CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 846.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: chrysophylax on December 09, 2015, 03:45:58 PM

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 12:04:55 PM

-Now compiled and adjusted for cuda 7.5
-Faster quark on compute 5.2 devices
-Neoscrypt is 50% slower.
-Most algos are slower or same speed.(0-5%)
1.5.75(sp-MOD) is available here: (9-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Please post you hashrates guys.

like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ...
now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ...
ill test today if there is any chance to ...
tanx for new update sp ...
#crysx

I have just tuned a few kernals in quark and x11 (qubit). Lyra2v2, neoscrypt, x13,x14,x15,x17 etc. will be done later. Optimizing for compute 5.0 is hurting 5.2 performance. I should split the kernals and make seperate versions.

New compiler alot of work..

Please donate some beers

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 12:04:55 PM

-Now compiled and adjusted for cuda 7.5
-Faster quark on compute 5.2 devices
-Neoscrypt is 50% slower.
-Most algos are slower or same speed.(0-5%)

1.5.75(sp-MOD) is available here: (9-dec-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Please post you hashrates guys.

like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ...

now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ...

ill test today if there is any chance to ...

tanx for new update sp ...

#crysx

impulse2000

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Algo	75 release	74 release	66 release
Lyra2v2	5060-5100	5167	5218
Quark	7189	7287	7264
Qubit	5530	5450	5448
X11	3513	3498	3498
X13	2645	2745	2745
X15	2285	2361	2377
Neoscrypt	93	210	213
Groestl	9265	8827	8914
Keccak	165000	191000	189965
Bitcoin	240000	233600	234200
Whirpoolx	82136	83360	83464
Nist5	10800	11013	11015

Minercontrol.conf

Code:

"algorithms": 
	[{		"name": "x11",		"hashrate": 3500,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer75.exe",		"aparam3": "-a x11 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "x13",		"hashrate": 2740,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a x13 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "x14",		"hashrate": 2160,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a x14 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "x15",		"hashrate": 2370,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer66.exe",		"aparam3": "-a x15 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "nist5",		"hashrate": 11000,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a nist5 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "lyra2v2",		"display": "Lyra2REv2",		"hashrate": 5200,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a lyra2v2 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "quark",		"hashrate": 7250,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a quark --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "qubit",		"display": "Qubit",		"hashrate": 5520,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer75.exe",		"aparam3": "-a qubit --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "keccak",		"hashrate": 191000,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer74.exe",		"aparam3": "-a keccak --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "lyra2",		"display": "Lyra2",		"hashrate": 1000,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer.exe",		"aparam3": "-a lyra2 --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "whirlpoolx",		"display": "WhirlpoolX",		"hashrate": 83300,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer66.exe",		"aparam3": "-a whirlpoolx --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "neoscrypt",		"hashrate": 210,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer66.exe",		"aparam3": "-a neoscrypt --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "groestl",		"hashrate": 9250,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer75.exe",		"aparam3": "-a groestl --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "sha256",		"hashrate": 240000,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer75.exe",		"aparam3": "-a bitcoin --no-color"	},
	{		"name": "scryptn",		"display": "Scrypt-N",		"hashrate": 253,		"power": 60,		"aparam1": "",		"aparam2": "ccminer.exe",		"aparam3": "-a scryptn --no-color"	}],

dominuspro

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 12:54:46 PM

Release 75:

My gigabyte windforce G1 factory overclocked does 17.9MHASH in the quark algo on standard clocks.
my 2x 6pin EVGA 970 does 15,7MHASH

A quick quark test on my rig:

Code:

[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7121
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 94889 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22162
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 94893 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 94914 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22032
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 94909 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19356
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 94913 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7124
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 94931 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17936
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18124
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10627
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22074
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22279
[2015-12-09 19:45:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19376
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546773
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19162
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10661
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 94977 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 26/26 (100.00%), 94970 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 27/27 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] accepted: 28/28 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18051
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 30/30 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] accepted: 31/31 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22041
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 21844
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19370
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] accepted: 32/32 (100.00%), 94953 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10623
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] accepted: 33/33 (100.00%), 94951 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18056
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17828
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17771
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] accepted: 34/34 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18061
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 35/35 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19347
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 36/36 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 37/37 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546774
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22143
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17911
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10649
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18186
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19250
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] accepted: 38/38 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17834
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] accepted: 39/39 (100.00%), 94954 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17962
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] accepted: 40/40 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546775
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19303
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18069
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] accepted: 41/41 (100.00%), 94957 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22058
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7127
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:46:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7132

Seems some more Hashes for each gpu. But non profitable nowadays Cry

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Release 75:

My gigabyte windforce G1 factory overclocked does 17.9MHASH in the quark algo on standard clocks.
my 2x 6pin EVGA 970 does 15,7MHASH

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

-Now compiled and adjusted for cuda 7.5
-Faster quark on compute 5.2 devices
-Neoscrypt is 50% slower.
-Most algos are slower or same speed.(0-5%)

1.5.75(sp-MOD) is available here: (9-dec-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Please post you hashrates guys.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 11:29:33 AM

Quote from: pallas on December 09, 2015, 07:06:21 AM

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 06:56:19 AM

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-)
I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that.

Neo scrypt is broken in cuda 7.5.
But I will build release 75. Quark is up 150khash on the 960 and 300khash on the 970

There are some dirty tricks to make it work on 6.5 that are probably messing with 7.5: part of the code, when simplified and compacted, works fine on 7.5, but slower.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: pallas on December 09, 2015, 07:06:21 AM

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 06:56:19 AM

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-)
I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that.

Neo scrypt is broken in cuda 7.5.
But I will build release 75. Quark is up 150khash on the 960 and 300khash on the 970

Epsylon3

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1082

ccminer/cpuminer developer

yep, i expect a new cuda version soon, with the Pascal support.. but well... if you have some time to do that

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

You need to wait some more. I will re-tune all the kernals, and hopefully the speed will be restored in all algos.

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 07:32:07 AM

Quote from: pallas on December 09, 2015, 07:06:21 AM

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 06:56:19 AM

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-)
I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that.

I have managed to reach cuda 6.5 speed now with some register tweaking /launch bounds on the 750ti.
But on the gtx 970 x11 is still 5% slower with cuda 7.5

RELEASE dot 75 --

Compiled with CUDA 7.5? Well, hmmm. I am hoping for stability, even if the speed is a tiny bit less. Keeping a watch for the actual release, now... --scryptr

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: pallas on December 09, 2015, 07:06:21 AM

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 06:56:19 AM

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-)
I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that.

I have managed to reach cuda 6.5 speed now with some register tweaking /launch bounds on the 750ti.
But on the gtx 970 x11 is still 5% slower with cuda 7.5

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: sp_ on December 09, 2015, 06:56:19 AM

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5

Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.

It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.

x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-)
I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5

Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.

It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.

x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: impulse2000 on December 06, 2015, 10:41:02 AM

Another overclock my card: MSI afterburner - Core 1461(+220)/Mem 2700(+0)/Temp 62/Fan 52% - Lyra2V2 - 5250kH

Is it stable? Other users report that they can't get their 750ti cards to overclock more than 1360 without crashing. I guess it's because the asic quality of the chip, or the cooler. Factory overclocked card seems to be the best, but they are more expensive.

Cryptozillah

hero member

Activity: 687

Merit: 502

Quote from: bensam1231 on December 06, 2015, 12:26:22 PM

Quote from: pallas on December 06, 2015, 07:21:13 AM

Quote from: Masked_Immortal on December 06, 2015, 01:41:06 AM

Quote from: Cryptozillah on December 04, 2015, 06:30:28 PM

Some numbers from my new 970 rig.
GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC

Rig:
Asrock H81
Celeron G1820
8Gb ram (16gb virtual memory set)
Silverstone Strider 1200w v2
3xMSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC
Powered USB Risers
SSD Hard Drive

Stock clocks: 1102/1753
sp-MOD 1.5.74

why do you use SSD?

Why not?
It's well suited for a mining rig as it draws less power.

They're also about as cheap as a mechanical as long as you don't need a lot of space, which you don't for a mining rig. Makes driver and troubleshooting much faster as well.

Yeah they are pretty cheap these days.
I have 32GB/64GB drives in all rigs.
The disks are reused from older gpu rigs i built a few years ago.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: pallas on December 06, 2015, 07:21:13 AM

Quote from: Masked_Immortal on December 06, 2015, 01:41:06 AM

Quote from: Cryptozillah on December 04, 2015, 06:30:28 PM

Some numbers from my new 970 rig.
GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC

Rig:
Asrock H81
Celeron G1820
8Gb ram (16gb virtual memory set)
Silverstone Strider 1200w v2
3xMSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC
Powered USB Risers
SSD Hard Drive

Stock clocks: 1102/1753
sp-MOD 1.5.74

why do you use SSD?

Why not?
It's well suited for a mining rig as it draws less power.

They're also about as cheap as a mechanical as long as you don't need a lot of space, which you don't for a mining rig. Makes driver and troubleshooting much faster as well.

impulse2000

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Another overclock my card: MSI afterburner - Core 1461(+220)/Mem 2700(+0)/Temp 62/Fan 52% - Lyra2V2 - 5250kH

Al_may

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: duboisi on December 06, 2015, 12:09:24 AM

Quote from: kenshirothefist on December 05, 2015, 12:25:25 PM

What could be the root cause of this error (win 8.1)?

https://imgur.com/OhBqleV

Increase virtual memory.
Control Panel - System - Advance System settings - Advanced - Performance

or you need to reduce your instance variable (the -i 23.85) keep lowering it until u don't get the error.
or increasing your on-board ram to at least 16 GB.
your page file, (virtual memory should never be lower than 1.5 times the on board ram)
and that means that if you go past 1/2 of the size of the hard drive you will start to slow down the hash rate.

Masked_Immortal

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Quote from: pallas on December 06, 2015, 07:21:13 AM

Quote from: Masked_Immortal on December 06, 2015, 01:41:06 AM

Quote from: Cryptozillah on December 04, 2015, 06:30:28 PM

Some numbers from my new 970 rig.
GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC

Rig:
Asrock H81
Celeron G1820
8Gb ram (16gb virtual memory set)
Silverstone Strider 1200w v2
3xMSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Tiger OC
Powered USB Risers
SSD Hard Drive

Stock clocks: 1102/1753
sp-MOD 1.5.74

why do you use SSD?

Why not?
It's well suited for a mining rig as it draws less power.

mmm...
I thought that it maybe improves hashrate
it increases initial cost and i think selecting better cpu has more advantages
by the way Cryptozillah has plenty of SSD and at least he doesn't pay for hard drives.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 846. (Read 2347659 times)