Pages:
Author

Topic: Centralised exchange getting better than Decentralised exchange? (Read 549 times)

newbie
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
I hope you all are having a wonderful weekend!

So I recently came across a post where people are engaged in a lengthy debate over whether CEX (Centralized Exchange) or DEX (Decentralized Exchange) is better. So I decided to wrote down this. Frankly, I believe it's a matter we shouldn't dwell on too much because both have their advantages and disadvantages.

For CEX:

Security is reliable if you choose the right exchange.

Transaction fees are reasonable.

It's user-friendly for trading.

You're less susceptible to phishing scams, especially when using a secure wallet.

Various earning opportunities are available.

Let's consider two exchanges I'm familiar with as examples:

For Binance: Despite suffering a massive $570 million hack, Binance remains one of the largest exchanges and not just that, they still keep their standards high.
You can find more details in this link: https://www.investopedia.com/binance-got-hacked-6748215

Now, Bitget: While Bitget hasn't experienced a direct exchange hack, although there was an incident that occurred with their wallet due to a link shared in a group that led to users' accounts being compromised, I won't really call this hack per se but a lesson to everyone. We all need to be careful of links sent suspiciously in any group you're in because you don't know what you will be clicking that will lead to total wipe pf your assets both in crypto and off crypto

 You can also read about it here: https://www.[Suspicious link removed]

I use Bitget more often because I've delved into their security standards and believe they're doing well. However, I still use Binance, as it was the first CEX I encountered on my crypto journey.

Now, let's talk about DEX:

I won't say DEX is bad; it has its merits. Everything is decentralized, as the name suggests. I've used Uniswap and continue to do so. However, it's essential to note that DEX can also undergo KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, as evidenced by this tweet about Uniswap: https://twitter.com/WhaleChart/status/1713291249560535051?t=lyzx4IAlZNiG9Llt4g-Tqg&s=19

Furthermore, DEX can be vulnerable to hacking. Consider Mixin, for example.

What I'm trying to convey is that these debates about CEX vs. DEX should consider that both can coexist and work well if we find the right balance.

Even if I said ok, I want to go offline to be safer. The truth is, Im not sure I can be 100% safe offline either. I was researching offline wallets on Amazon and watching YouTube reviews for recommendations. At some point, I got discouraged because even some offline wallets can be hacked. But that won't stop me from using an offline wallet. Is just picking the best that I know that would be best for me. Just as picking the best exchanges among cex and Dex.

As I've said before, our security largely rests in our own hands. Before an exchange collapses, there are usually rumors. When those rumors start, it's essential to withdraw your funds promptly. Take FTX as an example; Sam Bankman Fried's actions had a significant impact on the exchange. If you've been following his legal case, you'll see that he meticulously planned it out with no remorse, unlike other exchanges that experienced hacks and returned stronger with enhanced security.


Truth is most of these exchanges has had their fair share to either hackers or lost of funds, never knew likes of Hotbit will ever take a bow in the crypto space, they were the first ever exchange I used before finding Bitget and Binance much more easier etc
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
Before a trader could moved their money to exchange I believe they have studied about the exchange security and reliability before leaving a very large funds in that exchange otherwise I can say that there is no experience trader that will possibly want to leave their funds in an exchange they knows nothing about.
Big exchanges like Binance may still be safe, because I also use Binance and store my trading funds there. grow money with the trading and investments that I do. But also often withdraw my funds just in case even though there is a guarantee on SAFU provided by binance. Very large amounts of money left on the exchange will be more at risk because you will not have full access when an attack occurs and it will be lost.
hero member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 653
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I can't find it deem necessary for user to leave their fund in exchange just because they are keeping it for trading sake...

You have written a generalized answer that does not reflect the difference between day trading and long-term trading. If a trader is engaged in day trading and he needs 10 thousand dollars to carry it out, then he cannot constantly withdraw this amount and enter it on the exchange. But if he makes a profit from such trading, he will withdraw the profit from the exchange, since he does not need them for trading.

I am against anyone leaving their funds inside exchange, but for the essence of those who trade daily it would be very hard for them to be regularly withdrawing it out and deposit it again but, if such trade has traded for long time and has accumulated enough profits such person can be able to make it up to withdraw at least some percentage of his profits leaving s/he's capital able him continue trading next morning or till the required time for him to enter market.

I can't find it deem necessary for user to leave their fund in exchange just because they are keeping it for trading sake, to me what is obtainable is to move your profits from the exchange or move out the capital after which the trader succeeded accumulating enough volumes of profit as it may be. Taking out some percentage of funds always keeps you at the safer side because of numerous rumour concerning hack and security breaching that often happened on centralized exchange. To me if not of gas fee for moving in and out of our exchange account the best is to always withdraw them out when we have exited the trade.
it takes discipline to do it. This includes trading discipline, paying attention to where to place money to trade because CEX cannot be trusted even though they say the funds will be safe and will be guaranteed if lost. Making gradual withdrawals from any profits made will save capital funds entering CEX.
But this does require a fee and maybe it can be scheduled every time the percentage of profit will be made with a withdrawal or some other customized scheduler.

Before a trader could moved their money to exchange I believe they have studied about the exchange security and reliability before leaving a very large funds in that exchange otherwise I can say that there is no experience trader that will possibly want to leave their funds in an exchange they knows nothing about.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
I can't find it deem necessary for user to leave their fund in exchange just because they are keeping it for trading sake, to me what is obtainable is to move your profits from the exchange or move out the capital after which the trader succeeded accumulating enough volumes of profit as it may be. Taking out some percentage of funds always keeps you at the safer side because of numerous rumour concerning hack and security breaching that often happened on centralized exchange. To me if not of gas fee for moving in and out of our exchange account the best is to always withdraw them out when we have exited the trade.
it takes discipline to do it. This includes trading discipline, paying attention to where to place money to trade because CEX cannot be trusted even though they say the funds will be safe and will be guaranteed if lost. Making gradual withdrawals from any profits made will save capital funds entering CEX.
But this does require a fee and maybe it can be scheduled every time the percentage of profit will be made with a withdrawal or some other customized scheduler.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1655
To the Moon
I can't find it deem necessary for user to leave their fund in exchange just because they are keeping it for trading sake...

You have written a generalized answer that does not reflect the difference between day trading and long-term trading. If a trader is engaged in day trading and he needs 10 thousand dollars to carry it out, then he cannot constantly withdraw this amount and enter it on the exchange. But if he makes a profit from such trading, he will withdraw the profit from the exchange, since he does not need them for trading.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
It all depends on what you want to achieve. Sure CEX is easy to get started and buy crypto with fiat. But qua security.. forget about it

Keep in mind that each time you provide KYC data to a centralized exchange, that data is shared with  potentially hundreds of other companies, governments.
Each point in the system can have leaks be it employees, hackers or just sleazy security (secops), which can result in phishing attacks, swim swaps and many other problems

Stories on the darknet show how easy it is to obtain certain info about users from CEX..

DEX is mostly for swaps, getting into coins which are not listed and building a wallet which isn't connected to anything.

At CosmoBliss we're actually  analyzing most DEX/CEX  and have a plan to build a DEX without KYC. A proof of concept is already under development. But planned to launch in 2025 (other things need to be built before that to support a true DEX)
it;s a though task but it needs to be done to avoid centralization. Most DEX are centralized because they have just a few servers as point of failures.

hero member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 653
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
...So, people who keep large funds in exchanges or other platforms are doing the wrong thing themselves and they shouldn't blame the exchanges for that. There are exchanges for trading services and there are wallets for keeping your funds safe, so we should know what should be used for what.

There are such options when a trader is forced to keep large amounts in the exchange's wallet, since he uses them for trading. In addition, some of the money can be locked up for staking. With the exception of such cases, it is necessary to keep as much money on the exchange account as is necessary for trading.

I can't find it deem necessary for user to leave their fund in exchange just because they are keeping it for trading sake, to me what is obtainable is to move your profits from the exchange or move out the capital after which the trader succeeded accumulating enough volumes of profit as it may be. Taking out some percentage of funds always keeps you at the safer side because of numerous rumour concerning hack and security breaching that often happened on centralized exchange. To me if not of gas fee for moving in and out of our exchange account the best is to always withdraw them out when we have exited the trade.
sr. member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 272
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Nope, centralized exchanges is becoming more regulated year by year and that is not a good sign for a trader. centralized exchanges has their own advantages too like high trading volume, more trading pairs, support system and etc but the term better is used to denote the security of funds in my opinion where centralized exchanges can't be trusted no matter what.

More regulation will lead to more people being excluded from traditional finance. We already see large swathes of the population being denied from the most popular exchanges due to the country they reside in.

We have seen some cases like FTX where users collectively lost millions or perhaps even billions of dollars. Centralized exchanges aren't necessarily the most secure but at the very least there is some legal recourse if you get scammed or there is a hack. With DEXs it is almost impossible to recover your funds once they are lost although I have seen some exchanges like PancakeBunny try to compensate users in various ways. Neither approach to security makes much difference in my opinion because DEXs will always be preferred by those wishing to circumvent financial censorship that is common in CEXs.

First of all, let me be clear, either its a centralized or decentralized exchange once the funds are hacked its close to impossible to recover anything at all that is why we keep suggesting to every crypto user "not your keys, not your coins".

What happened with FTX is different they filed for bankruptcy and it's the abuse of users' funds and the company lost them which maybe recovered if the reason is not what they said and pooled their money with their companies and diverted in the name of loss but as I said it may never happen at all.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
One major issue with CEX is State's interference with domestic (and maybe later international) legislation of where it is based. For example, this coin is banned, or this individual is banned, etc. DEX seems more immune by design... for example hydranet dex (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62992576) with BTC/LTC lightning and Aeth really allows a high speed CEXlike experience. Then it's all about the users and devs, for example in adding new chains and tokens (not like bisq closeness) or finding a positive reinforcing fee structure, for users, devs and shareholders. Easier said than done.

But being able to "buy and sell" outside of the edicts of the state orders (what you eat beef: criminal offender Cheesy) is quite a worthy path to reach truly uncensorable txs, imho.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 303
The great city of God 🔥
I think there is no need for debate on CEX and DEX. Each exchange interface are different entity. The cex has it's inportant while the DEx also has it's own inportant. What really matters is how save your wallet is. According to people's paspctive on CEX, I think they worry of not being trust worthy of Cex, because all coin held is in total control of exchange which is tantamount to big loss if exchanges shutdown. And morover the private key is in total control of the exchange tactically telling you that you don't have total accept to you potfolio unlike Dex which is more secure with private key and can not be controlled by a third party. Huge amount of coin can be stored in a Dex but can not be stored in CEX due to fear of the unknown.
sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 379
Top Crypto Casino
Nope, centralized exchanges is becoming more regulated year by year and that is not a good sign for a trader. centralized exchanges has their own advantages too like high trading volume, more trading pairs, support system and etc but the term better is used to denote the security of funds in my opinion where centralized exchanges can't be trusted no matter what.

More regulation will lead to more people being excluded from traditional finance. We already see large swathes of the population being denied from the most popular exchanges due to the country they reside in.

We have seen some cases like FTX where users collectively lost millions or perhaps even billions of dollars. Centralized exchanges aren't necessarily the most secure but at the very least there is some legal recourse if you get scammed or there is a hack. With DEXs it is almost impossible to recover your funds once they are lost although I have seen some exchanges like PancakeBunny try to compensate users in various ways. Neither approach to security makes much difference in my opinion because DEXs will always be preferred by those wishing to circumvent financial censorship that is common in CEXs.
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 952
However, it's essential to note that DEX can also undergo KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, as evidenced by this tweet about Uniswap...

If Uniswap does implements kyc, i'm sure people will come up with other interfaces to use uniswap's smart contracts that does not require kyc, this is one of perks of being a dex.

If they try that, they will not only be losing customers, their token will crash heavily because even when a team do have a say in a protocol, the community is the biggest contributors to the exchange. The highest they can do is to flag some IP address that will be coming to the exchange but they will not try to implement kyc.

What does ip flagging help with anyway? There are plenty ways to circumvent that like vpn, proxies. Such restrictions are namesake, especially when most crypto people are tech savvy compared to an average person.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1655
To the Moon
...So, people who keep large funds in exchanges or other platforms are doing the wrong thing themselves and they shouldn't blame the exchanges for that. There are exchanges for trading services and there are wallets for keeping your funds safe, so we should know what should be used for what.

There are such options when a trader is forced to keep large amounts in the exchange's wallet, since he uses them for trading. In addition, some of the money can be locked up for staking. With the exception of such cases, it is necessary to keep as much money on the exchange account as is necessary for trading.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 549
I would prefer to do KYC to ensure that all my coins are safe in a decentralized exchange irrespective of it flaw than hodling my coins in a DEXs exchange whose security of fund is not guaranteed, recall the disappearance of FYX exchange collapsed a year ago with investors funds that is one of the major flaw of CEXs exchange, a lot of investors lost huge amount of crypto, I can't imagine myself hodling some huge fund in such exchange and have a rest of mind, I would rather use them for trading thereafter withdraw every profit earn to DEXs thus saving me from any unforseen future circumstances such as the event that lead to the collapse of FTX exchange.

Decentralized exchange doesn't hold coins, when you interact with dex it's more likely you have the private key to that coin, they don't hold and will never hold a coin for you. The responsibility and what you do it with are in the owners hand. For the decentralized ones that works on protocol, your coins will stay right in your wallet, they only need your permission to connect the wallet with the exchange to interact with it.

Centralized exchanges doesn't give you custody of your coins, they have everything right under their palm and they can do whatever they want to do. But I understand OP reason for giving some credits to centralized exchanges. Centralized exchanges have more listed coins than decentralized ones because it's easy to implement tokens and coins on them than dex. To do that on dex, you will have to bridge multiple blockchains before you can trade which is a tedious work to do. However, the risk in involved in bridging is highly risky as well also.

However, it's essential to note that DEX can also undergo KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, as evidenced by this tweet about Uniswap...

If Uniswap does implements kyc, i'm sure people will come up with other interfaces to use uniswap's smart contracts that does not require kyc, this is one of perks of being a dex.

If they try that, they will not only be losing customers, their token will crash heavily because even when a team do have a say in a protocol, the community is the biggest contributors to the exchange. The highest they can do is to flag some IP address that will be coming to the exchange but they will not try to implement kyc.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 8
BTC Lover|Crypto Educator| We Grow by Learning!
Let's unify the functions first, I use dex to buy new tokens which means smart contracts are not available on cex if they are not centralized, that's what I usually do instead of missing a project.

The security factor between the 2 different wallet options, cex like binance is a shared wallet and has a legal umbrella with regulations available in each country that has recognized crypto, as evidenced by the ftx ceo and terraform funders who are guilty and punished meaning their is an identity that is published as from the exchanger team, while non-custodial like bitget wallet is very vague, creepy and security is in full control by yourself. You can choose to trade publicly or trade anonymously with your favourite coins as usual.

Non-custodial exchanges and wallets have many options, you say that with the facts you have encountered, it is good and security can be maximized, vulnerability can be minimized, anticipation is a must.

Ok, but I have not seen anyone using the bitget wallet complain of it being vague or creepy. Come to think of it, if you think of it like that, then It's like calling all Dex wallets creepy because the wallet also works like a Dex. And it's true, security is in the owner's hands. That's why everyone needs to be careful about how they share their information with a third party
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 257
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
Let's unify the functions first, I use dex to buy new tokens which means smart contracts are not available on cex if they are not centralized, that's what I usually do instead of missing a project.

The security factor between the 2 different wallet options, cex like binance is a shared wallet and has a legal umbrella with regulations available in each country that has recognized crypto, as evidenced by the ftx ceo and teraform funders who are guilty and punished meaning there is an identity that is published as from the exchager team, while non-custodial like bitget wallet is very vague, creepy and security is in full control by yourself. You can choose to trade publicly or trade anonymously with your favorite coins as usual.

Non-custodial exchanges and wallets have many options, you say that with the facts you have encountered it is good and security can be maximized, vulnerability can be minimized, anticipation is a must.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 8
BTC Lover|Crypto Educator| We Grow by Learning!
I don't want to compare which one is better, really for users it depends on their usage skills and choosing the platform that suits their needs. It is more important that you know how to protect yourself against the risks that appear on different platforms, and remember that there is no absolute perfect tool, it depends on your own usage behavior.

The cryptocurrency space is widely popular today, and there are many different attack problems that appear, so don't be too confident that any platform will ensure your assets are always safe, lessons from The past happened a lot from CEX, or DEX, both of which have useful and challenging points for us.

Indeed and to mention with, the exchanges one chooses at this period also matter. At least the ones I have posted have shown a level of security.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 8
BTC Lover|Crypto Educator| We Grow by Learning!
Nope, centralized exchanges is becoming more regulated year by year and that is not a good sign for a trader. centralized exchanges have their advantages too like high trading volume, more trading pairs, support system etc but the term better is used to denote the security of funds in my opinion where centralized exchanges can't be trusted no matter what.

Yeah, there are different factors we need to be looking into before choosing an exchange. We can think about that POR, their transparency and the level in which they operate
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
Obviously the CEXs offer more guarantees and more security, peace of mind but they have only one major flaw they require KYC so they are not anonymous which is why wr must always opt for the DEXs
I would prefer to do KYC to ensure that all my coins are safe in a decentralized exchange irrespective of it flaw than hodling my coins in a DEXs exchange whose security of fund is not guaranteed, recall the disappearance of FYX exchange collapsed a year ago with investors funds that is one of the major flaw of CEXs exchange, a lot of investors lost huge amount of crypto, I can't imagine myself hodling some huge fund in such exchange and have a rest of mind, I would rather use them for trading thereafter withdraw every profit earn to DEXs thus saving me from any unforseen future circumstances such as the event that lead to the collapse of FTX exchange.
There are a lot of things that are off in your post. First of all, a decentralized exchange wouldn't require you to do KYC verification since it's decentralized and there are no central authorities involved. Secondly, an investor or a trader doesn't necessarily have to keep their funds in an exchange and they should know that an exchange is a platform that provides them the opportunity to make trades and use trading-related services and they don't offer a personal and safe wallet for users to be used.

So, people who keep large funds in exchanges or other platforms are doing the wrong thing themselves and they shouldn't blame the exchanges for that. There are exchanges for trading services and there are wallets for keeping your funds safe, so we should know what should be used for what.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1273
However, it's essential to note that DEX can also undergo KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, as evidenced by this tweet about Uniswap...

If Uniswap does implements kyc, i'm sure people will come up with other interfaces to use uniswap's smart contracts that does not require kyc, this is one of perks of being a dex.

It seems the KYC implementation does not inherently implemented on the Uniswap smart contract but rather using a feature called Uniswap Hook, kind of plugin or extension. Also, it can be applied to a specific liquidity providers instead of system wide. We can see those idea does not favour its user since we see many controversies and rejection regarding this initiative.

Though, I can see that the potency of KYC/AML implemented on such platforms is crystal clear and this will make regulator would like to enforce this kind of system.
Pages:
Jump to: