Topic: Chasing the big multipliers in soccer (Read 361 times)

in the case of parlay bets I don't really like that, because there is a very large risk of defeat that must be obtained when one of the teams chosen does not match our predictions.
indeed when choosing a multi or parlay bet it looks very profitable and the multiple wins are very large, but I tried several times before and it never worked, I thought maybe my luck was very small in this sports betting.
but sometimes a gambler who doesn't want to try betting on multi or parlay anymore, they will be tempted and try again in the hope that luck is on their side.
and I prefer single bets rather than having to choose parlay bets.

I can never bet like this, no fun going for betting if I just prefer to go for the underdogs, the better team is likely to win. If the strong team do not win, the match can still be drawn, which makes going for underdog to be a loss. I can go for underdog, but in special cases and for some reasons that the underdog might win, I have done that before that I have won, or going for underdog win or draw. But the fun I have while betting is to choose the right team to win.

I don't know what is the current result of the match you made your bet. I'm fond of doing this kind of under dog bets on my early days of betting. I remember that I like betting on TI matches on dota2 and I always bet on either underdog and my favorite team to maximize my overall profit. To those who experienced dota2 items betting before, I made my 10+ keys into a DC hook. That is how effective I do this technique before but yeah it's not effective at all since that current TI is the only TI I made profit from doing this kind of betting strategy.

I feel that is best to gamble on least amount of games in football betting if you are seeking big multipliers. I remember times when companies allowed people to bet on single derby (like promotion) so everyone tried many different multiplied combinations. Some people won extra-ordinary amount of money. As soon as you increase number of games to more than 2-3, like 5 with uber awesome odds, your winning chance drops a lot.

This is really relatable. I sometimes think that my betting patterns have become so dull and very predictable that luck itself is avoiding me. Every once in a while, I will go ham on one single bet, or create a 10-leg parlay just to see if it will hit, and to also "cleanse" my bad luck. I know that it doesn't work, and it's obvious that it's just to remove the redundancy of the "pattern" that I am doing, but it clears my frustrations somewhat—and if it wins, then it's a bonus that I'll gladly take.


This is the basics of how odds are generated by the oddsmaker. The one they think that is more probable to win will receive low profits, whereas the underdogs will always get juicy odds with high returns. You take your pick, and as bets come in, the odds will shift depending on who's getting the more bets.


How would a team getting the most bets win an event? Those events are not connected to the gambling platforms, and the bets coming in does not influence the games at all

But I think when in sports betting there is a team that has a percentage of multiples of profits with a large number, the team will experience defeat. There is very little chance of winning the match.
And vice versa, if there is a team that has a percentage of multiples of profits with a small or small amount, then it is clear that the team will experience victory.
If there is a team that has a small percentage, this happens because many gamblers have placed bets on that team and I think in a sports match if there is betting in it, the victory belongs to the team that gets the most bets.

Going against the odds would put you at risk but would definitely generate bigger profit. But to emphasize bigger risk, that is on you as a gambler whether to go against it or not. The only advantage of following the odds is to have a bigger confident with the winning bet inspite of having no certainty still. If you are a risky gambler you'd more likely go against because it would seem to be a shortcut to bigger profit but on my end, I think it is not. Following the odds is advantageous especially if you are not familiar with the teams in a match but you are eager to bet.

But going with multipliers, it is a risky move. You could lose all of your bets or win all of them . As I've mentioned, bigger profit means bigger risk. You choose as a player. On my end, Id prefer to play my bets safely not only in football but to all sports.

Going against the odds is really interesting and in some matches it used to turn and finally our bet used to fail. I've got chances to win big odds from tennis matches. Most of the time I used to do live betting. Here it is an easy task to go with the best odds. As said it is a way to examine whether we're lucky or not.

Mostly bet like this do make a better winning because a I have known about sport bets is luck and more luck. You can blindly select some match for winning and people asking you that the bet is a dumb one for you can be fortunate enough to end up having a fantastic winning. That is how all this kind of bets do work. It is not always based on experience or skill most time but luck can comes in.

There is also a chance that you could end up with like 3.20 odds for a team and get like 5 of them on the same parlay and you will end up with gambling a good amount and winning it. I am not saying 5 underdogs will win at the same time, but it is also not impossible and some people do it.

Or you could pick the favourites but they are favourites for a small margin, like you know those games when one team gets 2.00 and the other gets 2.80, it is not a by far thing but close enough and you pick the 2.00 one and then play 10 of them or something. These are all very very low chance but that is why they pay a huge amount and they are not commonly won, but when you win it's all worth it.

Did you lose all of them? I can confirm too, haven't checked the Porto match result. I don't track that league a lot. Anyway, I had this experiment long ago lol, and at the end, I was in loss overall. In soccer, such result happen a lot of times, yesterday for example. PSG lost the match. If you continuously bet on underdog, you are going to lose a lot for sure.
I have gotten 5+ odd a few times but that's rare of course. I was lucky in the last cricket T20 world cup, I was able to get 7+ odds in 2 match if I can remember correctly.

Like i stated earlier, i love multipliers, infact, I cant really do sports betting without trying out multipliers, i always to see those crazy amount of money i stand a chance of winning with a bet of $1 if all the games in the bet slip push through, though i dont always expect to win though, i just have fun looking at the numbers, and the goodnews is that even as difficult as it is to win bets with multiple games in one ticket, ive luckily won it two or three times on stake.com, the unfortunate thing was that i didn't stake a good amount of money in the two times i won.

I'm not too fan of multipliers. Even though there is the promises of high profits, we need to take into account that the risk also goes up exponentially. That is why I prefer to avoid multipliers and only go for them with sure bets.

I will take your advice and bet on underdogs who really have a chance to win... I learned that big multis in sports bets are too hard to hit and we must have a lot of luck to hit more than one or even one.

My next underdog bet will be in MMA.. in 2 days the legend Fedor Emelianenko will fight against Rayan Bader, and Fedor is the underdog with a nice x3.75 on it. I think this fight has a good chance to win. So let's see.

Sometimes I do "dumb" bets like this just to breakaway from my betting patterns. I tend to get bored doing the same stuffs over and over so it's quite fun to do something else. Win rate is low as well but it doesn't hurt since the amounts are within my limits. Of course I personally do not recommend anyone to follow this kind of style.

I want to correct what you said, maybe in casino gambling. we better not take it seriously. which means, we just play for fun.

IMO, sports betting can be taken seriously especially football. but with conditions, must have sufficient knowledge and experience of the teams that will compete. in this case, I'm referring to the big leagues. as you said, choosing a single bet is the most ideal thing than gathering several teams and then entering a parlay bet slip. single bets are more promising for victory, because we only bet on one match and this is obviously very different from the parlay option.

IMO, the problem is that most gamblers want the highest profit offered by the dealer. as in this case, the Op. the most fun thing about choosing an underdog team is because the odds that the dealer gives are very high. however, in fact if we refer to statistics, teams, odds, then it's only natural that the bookie gives big odds.

because most likely, the underdog team will lose and this is the simple logic. however, it could happen otherwise the team that is not the seed will win. However, it is important to remember that we must involve analysis, knowledge and all the latest information regarding the match. in essence we as gamblers must use logic when we want to bet, principles of knowledge and analysis are needed to be considered especially in parlay options. ideally, if you want to bet on a parlay, 3 teams are enough for me. the chances that we have too, are bigger than choosing many matches.

It is good to go for single games instead of accumulating bet, that is one if the right thing to do while gambling because one game can cause an accumulated bet to be lost. But the mistake I see is that you are going for underdog, because they are having more odds and you think they can win, or draw. So far matches can be won, drawn or lost, that creates more ways to lose. You selected some to draw where it is possible that the underdog might lose or win. I will advice you to just go for clubs you think that would win if a strong club is playing with an underdog. Never take gambling that serious.

That's a good choice go with singles than a multi. Unfortunately none of the bet have won. These kind of betting used to be very interesting, because we are playing against the odds predicted to win. I've placed similar bets on Tennis matches and I never go with 6 bets at a row. Maximum I bet on two matches. This is just an experience to correct yourself and make better strategies for the next matches.

Bad luck this time, but keep trying and adjusting the strategy, at some point you will match the correct result. Next time i just think you should select more carefully which matches you are going to pick. The Porto and PSG ones were unnecessary. That is the kind of risk that doesn't worth to be taken, or maybe you could have placed a lower bet on those matches, so you didn't sacrifice your money too quickly persuing underdogs.

There are a lot of people who are abusing the selection of sportsbooks as well, that is why oddmakers had to work hard. They would gamble on all possibilities at different places to drop the possibility of a small loss, that way they would just bet different bets on different sportsbooks and whatever the outcome was they would win.

They would hunt down on those differences in results and get a profit that way. So it is not just about adjusting the odds, it's about making sure that the book doesn't bankrupt because of those people. In the end we do not have it that wide anymore, most sportbooks have pretty close odds in all around the world.