Pages:
Author

Topic: [CFNP] WOLF.BET Signature Campaign - Hero/Legendary - Up to 0.01BTC/week! - page 5. (Read 7496 times)

full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 215

And I don't see where it's written that it's just a so-called "extra requirement" and the BM could accept members on his own decision.
I wonder if WOLF.BET is aware of that.
I honestly doubt you had a very proper look at the rules and regulations before writing this


  • I reserve the right to remove anyone, for any reason from the campaign.
  • I reserve the right to change the rules or pay rates for new rounds.

This means that the campaign manager is in total charge and control of the project and has the right to make changes. You can take that anywhere and he will still win the case

hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 586
Bitcointalk username: lixer
Bitcointalk profile URL:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lixer-152822
Current post count (Including this post):  966
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 1
BTC Address: 1H2ENE2MFSCYKcj8vSxqUCM8acHEGhKRmh
copper member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1759
Top Crypto Casino
I'm pretty sure you were wearing the LiveCoin signature when you applied for Wolf.Bet. There's no reason to only change signature/avatar afterwards otherwise.

He wasn't wearing but I'm afraid he didn't inform yahoo when he remove the signature. I was looking at the sheet before this campaign commence and the manager are removing names of accepted applicants when found not wearing, I didn't see his name then.
Then how did he make it to livecoin's spreadsheet?
It means that the livecoin "campaign manager" picked him because he was wearing the signature and this shows that he was willing to advertise for a scam exchange even when there was an unresolved scam accusation which was the purpose of yahoo's blacklist spreadsheet.

Perhaps he was removed from the livecoin campaign when he joined here and changed the signature... It's bad but this should be an eye-opener.
hero member
Activity: 3052
Merit: 685
Quote
The following members have been removed, sana54210, seleme, guoyu78, klaaas, as they are willing to advertise for a scam site.
May i add i am not. when Hhampuz removed his positive i removed and exited the campaign and went for wolf.bet

I'm pretty sure you were wearing the LiveCoin signature when you applied for Wolf.Bet. There's no reason to only change signature/avatar afterwards otherwise.

He wasn't wearing but I'm afraid he didn't inform yahoo when he remove the signature. I was looking at the sheet before this campaign commence and the manager are removing names of accepted applicants when found not wearing, I didn't see his name then.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3282
Quote
The following members have been removed, sana54210, seleme, guoyu78, klaaas, as they are willing to advertise for a scam site.
May i add i am not. when Hhampuz removed his positive i removed and exited the campaign and went for wolf.bet

I'm pretty sure you were wearing the LiveCoin signature when you applied for Wolf.Bet. There's no reason to only change signature/avatar afterwards otherwise.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1007
Bitcointalk username: edmundduke
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/edmundduke-342855
Current post count (Including this post): 1751
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days:
BTC Address: 1JMyACfy1ks8dNaPE8L4ZhD4GwegXK2uZf
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1469
Bitcointalk username: Avirunes
Bitcointalk profile URL:
Current post count (Including this post):  3728
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 94
BTC Address: 1A7oWUMEufLoLoSy8ZpzBsv4hm4xKhP6uy

Will wear once accepted
hero member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 544
Quote
The following members have been removed, sana54210, seleme, guoyu78, klaaas, as they are willing to advertise for a scam site.
May i add i am not. when Hhampuz removed his positive i removed and exited the campaign and went for wolf.bet
hero member
Activity: 510
Merit: 574
Too Little, Too Late.
I like your thread layout and design Cool

Thank you! I like it too.



Just one suggestion though, try to inform the affected users of their removal from this campaigns through direct message to avoid further drama/misunderstanding.

Thank you for the suggestion, I have already done so!
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 4265
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
I like your thread layout and design Cool

A compliment from one of the best in the business, that's a welcome development. He must have learnt from one of the best through observation Wink


Anyone on This list is blacklisted from joining any of my campaigns until decided otherwise!

+1, I applaud this decision of yours. It send a strong message to the entire community that users willing to promoting scam/spam related service due to selfish reasons won't be encouraged by giving them equal privilege as those who still value their ethics and have some atom of humanity left.

Just one suggestion though, try to inform the affected users of their removal from this campaigns through direct message to avoid further drama/misunderstanding.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1813
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
Anyone on This list is blacklisted from joining any of my campaigns until decided otherwise!
There were plenty of chances for many people to have applied for a campaign well before the OP was tagged. I mean just applying to a campaign will not make a person supporter of a scammy business. I guess you might need to revisit your thoughts. Just a opinion form a responsible bitcoiner. Please ignore if you feel otherwise. Thanks.
The warnings were already there. Those people who applied for the scam campaign knew it and decided to choose money over reputation so its if there's anyone they should blame it should be themselves.

Also the manager of the campaign has the right to pick whatever members he feels will advertise for him so I don't see why you don't like his decision. It's not like it's the only campaign here.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 6086
Meh.
I like your thread layout and design Cool
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
Bitcointalk username: Saint-loup
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/saint-loup-975910
Current post count (Including this post): 4755
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 147
BTC Address: 162iFSsumTasR8ZKeQgApBF4UZHFhN7iHC

Reapplying

Bitcointalk username: Saint-loup
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/saint-loup-975910
Current post count (Including this post): 4804
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 151
BTC Address: 162iFSsumTasR8ZKeQgApBF4UZHFhN7iHC


legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
Bitcointalk username: pereira4
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pereira4-381391
Current post count (Including this post):  4146
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 16
BTC Address:  bc1qfy2a2c940x7up6erke76ahzmnn3ql8hz497el5

Reapplying:

Bitcointalk username: pereira4
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pereira4-381391
Current post count (Including this post):  4160
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 24
BTC Address:  bc1qfy2a2c940x7up6erke76ahzmnn3ql8hz497el5
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 516
1BTC Welcome Bonus
Bitcointalk username: diazepam666
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/diazepam666-308392
Current post count (Including this post): 2708
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 7
BTC Address: bc1qgczlakuydfdph7wltdna345zqtghygmmn7exvc

Repplying, Looking for the oppurtunity. Thank you!

Bitcointalk username: diazepam666
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/diazepam666-308392
Current post count (Including this post): 2711
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 9
BTC Address: bc1qgczlakuydfdph7wltdna345zqtghygmmn7exvc
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 605
Bitcointalk username: bitcoin-shark
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoin-shark-843439
Current post count (Including this post): 3400
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 3
BTC Address: 39iN7rGtuUNx1h5p1Wuy9w6WLvACCJS57X

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 595
i will wear the signature after i got accepted

Bitcointalk username: feryjhie
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/feryjhie-329895
Current post count (Including this post): 2465
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 86
BTC Address:3FERY5GPg4e1KwxXPKb2pb46tntR44U3st
member
Activity: 516
Merit: 38
Anyone on This list is blacklisted from joining any of my campaigns until decided otherwise!
There were plenty of chances for many people to have applied for a campaign well before the OP was tagged. I mean just applying to a campaign will not make a person supporter of a scammy business. I guess you might need to revisit your thoughts. Just a opinion form a responsible bitcoiner. Please ignore if you feel otherwise. Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 510
Merit: 574
Too Little, Too Late.
The following members have been removed, sana54210, seleme, guoyu78, klaaas, as they are willing to advertise for a scam site.
Anyone on This list This list is blacklisted from joining any of my campaigns until decided otherwise!



The following positions are open:

1x Legendary
3x Hero Member

Apply now!
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
It surprises me how does (forum rank) not even eligible for this campaign are the ones crying here and there. A project employes the service of a forum user (signature manager) to manage their campaign that simply means, that manager has total control of who gets in or out. And the project most have trusted that individual to deliver a perfect job that's why that particular user was hired in the first place.

That you didn't get accepted doesn't give you a right to question the decision of the manager. Signature spots aren't an entitlement. Some decisions are made above merit especially when the accounts involves are in similar earned merit range. Sometimes, quality of post, quality of english, style of posting etc plays a vital role in getting accepted, Read this; [Guide] Factors to consider before joining paid signature campaigns. Some managers even go as far as putting into consideration your past records on the forum like past signature campaigns and refuse to accept users with history of supporting scam or spam associated campaigns.

Precisely, the profiles I pointed out as an example have pretty poor grammar English wise, which is why I was trying to understand what made him choose those guys above other applicants.
Pages:
Jump to: