I believe that moving this thread wasn't an act of censorship, but rather an invitation to experiment with various improvements and let them mature in the alt space.
The experiments have been ongoing and don't need any invitations from the bitcoin community. This thread has nothing to do with PoS explicitly and wasn't even advocating moving away from 100% PoW and I have already stated that it is possible the 100% PoW is the best option forever and Satoshi got it perfect the first time around. The details of experimenting with different algos has absolutely nothing to do with this topic.
This thread had 3 central purposes:
1) Discuss the Prohibited or disputed aspects which define
Bitcoin 2) Take a poll on one of the disputed aspects of
Bitcoin and see how many people would be open to the idea of a possible future hardfork within Bitcoin.
3) Collect a sampling of data to see how flexible
Bitcoin may be in evolving in the future.
I understand some people don't agree with
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes and believe that moving away from 100% PoW should be in the category of Prohibited changes and that is fine because this thread was intended to make their voice heard as well.
The fact that this thread is now in the alt section I can see the stats on the poll are already starting to become an inaccurate representation of the bitcoin community because we have gone from 62% to 65.2% open to the idea of changing bitcoin since this thread was moved. I wanted to take a sampling of data which was more likely to represent a Bitcoin users thoughts and not an altcoin users thoughts.
So instead of a moderator simply expressing his opinion and voting as you have done, he hides this thread in the alt section and thus skews the data from the poll.