Strange as it may sound, brazil now joins a group of selected dictatorships where X is banned: China, Rússia, Venezuela, north Korea..
That is a twisted fact though. Any country bans any social media platform that doesn't obey their laws. US banned TikTok exactly because of that. There is no difference between that ban and Brazil banning X.
Besides, the reason is very clear. When Brazilian authorities demand X to censor a content, Musk refuses. However when other authorities like US authorities, UK, French, German, etc. authorities demand censorship, Musk obeys. So X is banned in Brazil while it is not banned in US, UK, France, Germany, etc.
Look at how Twitter complied with censorship in all these countries over the years like during the anti-vax protests in Canada, the anti-police brutality in France after the French police murdered a child in broad daylight, and so on.
If Musk were truly pro-free-speech he would have never shut down all those other accounts...
Your opinion somehow swayed mine. I started with a thought that certain local powers simply want international players to bow down to them and their demands. That doesn't seem nice. However, I guess the contrary is more evil, that rich and powerful private companies are forcing governments and their laws to bow down to their own wishes. The world might be far more chaotic that way.
Anyway, it is actually much worse if these elite companies make their own entitled discernment as to which powers to follow and which not to follow, a tendency that many influential global companies have shown. It brings to mind the case of Binance, for example, that is all too willing to comply with regulations of certain powerful countries, bend a knee, and lick their asses while also ignoring the ones set by less powerful states at same time.