Topic: [CFNP] BC.Game - Crypto Casino | Sig Campaign | Up to $90/W - page 31. (Read 26852 times)

Username: Davidvictorson
Have you placed a sports bet in the last 60 days? yes

Username: BitcoinsGreat
Have you placed a sports bet in the last 60 days? Yes

Is this the right format?

Username: Botnake
Have you placed a sports bet in the last 60 days? yes!

Username: Dickiy
Have you placed a sports bet in the last 60 days? (yes/no) - Yes

We have many open places. 

@Icopress, you didn’t just compensated on posts made before the announcement but as well, created slot(s) where available to future previous campaign participants following the working condition and the circumstances that followed BC.Games having not to get back to you,,, if that ain’t project and personnel management, then I wouldn’t know what that is.

Thanks for not just being an awesome manager but, a good man as well. Hope another project finds you soon. Till we are opportune again, see you on FPL.

Thanks for the updates icopress!

Thanks for all those weeks on your campaign ! Best of luck with the next one 

I am happy to work with you many weeks and I hope we will have other opportunities to work with each other. Bitcoin bless you.
[/quote]

I have seen your works over time and I must confess, every sane person will enjoy working with you as you're one of the best in the forum. I look forward to your next campaign to be the first to apply for it.

You may consider applying to manage this campaign: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/looking-for-a-signature-campaign-manger-for-bitvest-5470477

I am happy to work with you many weeks and I hope we will have other opportunities to work with each other. Bitcoin bless you.

Friends, unfortunately I still haven’t received a response from BC.

Payments for week 16 have been sent (all posts written before I made the announcement are taken into account).


These users transfer to other campaigns that I manage ^{[please check the tables and read the campaign rules]}.


I will also be glad to see the rest in my campaigns when I have a new management opportunity.

I hope you enjoyed working with me as much as I enjoyed working with you. 

I thank you for at least saying this, and before you read the rest of my post I would like to also thank you for creating a well rationalized post.


That's why I don't yell...even though there are obvious cases, BC.game still selectively scams (affiliates were one of the biggest scammed some time ago). However, since they still operate to some level of satisfaction for some players, that's where the line is blurred.

It is my belief that campaign managers should pause campaigns as soon as there is one indisputably valid case...though to this day I'm not sure how much this opinion is shared. It doesn't seem like it's commonly shared.


I agree with that, I do think by the time a project becomes 1xbit level, a little too many will have been hurt. This again, may not be a belief that is shared.


I agree with you here too but still have to reply that when there is an indisputable matter, at least campaigns should be paused to urge companies to address valid complaints/cases as they arise, instead of them piling up like we saw here.


I agree that he is good. I think he could be a bit more vigilant though.


Due course is something that could probably use more definition to help managers and the community in the future.

Does due course mean when a company is obviously a scam, or when the first case or X amount of cases with undoubtedly valid proof as posted? We won't continue that discussion here, someone can pick that one up in the reputation board if they want to discuss it.

No one can expect much from anyone except promoters during suspicion either. Especially from me. I will point out facts, cases, etc, as you (thankfully) have seen around the forum from when I noticed bcgame behavior until my post here (I say thankfully because this should hopefully be enough to mute that alt account). However one, like myself, should not be blamed for not yelling louder during the suspicion period or the period leading up to obviously scam conduct by a company.

I will message campaign managers in the future and see if I get a response.

I'm happy to end the conversation here as I just came here to say one thing that I believe should be said to icopress. If anyone feels the absolute need to discuss and I must reply, I will. I do want to refrain from flooding his thread with further discussion though.

As much as I feel this isn’t the best place or right place to have this discussion, I’ll like to make a few things clear.

I would like to start that, I did see some of your complaints at the time although, didn’t take much to it.

Then again, I’ll like to say;

Until something is proven beyond all reasonable doubt, you shouldn’t expect a compliance at all level. We’ve all be on this forum for sometime and have seen where new projects at times are being exploited and victimized by cheaters. This in fact makes truth what you make it on the forum.
Even existing and trusted projects still gets complaints on their services and still, it’s allowed due course.
Using 1xbit as pointers, once it gets that loud, your sure to see reactions at all levels.

Across projects, complaints and its resolution are subjective as, companies do take their course to tackle issues which could result in delays. Still, I wouldn’t want to bank on that for a justification of denied resolution an a pressing issue but then,
If the case is as loud as we have it on 1k bet on the forum, with more and more veteran users of the forum taking to the case, you would find users distancing themselves from the project.

Icopress remains one of the trusted on the forum and you can as well expect him to make some good judgment and good calls amongst others.
With complaints, testimonials and projects running side by side, it’s easy to assume all is well. It would take more than a handful of complaints to void the counter testimonials on just practices.

I stand to be corrected if I’m wrong but, I like to have a project yo due course and an unequal take by forum users to result any drastic actions. Let’s not be in a haste to make mistakes and in the event that we are, it would be a sad one as well which wouldn’t be any regrettable.

I note the word suspicion on your piece and you can’t expect much when it’s still a suspicion. I do hope we have more on this from other veteran users to speak truth with facts and foster reason with reactions.

I've voiced about the issues of BC.Game when there are topics about it. I gave some neutral feedbacks to those a part of this campaign and was added to people's non trusted judgement list. To this day, I am on icopress's list of people whose judgement he does not trust.

icopress and all campaign participants are capable of seeing the scam accusations section and the ANN thread. In fact, it should be routine to check them. They are also capable of seeing my posts too. I definitely do not keep it to myself as you say. I voice to the extent that my posts can be seen, but without creating a scene.

When all is said and done, after campaign managers neglects the facts posted by other members, and do not post or address issues...sure, I will come here and say "Hey, maybe you should have not ignored the following things", as I did here.

I can't help those who choose to ignore, but I will point it out when they did ignore. There's nothing wrong with that.

TLDR: I've made posts about bc gams and the scam accusation threads were perfectly visible. I also left feedbacks on people who were in the BC.game campaign and got told off for doing so. I definitely did not say absolutely nothing and then come here later. Totally untrue, and an unfair comment to make. If I must link all of the times I mentioned BC Game being a scam from when I found out until now, I will do so.

Also. I would never apply for this campaign, and never have. The moment I saw it was a scam, it was avoided. That's the sane rule with every campaign. I will never apply or be a part of a campaign if I have existing suspicions of scam behavior. Before I have these suspicions, you can't blame me for that. That would be blaming me for not knowing the future.

Also

Use your main account next time.

Great run so far, I must say. I enjoyed working with you
@icopress and am looking forward to, still.

Thanks for the update.

Thanks for the update. My experience in this campaign has been nothing short of amazing and I'm grateful for that experience. Looking forward to working with you again in the future.

I am quite certain I would not only be speaking for myself if I say I am sorry to hear the bad news also. But it is okay, it is not a big problem.

Thank you for the update.

Even now I’m smiling because, it’s been a thrilling management and having to pass this piece of information to let participants have to decide on what way to go shows quality in your management. I can’t say I had issues promoting the brand and I just might hold unto it through the week and maybe till we get the news we hope for and it’s always pleasurable working with you @Icopress, peace Ukrainian!

Thanks for the news icopress. Pleasure to work under your management icopress and I'll keep everything as it is until the end of the week. Hoping to work with you again in the future.

When a campaign is still active and you see signs of scam, instead of taking it to the Ann thread or talking to the CM about what you observed so that they can work with your observations, you'll keep it to yourself and as soon as the campaign closes or stops abruptly, you'll go to the campaign thread like a super hero and drop all your observations, which feels like shitty behaviour to me.

What good is your post if you can't help when the campaign is still running? Or were you hoping for praise from the campaign manager for your response? I’m sure you would have also participated in this campaign despite knowing it has some unattended scam accusations as long as you’re receiving your weekly payment.