The idea of the author of a topic is very good. But I would add to it that those developers who unexpectedly after the end of the bounty program introduce KYC are scammers and they need to be entered into the black list of ICO projects. I'm sure it will be beneficial for both parties, both for private developers and bounty hunters.
in fact many project ico asking kyc at the end of their campaign for the bounty hunter. being right for investors already from the beginning they asked for kyc. It is sometimes very difficult but valuable reward for them would do it. 
Topic: Change Of KYC Pattern - page 3. (Read 18788 times)
The idea of the author of a topic is very good. But I would add to it that those developers who unexpectedly after the end of the bounty program introduce KYC are scammers and they need to be entered into the black list of ICO projects. I'm sure it will be beneficial for both parties, both for private developers and bounty hunters.
The whole idea of kyc among bounty hunters is tolerated at all by most people and the fact is, it becomes even worse when you work for 3 months and over and you are denied your reward just because you failed to provide some documents for kyc verification.
I agree with you on the part that if bounty hunters are required to complete their kyc before joining, it would be ohk.
I agree with you on the part that if bounty hunters are required to complete their kyc before joining, it would be ohk.
Absolutely not, KYC is not done for the crypto world. It was always the most important in this industry to keep everything anonymous and that is for what crypto currencies are standing for. We should lift KYC for bounty hunters.
I totally agree with your opinion and the better way to do KYC through decentralized blockchain service, why every trusted ICO don't use it, or there is no such service now?
I don't think that all KYC is a fraud, this is like opening a bank, parties will definitely ask for your ID for valid identification and can be held responsible when something goes wrong, and KYC can now be used for validation when trading on exchange place or participate in ICO, and can be used to identify participants.
Well , maybe not all KYC is a fraud , but this does not mean that it should not be avoided by all means. It's like with sharks: everyone knows that there are many sharks that are dangerous to humans, but not everyone can distinguish between dangerous and safe, so most people avoid all sharks. I hope my analogy is clear and you understand what I mean .
I have disagree with KYC pattern where its need our ID number and I am afraid will be use fault some thing by untrust team and owner, by the way KYC is april mop or not? or we have submit kyc forever to get active in bitcointalk forum.
This is really a very, very correct decision, which you must unambiguously understand today. Today, it is necessary to change not only the approach to the KYC process, but also the use of KYC as a whole. Because all this is nothing more than deception.
I don't think that all KYC is a fraud, this is like opening a bank, parties will definitely ask for your ID for valid identification and can be held responsible when something goes wrong, and KYC can now be used for validation when trading on exchange place or participate in ICO, and can be used to identify participants.This doesn't all mean fraud and people's intentions to deceive others will emerge if they do. All the data they need is in their hands.
This is really a very, very correct decision, which you must unambiguously understand today. Today, it is necessary to change not only the approach to the KYC process, but also the use of KYC as a whole. Because all this is nothing more than deception.
I don't think that all KYC is a fraud, this is like opening a bank, parties will definitely ask for your ID for valid identification and can be held responsible when something goes wrong, and KYC can now be used for validation when trading on exchange place or participate in ICO, and can be used to identify participants.I would just simply treat all KYC as fraud besides the ones from the known exchanges like binance and the rest but its definitely fraud for a team who's doing ICO to collect data from us knowing that they can send these information to a 3rd party. Say you have invested just about $1K but to them it means you can invest into something which you are not sure yet and it means you have to money. Just this info itself is important not just for a marketing department but for hackers.
I will never agree with the decision to collect the identity from the bounty hunters
This is really a very, very correct decision, which you must unambiguously understand today. Today, it is necessary to change not only the approach to the KYC process, but also the use of KYC as a whole. Because all this is nothing more than deception.
I don't think that all KYC is a fraud, this is like opening a bank, parties will definitely ask for your ID for valid identification and can be held responsible when something goes wrong, and KYC can now be used for validation when trading on exchange place or participate in ICO, and can be used to identify participants.I would just simply treat all KYC as fraud besides the ones from the known exchanges like binance and the rest but its definitely fraud for a team who's doing ICO to collect data from us knowing that they can send these information to a 3rd party. Say you have invested just about $1K but to them it means you can invest into something which you are not sure yet and it means you have to money. Just this info itself is important not just for a marketing department but for hackers.
This is really a very, very correct decision, which you must unambiguously understand today. Today, it is necessary to change not only the approach to the KYC process, but also the use of KYC as a whole. Because all this is nothing more than deception.
I don't think that all KYC is a fraud, this is like opening a bank, parties will definitely ask for your ID for valid identification and can be held responsible when something goes wrong, and KYC can now be used for validation when trading on exchange place or participate in ICO, and can be used to identify participants.
This is really a very, very correct decision, which you must unambiguously understand today. Today, it is necessary to change not only the approach to the KYC process, but also the use of KYC as a whole. Because all this is nothing more than deception.
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
You're absolutely right, but this practice is still going on, they changed the rules at the end of the bounty, this is just to get workers to work for free, so if you are going to participate in a bounty campaign, even if you are not in favor of bounty campaign, get ready to do KYC if you see the coin has potential.
There were so many problems and yet people still go through KYC and complain about it. It is necessary to decide whether you will participate in the bounty companies where you need to pass KYC, or not.
this will not be a problem if indeed the bounty hunters get equal rewards with the KYC they provide. many people complain that KYC requirements are a bit difficult for some people and they don't get the rewards they expect. 
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
It's also good but i think most of bounty do the kyc after the bounty finished and bounty manager usually tell first to the bounty participants that the bounty will need kyc in the end. Tbh KYC is not 100% bad, i mean KYC can eliminate that alt accounts on bounties. So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
Of course they are against it, they maybe want to stay anonymous and hidden from other peoples.
KYC is required to prevent money laundry and scammers, but i think it is ok for hunters who receiving huge reward.
Yes, the rule about KYC should be announced before the start of campaign, not at the end.
for bounty campaign I think it still makes sense with kyc, but there are some for which required kyc for participants and what they get is also not worthy to be called money. except for the airdrop is really nice and has decent pay. KYC is required to prevent money laundry and scammers, but i think it is ok for hunters who receiving huge reward.
Yes, the rule about KYC should be announced before the start of campaign, not at the end.
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty, but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
Some bonus campaign managers have made a request to pass KYC, but many bounty hunters don't care about that. They fill out the participation form and then do their job. After the campaign ended and it was time for bounty hunters to start implementing KYC that they had forgotten when they joined the campaign. So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty, but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
Of course they are against it, they maybe want to stay anonymous and hidden from other peoples.
KYC is required to prevent money laundry and scammers, but i think it is ok for hunters who receiving huge reward.
Yes, the rule about KYC should be announced before the start of campaign, not at the end.
If they announce it that they have been required on such regulation then its considerable and as a hunter its your choice if you
would comply or not to get your tokens but for those project owners who tend to cheat out and not willing to pay up bounty
tokens overall then they would make this KYC as an alibi.
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.
What do you think about this?
Of course they are against it, they maybe want to stay anonymous and hidden from other peoples.
KYC is required to prevent money laundry and scammers, but i think it is ok for hunters who receiving huge reward.
Yes, the rule about KYC should be announced before the start of campaign, not at the end.
Yes this is good thinking about the point. Because at fast need advertise KYC then need opinion then can start KYC Pattern.
Jump to: