No, that would not be ok, but jeremypwr admitted his mistake, apologised
I never acknowledged anything of the sort.
If you read the full post, you had provided a ridiculous and incomparable analogy, and it was that analogy I was referring to with the words "that would not be ok". The rest of my post goes on to explain just how wrong you are.
Just like you did with yahoo62278, you've lied again by taking a single phrase completely out of context to make it look like it supports you, when in fact it is the exact opposite.
You are 100% in the wrong here, and as yahoo62278 pointed out, all you are achieving is putting yourself on more and more campaign managers' blacklists.
That is indeed a very useful feature of this forum that will insurmountably lessen the stress that you will get from these type of people. Encountered someone like this in my previous campaign that I handled and it is indeed a pain in the ass to handle such folks. They will not hear or understand any explanation that you provide and will go on to rant all day and night. Negativity like this one shouldn't be allowed in this forum. 
), please check the 
