I just improved quark on r74. Do you want it?
1.5.74-jdd+
1.5.74-jdd+
What did you do?
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 779. (Read 2347664 times)
What did you do?
I just improved quark on r74. Do you want it?
1.5.74-jdd+
1.5.74-SP
You should have told the truth.
1.5.74-jdd+
Code:
[2016-01-27 19:00:14] accepted: 33/33 (100.00%), 34643 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:00:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 17825
[2016-01-27 19:00:18] accepted: 34/34 (100.00%), 34643 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:00:19] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 17134
[2016-01-27 19:00:19] accepted: 35/35 (100.00%), 34660 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:00:22] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 17085
[2016-01-27 19:00:22] accepted: 36/36 (100.00%), 34673 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:00:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 17114
[2016-01-27 19:00:28] accepted: 37/37 (100.00%), 34686 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:00:29] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 17719
[2016-01-27 19:00:29] accepted: 38/38 (100.00%), 34682 kH/s yes!
1.5.74-SP
Code:
[2016-01-27 19:02:07] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 33334 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:02:08] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 17793
[2016-01-27 19:02:08] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 33486 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:02:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 17146
[2016-01-27 19:02:11] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 33482 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-27 19:02:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 17139
[2016-01-27 19:02:12] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 33478 kH/s yes!
You should have told the truth.
I can make this faster..
1.7.1 in this archive is a typo when he made the folder zip... its yours
i grabbed your kernel changes and cleanup the old ifdef (initial implementation for neos)... didnt had the time/need to focus on blake recently
so my 1.7.2 will be close to you.... cuda 7.5 is better for this algo
i grabbed your kernel changes and cleanup the old ifdef (initial implementation for neos)... didnt had the time/need to focus on blake recently
so my 1.7.2 will be close to you.... cuda 7.5 is better for this algo
I tested again.. same speed. (1.7.2) (ccminer -a blake --benchmark -q)
1.7.1 in this archive is a typo when he made the folder zip... its yours
i grabbed your kernel changes and cleanup the old ifdef (initial implementation for neos)... didnt had the time/need to focus on blake recently
so my 1.7.2 will be close to you.... cuda 7.5 is better for this algo
i grabbed your kernel changes and cleanup the old ifdef (initial implementation for neos)... didnt had the time/need to focus on blake recently
so my 1.7.2 will be close to you.... cuda 7.5 is better for this algo
Yeah xCore modified it last night so we had a faster version with the Vanillacoin fork. I am not sure how he did it.
You meen this version:
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
It is not faster than my opensource..
There are many 750ti cards. with different clocks.
Download release 78 and write
ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark
Then you will see.. I just tested the tvpruvot release and it was slower on all cards.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
Download release 78 and write
ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark
Then you will see.. I just tested the tvpruvot release and it was slower on all cards.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
Yeah xCore modified it last night so we had a faster version with the Vanillacoin fork. I am not sure how he did it.
There are many 750ti cards. with different clocks.
Download release 78 and write
ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark
Then you will see.. I just tested the tvpruvot release and it was slower on all cards.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
Download release 78 and write
ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark
Then you will see.. I just tested the tvpruvot release and it was slower on all cards.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
Maybe for a donate?
I already did +5%
My version does 840MHASH. tvpruvots version does 800MHASH on the 750ti.
here are the changesets:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bd09f337b177ae495dbbff40655338b0d5663792
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/cd7e2b5a91491e468e58fc9a97b390d1eac7d969
Hrmmm- I am getting over 900mh/s on tpruvots versions 750ti, 2.6 gh/s 970, 1.7 gh/s on 960 - modded last night by xCore. I believe he added a file to your version. Was hoping for faster than that!
Than again i am not a programmer so I don't know who's version is who's lol.
Maybe for a donate?
I already did +5%
My version does 840MHASH. tvpruvots version does 800MHASH on the 750ti.
here are the changesets:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bd09f337b177ae495dbbff40655338b0d5663792
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/cd7e2b5a91491e468e58fc9a97b390d1eac7d969
1. Download cuda 7.5
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
Thank you - I will do this tonight...
Maybe for a donate?
1. Download cuda 7.5
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
Thank you - I will do this tonight...
1. Download cuda 7.5
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
2. Download and install visual studio 2013 express
3. Download the source: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
3. Open the project. select release, win32
4. Build.
Thank you - I will do this tonight...
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed.
and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970.
You should mine lyra2v2 and not lyra2.
this is my bat:
Code:
ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.jp.nicehash.com:3347 -u 1AwFc6m5evP5a8csDWsb6S3joSaBx8ia1e -p d=4 -i 16
Replace d=4 with x. and remove the intensity setting.
ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.jp.nicehash.com:3347 -u 1AwFc6m5evP5a8csDWsb6S3joSaBx8ia1e -p x
You should get full hashrate.
Release 78 was compiled with cuda 7.5 and I think it is slower than release 74 but not sure. If you have time, try all releases from 68 and up to 78 and check wich version has the best hashrate for your card.
I also have a private version that improves the speed alot. (from release 74) 4-10% (it cost 0.1 BTC in donation)
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed.
and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970.
Wich version of ccminer are you using?
You should mine lyra2v2 and not lyra2.
i'm using your version. 1.5.78
this is my bat:
Code:
ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.jp.nicehash.com:3347 -u 1AwFc6m5evP5a8csDWsb6S3joSaBx8ia1e -p d=4 -i 16
is 1.5.74 give better hash rate for lyrav2 than 78?
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed.
and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970.
You should mine lyra2v2 and not lyra2.
Download version 74 here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed.
and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970.
Wich version of ccminer are you using?
You should mine lyra2v2 and not lyra2.
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78
ask:
why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed.
and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970.
Perhaps compile the ether miner for 32 bit's will help? Cached Pointersizes will go from 64bit to 32 (and double the tlb limit?) You need to remove the cpu verfication code because it use 64bit libraries I think..
Thought of that but it's going to be troublesome. You only have a 4GB address space, with windows already sucking up ~half. Then you have to load the 1.3 GB DAG from disk, and allocate 1.3GB of GPU RAM (which, AFAIK sits in the same space, although it isn't pinned to host). This doens't fit. So then you would have to read the DAG from disk in small chunks and copy it cover to GPU RAM. And when that's all done, you will have to pass on all solutions to a special light version of ethminer, that does light verification, is it can't load a DAG into RAM for the same reasons. Or you simply don't verify and risk some Boo's.
Then, when that's all done, you're not even sure if it fixes the problem. You could try getting a 32-bit version of dagSimCL to work.
I believe Epsylon3/tpruvot has been trying to get a 32-bit version of ethminer to work a while back. Can't find the source anymore.
Hi Genoil,
This is a small contribution from me to your work on ethminer --- 0xc3e7bda79b60fb4f34fbe467a8c3c3084e9008bbdc9014d8ade8e8c22cd1352a
I am using your miner and making some ETH and I thought that you deserve part of it (as I did with all devs improving the miners we are using).
Keep up the good work!
xCore - ccminer GTX9xx/750 (based on last sp-hash's github): https://talk.vanillacoin.net/uploads/files/tools/ccminer-1.7.1-blake256-standard-uncompressed-sp.zip
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78
Jump to: