My EVGA superclocked gtx 950 mines quark at 8.3MHASH on factory clocks. Release 62
I have the same card. How far does your boost by default?
Mine goes to 1380. I got shit ASIC, only 66%
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 975. (Read 2347664 times)
I have the same card. How far does your boost by default?
Mine goes to 1380. I got shit ASIC, only 66%
My EVGA superclocked gtx 950 mines quark at 8.3MHASH on factory clocks. Release 62
-Faster x11,x13,x15,nist5,quark on compute 5.2 devices. (quark on the 980ti +500KHASH)
-Faster lyra2v2
1.5.62(sp-MOD) is available here: (29-08-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
-Faster lyra2v2
1.5.62(sp-MOD) is available here: (29-08-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I managed to get the 980ti up to 13MHASH(+250khash) now in x11. Quark is up to 26.6 MHASH(+500KHASH)
blake512 rewrite. Reduced the codesize and registercount. Vector writes to memory...
Submitted on github.
All compute 5.2 devices get a visible boost.
970 +300khash quark..
building release 62...
blake512 rewrite. Reduced the codesize and registercount. Vector writes to memory...
Submitted on github.
All compute 5.2 devices get a visible boost.
970 +300khash quark..
building release 62...
It is not quark it is Your graphic card throttling. Probably TDP throttling, try increasing TDP limit.
Thanks for the reply . Need to edit the BIOS increase TDP. 'll think .Isn't there any headroom with the power target slider on Your(shitty
) picture?It is not quark it is Your graphic card throttling. Probably TDP throttling, try increasing TDP limit.
Thanks for the reply . Need to edit the BIOS increase TDP. 'll think . Why is the quark algorithm varies the voltage and frequency ? release61
Pull shows 6 MH - 9.03 MH ,miner 10.4 MH.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2i4in0jz1hhn97/55e1589b40a65.mp4?dl=0
Pull shows 6 MH - 9.03 MH ,miner 10.4 MH.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2i4in0jz1hhn97/55e1589b40a65.mp4?dl=0
It is not quark it is Your graphic card throttling. Probably TDP throttling, try increasing TDP limit.
Why is the quark algorithm varies the voltage and frequency ? release61
Pull shows 6 MH - 9.03 MH ,miner 10.4 MH.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2i4in0jz1hhn97/55e1589b40a65.mp4?dl=0
Pull shows 6 MH - 9.03 MH ,miner 10.4 MH.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2i4in0jz1hhn97/55e1589b40a65.mp4?dl=0
Use this fork. It has incredible API with a remote control feature and a faster hashrate
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5570-updated-ccminer-1-6-6-git-fork-by-tpruvot-for-windows/
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5570-updated-ccminer-1-6-6-git-fork-by-tpruvot-for-windows/
JSON-RPS CALL FaILED... and debug... dont work. recompile and test. Download and test. QUARK.
Solomining has been fixed.
you can download the latest bin here(or build from github yourself):
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5477-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-61-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
you can download the latest bin here(or build from github yourself):
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5477-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-61-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
Solomine is broken. PLZ look on this...
My new gigabyte windforce 980ti is hasing quark at 26.1 MHASH with the opensource (release 61 +) on factory clocks. x11 is at 12.7MHASH. Seems to draw around 250w. But I need to do a wall reading.
9800 GTX+My 9800 GTX+ did 14kh/s on scrypt with CudaMiner when I tested it. Makes me wonder when we'll have 950ti cards, and whether the next generation of cards will have 16nm chips or use layered technology. What is next?
--scryptr
The AMD 7970 is 3 years old and still hashing pretty good. I think the maxwell series will last for at least 2-3years as well. In the gpu race we have seen the the last years, new hardware is comming out so fast that the coders don't have time to find out how to optimize it...
Anyway I filed a bugreport on the drop in the hashrate on cuda 7.5. x11 is doing 1.9 MHASH in the 750ti. All AES algos are spilling registers to memory like a virgin in a brottel.
My new gigabyte windforce 980ti is hasing quark at 26.1 MHASH with the opensource (release 61 +) on factory clocks. x11 is at 12.7MHASH. Seems to draw around 250w. But I need to do a wall reading.
9800 GTX+
My 9800 GTX+ did 14kh/s on scrypt with CudaMiner when I tested it. Makes me wonder when we'll have 950ti cards, and whether the next generation of cards will have 16nm chips or use layered technology. What is next?
--scryptr
Excellent Maxwell Testrig.
950Ti in your future? I will see what I can donate to that cause.
950Ti in your future? I will see what I can donate to that cause.
Thank you for your support. I hope to work more on the spreadcoinminer. More speed for the donators.
Here is my testrig: Running on an cheap 750w bronze psu. Old gamer pc. Ugly but it works
Excellent Maxwell Testrig.
950Ti in your future? I will see what I can donate to that cause.
950Ti in your future? I will see what I can donate to that cause.
My new gigabyte windforce 980ti is hasing quark at 26.1 MHASH with the opensource (release 61 +) on factory clocks. x11 is at 12.7MHASH. Seems to draw around 250w. But I need to do a wall reading.
Too bad Quark payrates ain't like they were a few months ago, because that is a smoking fast hashrate.But now that X11 is king on nice/westhash, at least with payrates as they are right at this moment, that 12.7Mhash isn't quite as impressive for a 980Ti. But not bad.
Sweet card.
There is more work to do on x11. X11 hasn't been profitable since wolf0 leaked his binaries in november last year.
Here is my testrig with the latest opensource on factory clocks:
The gigabyte windforce oc 970 is doing 16.7 mhash in quark
the 750ti is an old 38w tdp gainward card. And the 960 is a slow gainward with reference cooler
My new gigabyte windforce 980ti is hasing quark at 26.1 MHASH with the opensource (release 61 +) on factory clocks. x11 is at 12.7MHASH. Seems to draw around 250w. But I need to do a wall reading.
Too bad Quark payrates ain't like they were a few months ago, because that is a smoking fast hashrate.
But now that X11 is king on nice/westhash, at least with payrates as they are right at this moment, that 12.7Mhash isn't quite as impressive for a 980Ti. But not bad.
Sweet card.
My new gigabyte windforce 980ti is hasing quark at 26.1 MHASH with the opensource (release 61 +) on factory clocks. x11 is at 12.7MHASH. Seems to draw around 250w. But I need to do a wall reading.
Jump to: