Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
I think they are just using the bounty hunters to promote their campaign with the reward of reward, but after their project success with the hard cap, they do not pay the bounty hunter job. it never happened to me on the burst qi project. neither the bounty hunters get paid from their projects. 
Topic: Cheating in bounty programs - page 15. (Read 2272 times)
In general, if the ICO project is crowdfunded, most of the time they will pay the bounty on time.
But if the ICO project isn't crowdfunding successful, it's a pity that most of the time they'll find a lot of excuses to refuse to pay the bounty.
But if the ICO project isn't crowdfunding successful, it's a pity that most of the time they'll find a lot of excuses to refuse to pay the bounty.
In some campaigns, ICO really deceives the participants in the signature campaign. Parts change the rules of the campaign, if they see that participants can earn a lot of profit, this amount changes to a much smaller amount. However, the most common and often occurring deception is that, after the completion of the ICO, campaign participants begin to require signatures to perform various actions, which are called the requirement to pay tokens. In this case, you need to go to different sites, register there and perform various actions, which are sometimes simply incomprehensible or something you can not find. It's just a nightmare. Especially if the bad Internet and constantly throws from the page, or it just hangs. As a result, all the required can not be performed and the tokens are not paid.
Absolutely yes...some bounty managers/concerned personnel cheat bounty participants. Some of them find it difficult to pay the assigned percentage after the end of campaign.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
Consonant! there are such unfair campaigns. I participated in the bounty of arcblock. Everything was cool, all the participants worked. But in the end it turned out that the pool for bounty is not 1 percent. The reward for all was 1 percent of 8 percent.Instead of $ 500, I made $ 70.
probably the cheaters do exist but are proven to be honest until the expiration of the bounty is also very much. cheating is so unsettling even though I have never experienced and should not going on that kind of thing.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
I have read in several threads about managers who do not pay bounty hunters. this is the risk of all of us.
until now I have not felt harmed by a bounty campaign. all this time all smooth, because I always try to do the job properly.
You can run into problems with bounty campaigns and to be honest you need to accept that as part and parcel of the process. You should therefore select your campaigns more carefully to start with and check if they are being managed by someone with a good reputation already and not a Newbie.
There are cheats on both sides I have seen one instance where sombody used 25 accounts on a signature campaign to get a bigger share of the pot at the end.
There are cheats on both sides I have seen one instance where sombody used 25 accounts on a signature campaign to get a bigger share of the pot at the end.
All who expressed their opinion in this topic are right and talk about those problems of bounty hunters that many face when participating in companies.
There are Bounty campanies with disgusting management - rules changing every week, reports are not counted according to the established payment but as the bounty manager wants, the company finishes the bounty, but continues the ICO and reduces payments to the bounties, or does it at all withdraw itself and changes the site, or they dont update spreadsheets in time, and all bounty hunter should add them in Blackpapper and ignore such campanies.
There are Bounty campanies with disgusting management - rules changing every week, reports are not counted according to the established payment but as the bounty manager wants, the company finishes the bounty, but continues the ICO and reduces payments to the bounties, or does it at all withdraw itself and changes the site, or they dont update spreadsheets in time, and all bounty hunter should add them in Blackpapper and ignore such campanies.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
I think were cheated on some bounty campaigns. Some are dropping the amount they are going to distribute, some wanting KYC while they have never been planned. In this way they are reducing the amount they will dispense.
Some bounty campaigns didn't pay according to what they planned. The allocation percentage is not meet when giving the reward. They drop the amount of reward into a half of the original percentage. They are delay to distribute and pay incomplete token even the project become successful and growing in the market.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
so far do not get into trouble with the division of bounty that I should get. most gift hunters are too compelled to claim to charge a full fee, but their work is so out of date and likely spam. sorry i'm not criticizing everyone, but some people make me sick. today many members only make social media reports and they use signatures but without creating educational or sharing posts. I want more strict manager to pay attention to bounty sign participants
I haven't experienced bounty cheaters so far but I oftentimes hear stories of scammers in bounty programs. What happens usually is that after a certain period of time, they will be asked to put a money down for them to continue then after giving out a certain amount, they won't hear anything and was not able to recieve anything also. Tht's what I heard so far...
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
Now, over time, more and more diverse methods are becoming available to ensure that signatory campaign participants do not pay already earned tokens. Yes, it was after the completion of ICO that some ICO companies began to require identification data and copies of passports. I believe that they should do this before joining the signature campaign, so that anyone has the right to choose to provide such data or not.In addition, some companies require you to register on other sites, and then begin to require various actions and information messages, moving from one page to another, you need to enter something, but it does not always work. It happens that from this page throws out and all this is done in the end can not. And in the end, you do not get tokens. I consider this to be a new kind of fraud, because there are conditions for joining, and after performing the specified work, tokens must be paid without any conditions and the need for payment claims.
Yes, there are projects that don't want to pay compensation to bounty hunters. But fortunately, there aren't many such projects. Others pay, though not always completely.
Yes some bounty cheat at the end of the campaign they do that for their own purpose like changing their rules so that the bounty hunters that give time and effort for them will not get their earnings for the hard work. And the bounty hunters will get nothing and those people that organize the bounty will get the shares or earning of others. We only way that we can do is to put those bounty manager a negative trust so that when they organize another bounty campaigns the bounty hunters will be aware to join them.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
I've been their. And what I observed on some successful ICO's are they don't pay bounty hunters right, some are reasoning that you need to go KYC to GET THE BOUNTY REWARDS, I mean there is no stated conditions like that before you start, OR they would reduce the amount you can get by changing the allocated amount because of the reason that they have problems on eth congestion, on their distribution, on cheaters, too many to mention. I suggest that you stick with the good campaign managers because even if the allocated reward is not big compared to others, the thing for sure is you would sure get your reward and that is we work for.
Do you think that some bounty programs cheat because they do not want to pay bounty hunters by bringing out things to do at they end of bounty campaign? Share your thought or experience.
I have experienced it many times,most of these new bounty campaigns will change the rules like at the end of the campaign they will require you to submit your IDs for the KYC verification.How the FCK those people who doesnt have passports yet ? not going to receive stakes because of that,hard earned stakes will be ignored,a shady corrupt bounty managers will always find their ways to steal those allocations for the bounty hunters.Some campaign do that, dont know why though. For example you need to do some kyc, im fine with kyc if they accept national IDs as well but they only accept passport geez that hard. If they want to do some KYC like that is fine as long they announce it before campaign even start. Not like everyone got passport
If they need KYC then they need to disclose that up front, before the bounty starts. Throwing that in at the last minute is a douche move. Also, why would they need KYC if they are giving the tokens out?
I encountered one recently, Coinvest. They are not giving stakes if you don't invest in their crowdsale and it wasn't said in the bounty paper. Some guy learned it after talking to admin and he left the bounty group after pointing that...
Moreover, they'll be distributing bounty rewards throughout the year, a part of the bounties each quarter... I mean what the actual f*ck?
Thanks for pointing this out. I wouldn't even buy into such a project from the look of things as it is fraught in deceit.Moreover, they'll be distributing bounty rewards throughout the year, a part of the bounties each quarter... I mean what the actual f*ck?
... they should be punished and burned alive because cheating a lot of people is unforgivable ,what a shame to the community and to the eyes of our lord.
I hope this isn't another barbarian from the third world country? How on earth do you think such a punishment is appropriate for theft? SMH...And you dare insert "Our Lord" into it? Now give yourself an ironic clap offering for that gory suggestion. 
In my opinion, unless the project is failed, the teams wont cheat the participants. this is a game and both sides need to do right things. if not, the investors wont invest in their coins.
Jump to: