Topic: Change rules in bounty programs. - page 3. (Read 3748 times)
I have a negative attitude to the fact that some bounty campaigns change the rules, cut the size of the pool allocated to pay bounty hunter. However, it is very difficult to deal with these phenomena alone, only when a large number of bounty hunters openly Express their discontent, only then the situation changes for the better.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
Unfortunately, room managers can change any condition. Often they prescribe it in the terms of the bounty. Konechno this is not fair in relation to us, to the bounty members. But nothing can be done.
if I do not like the changing rules in the bounty program, so do the crowds. because it can reduce people's confidence in the bounty manager during the campaign. and of course, no participants will be happy when they face changes in the bounty program, There may be a specific explanation of this change.
actually change the rules in bounty program when bounty campaign has been completed should not be done but when the bounty is still running then it can be done by bounty manager but I think it will harm the participants bounty campaign.
Planning and actual operations may be different because of the many influencing factors, such as market, team, and capital. . .
Of course, no participants will be happy when they encounter a change in the rewards program.
Perhaps a specific explanation, or a final compensation, would make it easier for us to accept this change.
Of course, no participants will be happy when they encounter a change in the rewards program.
Perhaps a specific explanation, or a final compensation, would make it easier for us to accept this change.
Some changes in the program and the generosity of the ICO throughout the ICO period are really necessary to improve the work of the ICO and prevent undesirable consequences. So, sometimes it is necessary to limit the number of participants in the ICO generosity campaign, even to reduce the too generous amount of payments if the company does not raise sufficient funds. This is a necessary measure, however, teams can abuse this right and deliberately overestimate the size of their generosity in order to attract more participants, and then after a while, reduce it. Minor, procedural changes are impermissible, which at the same time affect the normal working environment and can generally affect the rhythm and results of the work. Thus, it is inadmissible to change the day for submitting reports, the number of messages, to impose additional restrictions on sections of the forum in which you can not write messages, etc. During the ICO, these petty changes, if not dealt with in time, can lead to big problems.
Sometimes changes have to be made according to the developing process. I'm ok with this until it makes sense. But in most cases it happens like "oh my god, we've got only 20 participants in the signature campaign, we don't want to give away so much tokens..." and I'm definitely against these common cases. It's a mistake that was made by bounty manager.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In most bounties they say something like "we reserve the right to make changes to the terms in any moment" and you can do nothing about that once you've subscribed to a campaign.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
Sometimes, however, an outbreak in telegram chat can lead to the increase of bounty pool or the change of other terms like the day of delivering reports or terms of reviewing the articles.
Nevertheless, bounty hunters should not keep silence when something unfair is happening - we should always try to communicate with the bounty manager and express our discontent.
It's not cool to change the rules on the run without letting anyone out.
I can understand if they have to make some changes based on their marketing strategy but at least they can let everybody know about it by sending auto emails, Telegram messages etc.
I can understand if they have to make some changes based on their marketing strategy but at least they can let everybody know about it by sending auto emails, Telegram messages etc.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
I feel strongly negative about such incidents because they ruin my plans and discredit the initial conditions why I joined this or that project.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
3/4 of the bounties I've participated over the past months prolonged the campaign without adding extra tokens to the pool.
This is definitely unfair to the participants who try to do their best in promoting the project.
In my opinion, when some project is being deployed and all instructions are made in the beginning of the bounty program, you must stick with that, and in that way project is more trustful in the eyes of participants.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
Of course it's bad news with bounty hunter, who just make weekly report without reading news of rule. Sometime in the end of bounty, they don't get any token, because they "violate" rules. The suggestion is, bounty hunter should check rule every week, or follow community. In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
I agree with you completely.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In the process of participating in the bounty, I came across this.
You know, it would be good if, under any changes to the rules, participants were informed by mail. Unfortunately, I did not observe this.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
It's not something new in bounty dude! There are many bounty projects that change the end date of the campaign and the allocation of tokens to bounty participants,
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
they already warn you that "the bounty manager and the team have the right to make changes at any time" on their bounty thread, right ?
feel a little pissed off, but i dont really care. that is the consequence that i have to take when i joined their bounty programs.
I think if changing the rules in the bounty program would be better for the righteous and righteous. Reduce fraudsters and poor quality to campaigns. Make it difficult for that campaign.
In my mind, It’s not problem if they change the rules to make campaign better or prevent the out of control about participant increase, scams, spams to much…
Example,
In case there are many participants while bonus pool is limited so the project manager can stop register new participants or except high level bitcointalk accounts..
In case there are many scams, the manager can change the rule to identify if new participant register to join maybe more information than before…
In case many spams, the project manager can request high quality posts/articles from participants or disallow post many times in a short interval ….
In general, I am not agree with the dishonest change but I am very happy when they change for better campaign.
Example,
In case there are many participants while bonus pool is limited so the project manager can stop register new participants or except high level bitcointalk accounts..
In case there are many scams, the manager can change the rule to identify if new participant register to join maybe more information than before…
In case many spams, the project manager can request high quality posts/articles from participants or disallow post many times in a short interval ….
In general, I am not agree with the dishonest change but I am very happy when they change for better campaign.
Perhaps many peoples are very enthusiastic about bounty. Moreover, the bounty lasted quite a while and did not limit the participants to join, the tokens had been allocated in the amount specified for each campaign but with many the number of participants become tokens that have been prepared is not sufficient to pay the participants, so manager of bounty change payment also change the rules bounty .
Indeed this is not fair, but even if report to moderator is there action by moderatore?
Are there any sanctions for the bounty project that changes the rule and the amount of coin at the end of their project?
Which is actually not fair for participants who are loyal to be in the bounty project to struggle to do the terms of the task given from the beginning of bounty open until bounty is end
Indeed this is not fair, but even if report to moderator is there action by moderatore?
Are there any sanctions for the bounty project that changes the rule and the amount of coin at the end of their project?
Which is actually not fair for participants who are loyal to be in the bounty project to struggle to do the terms of the task given from the beginning of bounty open until bounty is end
I really hate any change of rules during the bounty. It seems to me that this is unfair. After all, when you choose a project, you agree to the conditions that you are exposed. And perhaps, the new conditions would not suit you. But you have already spent a lot of time and you feel sorry to throw the project out.
Changing the rules in bonus programs is very common, because in some project of the development team it is necessary to adjust some things so that they correspond to reality.
Jump to: