest truth. Mind you, this is coming from someone with 1 RX480, 8 GTX 1070's, and 2 GTX 1080ti's.... so you can clearly see what an AMD fanboy I am.

M
full member
Activity: 839
Merit: 100
Do you have a link for the best cryptonite Nvidia miner ?
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
@bensam1231

You can even get 31.2 Mh/s at 70% TDP and +650 Mem using 110 watts with GTX 1070. No AMD card can beat that price to performance on ETH.
We're comparing AMD to Nvidia so the 1080 Ti is included. No AMD card can beat the performance of the 1080 Ti on equihash.
That not even taking in to account how much more profitable Nvidia becomes with SP mods. So yes, Nvidia does have the best gpus for now.
Seriously pointless for me to even replying, blabber all you want, the numbers don't lie.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10

Wow rude. SP has done great work for us. He has mods with significant improvements for almost every algorithm.
Sigt and Spreadcoin have been the most profitable coins to mine for almost a month now, but hey keep mining your ETH.
Nvidia gpus are still the best, they beat AMD in both the Ethash (32MH/s 1070) and Equihash (740 H/s 1080 Ti) algorithms.
Until we see the performance of RX Vega, Nvidia is still king.

Which miner and pool you using for Spreadcoin.. is it worth it now ?
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
Ok, so for your next rig, what would you choose: Nvidia or AMD?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Higher value cards depreciate more then lower value cards. They don't retain their price better. That's the way halo products work as they aren't a good deal when you buy them and they're even less of a good deal when you're buying them used as there are new products on the market which supersede them for cheaper. Sweet spot is always midrange for new and used from a consumer standpoint.

As far as mining goes, 1080/tis don't scale properly in a lot of algorithms and are crippled in memory hard algos such as Dagger from GDDR5 X. They have heat dissipation issues due to the size of the chips and will throttle a lot faster then a 1060/70 on algos they do work properly on. The size of the heatsinks required to cool them properly are in the three slot variety. They also consume more power which means you need to have a beefier power distribution system for each computer, which gets even more expensive the bigger the PSU.

Did I mention they can't really mine dagger? That's a pretty big deal. It wouldn't surprise me if we're back dual mining Eth again on Nvidia hardware. That already happened earlier this year. Also why AMD hardware is just outright better as far as investment goes for mining (if we could get it remotely around MSRP). For comparison a 580 is making $2.51 dual mining and a 1070 is making $2.35 mining Zcash. Actually looking at prices right now, you can get 580s for $350... So it still is a better deal. As hardware values come down from their bloated levels it'll become a even better deal.

It blows my mind people still can't compare Nvidia and AMD properly. Guess they just see the price tag for a 'mid-low end' card and they can't put it into context when it comes to mining, just playing games.

Other things in the crypto scene being more beneficial to do is outside the scope of buying hardware. We can discuss how much money Claymore is making and the fact he doesn't have competition or that we still don't have the equivalent of Claymore for Nvidia.

LUL AMD cards. With Nvidia you can mine a hole slew of other algorithms that AMD can't. It doesn't even matter if ETH isn't the best to mine.
You mine what's most profitable and convert it to whatever coin you want. SP is our Claymore equivalent for Nvidia. SP is even better than Claymore.
With his mods you have higher profitability than ETH or any of those coin listed on Whattomine.

Just like your picture you're a dumbass. What's the point of mining coins that have 10k in volume? Do you have any idea how fast low volume coins get saturated and destroyed by hashrate? Nvidia hashrate is already bloated, hence why we got all of maybe 3 days of good SIGT mining before that was done. Also why all the 'niche' algos are now equalizing around Equihash algos. Also why people in this thread are now complaining about ROI on their .05BTC investment in the miner. It doesn't matter how many algos you can mine if none of them have the volume to support the hardware mining it.

No shit. I'm the one that started the 'mine what's most profitable, invest in what you want to keep' rhetoric you're spouting after I got tired of people mindlessly mining crap coins as 'supporting the coin'. You can look through this thread to find that. Also in no way, shape, or form related to good hardware purchases or what we're talking about.

SP is not the equivalent of Claymore. He does what's easy and then doesn't give a shit when it gets hard. He doesn't offer improvements outside of basic miner functionality and some speed improvements. That's why a lot of people don't like SP as he only 'optimizes' and nothing else. He doesn't make algos from the ground up either, only if something already exists.

I've supported SP for years, but saying something like that is completely wrong. I understand you came in with the Ethereum boat and you thought Nvidia was a great 'investment', cause it's the underdog, but that would be incorrect. There is a reason like 80% of the hashrate in the GPU Crypto scene is AMD. Mining is all about long term, not short term 'oh I made $2000 in 3 days!' it's about what you make for the other 361 days in the year.
Nvidia is ahead of amd already almost everywhere. Even on eth, AMD began to lose speed, unlike nvidia. amd Soon amd will die.

Ahead 'everywhere', how about some sources for that... Like coins and earnings. Yup, and AMD announced they're fixing it in a driver along with Claymore also working on fixes for the 480/580 hashrate bug. Completely blown out of proportion. You sure know what you're talking about.


Wow rude. SP has done great work for us. He has mods with significant improvements for almost every algorithm.
Sigt and Spreadcoin have been the most profitable coins to mine for almost a month now, but hey keep mining your ETH.
Nvidia gpus are still the best, they beat AMD in both the Ethash (32MH/s 1070) and Equihash (740 H/s 1080 Ti) algorithms.
Until we see the performance of RX Vega, Nvidia is still king.

Rude in what way? I've supported SP for years. I'm happy he increases speed as I've invested a lot of money in Nvidia, but saying he's a Claymore is just completely wrong. Claymore offers professional products with support. SP you don't know if you're going to even get the next version you paid for or he'll add a fee or he wont even release another version or he wont fix bugs. That's completely putting aside that he doesn't work on things he doesn't want to, like features, hence why when another dev bitches about third party code he'll just stop producing whatever product he's working on instead of either making a system that takes into account GPL licensing or rewriting parts of the code he needs to.

Why do you think we're still stuck with a paid version instead of a fee? Because he doesn't spend any amount of time securing his code against people tearing the dev fee out... cause he doesn't want to. A hobby dev is a far cry from a professional that does this for a living, like Claymore.

You're way too new to be lecturing me on how to treat devs. I've donated, I've bought, and I've supported. GTFO if you aren't even going to talk about the original subject matter and instead are turning this into a emotional debate on 'supporting the devs'. Remember we were talking about 1060/70s vs 1080/tis? Then also they're all a bad investment compared to AMD.

Also you aren't getting 32Mhs on a 1070. At +1000 mem which isn't remotely realistic you'll hit about 30Mh. A good solid memory OC for eth will be +500. Also why would you randomly throw a 1080ti in there when you're comparing a 1070? 'Hey look this card gets Y amount of hashrate at X dollars and this card gets Z amount at D dollars'. Good comparison. Lets add in that Nvidia did not get the assembly optimizations for dual mining for Claymore, which means it really doesn't matter what the 'raw' numbers are as any minor worth his salt should be dual mining... And AMD hardware gets about 2x the amount of speed on secondary algos.

Sigt is the flavor of the week. It's dead as Skein is... or as profitable as Equihash. Spreadcoin is semiprofitable, but whenever SP pushes his custom miner that equalizes or dips below Equihash. Niche coins for Nvidia are only as profitable as their obscurity. Hence why I talk about Equihash, because that's a good, solid, long running coin, much like all the breadwinners for AMD. Putting that aside AMD also has it's own niche coins as well. Weird people still don't know how that works. They tell their friends about a niche coin > their friends steal their earnings > their friends tell other friends who also steal their earnings > the coin now makes as much as the lowest common strong supporting algo (Equihash) and it doesn't matter anymore.

Nvidia isn't the king of anything bro, it's pretty easy to see that. That's just your gamer bias talking. If it were, AMD wouldn't be dominating the mining scene both in numbers, but also long term profitability and support. Like I said, it's not about what you earn 3 days out of the year, it's what you earn the other 362.

Oh and nice assuming I'm a AMD miner. I was here far before you and was invested in Nvidia before it became the 'cool thing cause screw AMD'. I'm about 90% Nvidia and 10% AMD right now. Weird that I can maintain perspective on things while being invested in it, no?

member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
Hey all you mining Signatum - Only 85 Minutes left to get those 2500 coin block rewards.  After that, only 1250.
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
He-he, yeah, GPL is a bitch for proprietary products. It was a reason why Apple took FreeBSD for their new OS X. sorry for offtopic.
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/KernelProgramming/BSD/BSD.html
Quote
The BSD portion of the OS X kernel is derived primarily from FreeBSD, a version of 4.4BSD that offers advanced networking, performance, security, and compatibility features.
blame Apple, not me.
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. bla bla bla...
based on your work? lol... your are still the funny reality twisting guy as usual...
https://github.com/alexis78/ccminer => Forked from tpruvot/ccminer

The tpruvot fork is full of my kernel optimalizations, but instead of approving my pullrequests, he copied my work. We have had a paralell opensource fork for years. The tpruvot fork 2.1  has a bether API implementation, more stable stratum code, bether support for the NVSMI, and bugfixes. But slower kernels. I forked version 1.5 and have included some of the fixes.
I should agree with SP_ on that. I'm following and using many forks of ccminers since the start of cryptos and I always saw tpruvot and sp_ "swapping" their patches.
Now, SP_ choose to be closed source (something I could understand when you see Claymore's success and wallets....) but I'm still using open sourced versions for x11,x13,keccak,x15, noescrypt and so on...
If you run his miner, you will see this message :
Quote
  Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
  CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
  Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
He-he, yeah, GPL is a bitch for proprietary products. It was a reason why Apple took FreeBSD for their new OS X. sorry for offtopic.

full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
He-he, yeah, GPL is a bitch for proprietary products. It was a reason why Apple took FreeBSD for their new OS X. sorry for offtopic.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
So I did the work, Eplyson copied my work, and Alexis reforked my work. And then They bitch about it when I add some more speed and refuse to share my changes..Huh

Well, that is because the work is GPL'd, so.. yeah.  That's the whole point of the GPL.  

If you want to fork your own code and take it private, that's fine, but if you base your work on others who do not agree, you have to re-implement their work from scratch or you are infringing their copyright.  Even if it's 1 line of code.

Do I really have to explain how the GPL works to you?

I'm not judging, per se.  Yeah, it's basically unenforceable for most people.  But ethically speaking, it is unethical.  Then you complain that people steal your code and re-sell it, which is something that is both legally and ethically allowed by the GPL.

Maybe you should write your own miner from scratch if you want full ethical control over your code.
Jump to: